Sign In Join 



What if you were in charge of GM?

874 messages,  Last post on Oct 28, 2009 at 10:20 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Classic Cars, Concept Cars, Future Vehicle


Messages Page 17 of 88
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
...
88
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#156 of 874
Re: Rebuilding GM [magnette] (cooterbfd) by hpmctorque
Jan 04, 2009 (1:53 pm)
Reply
I've seen only one Astra on the street since its introduction.
#157 of 874
Re: Rebuilding GM [magnette] by TIMGT5
Jan 04, 2009 (3:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: magnette (Jan 04, 2009 11:23 am)

I agree with you that too many of Americans are driving truck based SUVs. More people should look at compact cars. My point is that GM already has the upcoming cruze and under my plan a rear wheel drive 4 cyl compact for Pontiac would cover the "driver's" niche car angle, another small car would just muddy the mix. One of my problems with GM has always been too many cars going after the same market.
 
As for why Americans prefer bigger cars, well there is some pyschology you have have to understand. Conduct the following experiment. Walk up someone you do not know from your side of the pond and observe how close he or she lets you come before moving away from you. Then do the same to an American stranger. You find on average the American will more likely move away from you sooner. The reason for this is that Americans have a very strong sense of personal space and space ownership. This is why a higher percentage of Americans live in detached houses, own their own cars and have more suburban development.
 
There will always be a number of Americans who will not be comfortable in a car that forces you into close proximity with the other occupants. The trick is going to be to make bigger cars more fuel efficient. The forth coming Ford Fusion hybrid, again a "large" car by your standards is supposed to get 40mpg.
 
I understand where you are coming from, but I am not sure the Astra is GM's miracle compact. The Honda Civic gets better MPG and has more power and a bigger interior. If GM fields a car it must be the undisputed winner in almost every comparisson test, R&T, CR, Car and Driver etc. to win buyers back.
#158 of 874
Re: Rebuilding GM [magnette] (cooterbfd) [hpmctorque] by magnette
Jan 04, 2009 (3:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Jan 04, 2009 1:53 pm)

Well, that's not good for Astra - but you would have to ask why GM can't sell the thing over there, when here it's the standard patrol car for the Metropolitan Police in London, for a start (badged as a Vauxhall, rather than an Opel, but it's all from the same production line... It's the second best selling GM product in Europe, after only the COrsa - which I would imagine is too small for your market...
If they can't sell the Astra competitively in the US against VW's Golf, with your huge network of dealers, but they can in Europe, maybe the question is whether GM's management could find its a** with a map - or perhaps they were too busy polishing the corporate jet...
#159 of 874
by hpmctorque
Jan 04, 2009 (5:11 pm)
Reply
"...Astra - but you would have to ask why GM can't sell the thing over there..."
 
In a word, it's price. It's too expensive compared with the competition. The pricing suggests that GM is more concerned with margins than volume with the Astra, in large part because the value of the euro vs. the dollar doesn't permit GM to make a profit on this car at lower prices.
 
Price isn't the only reason the Astra isn't selling well in the U.S., but I believe it's the primary reason. Another important reason is a very small marketing budget.
 
Reason #3 may be that the future of the Saturn Division is up in the air.
 
I don't doubt that the Astra is a good car, but is it better than, say, a VW Golf/Rabbit or Honda Civic, just to mention two competing models?
#160 of 874
Re: [hpmctorque] by dtownfb
Jan 04, 2009 (8:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Jan 04, 2009 5:11 pm)

You hit the major reasons for the Astra slow sales. There are probably 6 or 7 cars in this segment that beat the Astra on price, performance, and/or fuel mileage. Quite honestly after GM offered the Ion, no one is rushing to Saturn to buy small cars. I think Ion was declared the worst car in America by one car magazine. The second car introduced under the Saturn name was the L-series which was a re-badged Malibu, complete with all the problems that plagued that generation Malibu. Then you had the Vue which had to borrow a V6 from Honda. Not exactly the way you want a new product line to roll out.
 
I like what GM planned to do with Saturn (Opel designs) but GM starved Saturn for so long that they destroyed the brand. To save all the research dollars, GM should move the products scheduled for Saturn to Pontiac. But I just read the current Motor Trend and it appears that Buick may be the recipient of the Opel 's designs which leaves Saturns future in question. Well, not really. I think we all know how this story ends, it's a matter of when and how.
 
I have a feeling that by the end of this month, we should know more about GM's fate. The fat lady is already warming up on Chrysler.
#161 of 874
Re: [dtownfb] by TIMGT5
Jan 05, 2009 (1:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: dtownfb (Jan 04, 2009 8:06 pm)

It seems GM kept using Saturn as the "Beta" models to work out the flaws and kinks in the platform before putting them up for sale as Chevys. The Aura is the Beta for the current Malibu and the Ion was the Beta for the Colbalt. In each case the Chevy product comes out better in reviews.
 
I still think that if GM wants Pontiac to survive and improve it is going to have to go its own way in design and engineering. In the plan I laid out in an ealier post, Pontiac would be an all rear wheel drive, performance oriented niche seller much like Toyota's Scion.
 
Again Saturn no longer has a clear mission and is now a waste of research and marketing dollars.
#162 of 874
Re: [dtownfb] by imidazol97
Jan 05, 2009 (6:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: dtownfb (Jan 04, 2009 8:06 pm)

>The second car introduced under the Saturn name was the L-series which was a re-badged Malibu, complete with all the problems that plagued that generation Malibu
 
Which car is that? I'm confused on Saturn's offerings. The L-series cars weren't based on the Malibu. They were based on the Opel Vectra B and manufactured at a GM plant in Wilmington, Delaware.
#163 of 874
Re: [imidazol97] by dtownfb
Jan 05, 2009 (9:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Jan 05, 2009 6:54 am)

You could be right, it was 9-10 years ago and my memory is foggy because I owned a 2001 malibu and tryin to forget that experience (the most disappointing car I have ever bought). I know it shared many components with the Malibu since many of the problems that plagued that version of the Malibu was repeated in the L-series.
#164 of 874
L-Series by anythngbutgm
Jan 05, 2009 (10:27 am)
Reply
The L-series was heavily based on the Opel Vectra. SO in some ways, the Malibu connection is legit as it is now based on the Saturn Aura which in of itself is also a Vectra.
 
Good thing about the Saturn is that while the Malibu makes its living off supprting the rental market, the midsize Saturns do relatively little fleet sales.
#165 of 874
Re: [dtownfb] by fezo
Jan 05, 2009 (10:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: dtownfb (Jan 05, 2009 9:52 am)

My sympathies. I remember one of those as a rental. Underwhelming to say the least.

Messages Page 17 of 88
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
...
88
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement