You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
What if you were in charge of GM?

874 messages, Last post on Oct 28, 2009 at 10:20 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
| Couldnt have said it better myself. | |
|
If I were in charge of GM. If....not gonna happen but if. Company jets.......sell em......we make cars dont we? Fire everyone in the styling department. Do what GM does best....V8 Take the same engineers who made the latest V8 and have em make 2, 3, and 4 cyl engines. And give ME a truckload of cash................and I'm gone! |
|
|
If I were in charge of GM, this is what I would have done. 1) Keep Chevrolet and Cadillac and dump the other brands. GM's market share only justifies having two active brands. 2) Eliminate all bonuses and stock options for executives. They make enough with just their salaries. 3) No more unions. The UAW can fight it by striking which would bankrupt the company and everyone would be out of work or they can accede and save jobs. Modern labor laws can protect these workers, but do away with ridiculous perks like job banks. |
|
|
Replying to: dtownfb (Jan 06, 2009 9:37 am) Then, a series of bad missteps (not redesigning the S-Series after 5 years, the Vue and L-Series being too late, etc.) and then when Saturn got folded into traditional GM and the polymer panels went away, I knew that was the end of the road for Saturn. Saturn really should have been a car company that stayed to its roots- affordable, reliable, plastic-bodied cars (and the Vue) that were somewhat quirky and brought non-GM buyers into the GM family. Once those buyers got in, Saturn could upsell them into a Chevy, Buick, Pontiac, etc. after a great ownership experience with a Saturn. The Relay and Outlook are/were mistakes. Not having a well-defined mission for Saturn is really what killed it in the end. That, and becoming folded into the rest of GM. Having the separate plant, labor contract, dealer network, product, etc., really helped Saturn get the number of buyers it picked up in the 1990s.
|
|
|
Replying to: jchan2 (Jan 27, 2009 8:27 pm) |
|
|
|
|
1. Drop Pontiac and Saturn branded passenger cars & SUV's, GMC pickup trucks and SUV's. Restrict GMC branded products to heavy duty commercial vehicles only. GMC has severe overlap with Chevrolet..too much duplication...badge engineering does not play in the market anymore. Badging the Aveo as a Pontiac model will not prove profitable. Since Opel is the primary source for many Saturn products, drop the Saturn name and re-introduce the products as Opel if line is not discontinued. 2. Reduce passenger car convenience and power options. Only offer the most popular ones. Too many options increase consumer purchasing and operational confusion and adds to manufacturing, mechanical and servicing complexity unnecessarily. Many are never understood or used by end users. 3. Reduce or eliminate excessive or bizarre exterior colors and interior fabric choices. Three grades of fabric should suffice. Restrict fabric patterns to three per fabric grade. Bizarre exterior colors and equally bizarre fabrics damage resale values. 4. Eliminate any trim line that fails to sell without reservation.
|
|
|
Replying to: netranger4 (Jan 28, 2009 6:41 pm) They do need to cut brands. If that needs a government assisted bankruptcy then do it. Right now they are nibbling around the edges. They need to make some deep cuts. |
|
...I would pull the plug on OnStar. you know how expensive that operation must be to run?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: bpizzuti (Jan 29, 2009 7:55 am) I wonder if it's actually a contractor setup where GM has nothing to lose and makes a percentage. Sort of like the departments in a store like Lowes or HD where what appears to be part of the store is actually a contractor/vendor taking the risk with merchandise and all. Frankly if OnStar were priced more like a Walmart product, I suspect the penetration of the potential market would be much, much greater and overall profits higher despite having a lower price to the individual user. You've brought up a good subject and I hope someone has some data.
|
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Jan 29, 2009 12:39 pm) Can Paying for a Telematics Service Actually Save You Money? Not sure what data you can gleam from the lead story since it focuses on potential driver savings, but here's the link: What's the Best Value: Paying for a Telematics System or Buying Separate Services |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
What if you were in charge of GM?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats