Sign In Join 



What if you were in charge of GM?

874 messages,  Last post on Oct 28, 2009 at 10:20 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Classic Cars, Concept Cars, Future Vehicle


Messages Page 14 of 88
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
88
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#127 of 874
Re: Wouldn't want to be in charge... [gagrice] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Dec 03, 2008 (7:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 03, 2008 7:32 am)

And who has a clue as to how our economy works? Is he hiding?
 
You don't have to worry about a "looming" recession. It's here.
 
November Sales Numbers are grim, but MINI is actually UP and Subaru is down just a few percent, and Lincoln is in a single digit decline, while most are down 30-40%.
 
I wonder what MINI and Subaru and to some extent Lincoln are doing right to hold the line here?
 
Anything that GM could emulate?
#128 of 874
Re: Wouldn't want to be in charge... [Mr_Shiftright] by nippononly
Dec 03, 2008 (8:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 03, 2008 7:52 am)

With Mini and Subaru, it is easy to see that by lucky chance they cater to a demographic that is fairly recession-proof. In the case of the Mini I think it is because the Mini purchase is often a second or third car for very wealthy people. The wealthy are still wealthy - they are never the ones out on the street in hard times.
 
And Subaru happened to introduce the new Forester at exactly the right moment, and it just happened to be an unprecedented hit. They have stolen Toyota customers for sure this year. But also their own customer base hasn't been too badly affected so far, at least not in California. It's mostly teachers, college professors, and their ilk that buy Subarus right? Subaru certainly has not had to pour on the incentives in the latter half of the year as the domestics and Toyota have.
 
If I were a GM manager I wouldn't copy Toyota's lineup, they are down just as much as the market this year. All the biggest carmakers are bound to have a rough time in this type of economy. But if this current plan they have just released is the best my company can muster, I would resign today. This isn't a plan for major reform, it's just a slightly modified version of business as usual.
#129 of 874
Re: Wouldn't want to be in charge... [nippononly] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Dec 03, 2008 (8:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Dec 03, 2008 8:09 am)

My impression is that Subaru has captured the "sports and recreation" set---bicyclists, skiers, and of course foreign car buyers who live in inclement climates. Why buy a troublesome Audi or a hulking SUV when you can have that nice Forester or the Outback? You're right, they are in a perfect 'niche' but Subaru is not a big player.
 
MINI is just unique. There's nothing like it out there. You don't comparative shop a MINI. You either buy it or you don't.
#130 of 874
Re: Wouldn't want to be in charge... [nippononly] by nwng
Dec 03, 2008 (9:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Dec 03, 2008 8:09 am)

mini is not a 2nd or 3rd car for wealthy people. From what I see around here, most are driven by people in their mid 30's and younger. It's priced in a way that single people who can afford an accord would be looking at a mini, and why not? I would have if I'm 10 yrs younger and not toting around whinebag 1 and whinebag 2.
 
A pretty good size subie dealer closed their doors a couple weeks ago in the boston area, that was a suprise.
 
If GM wants to turn around their company in the near term, offer two brands: GM cars and GM trucks. from the GM aveo , to the GM corvette, from the GM traverse to the GM suburban. Offer a escalade option on the suburban and the rest of the caddy lineup can fold into the new GM car division. Sorry, but the caddy brand doesn't have any prestige in the real world anymore (1 successful car model (the CTS) cannot sustain a whole division).
 
Oh, while we're at it, give real names to cars, not acrynoms
#131 of 874
why are the ceo going to DC in hybrids? by nwng
Dec 03, 2008 (10:26 am)
Reply
toyota, honda and nissan all have products that beat them in that arena. They should be driving what they made best and show the american public (they desperately need their support) that they do make products that trump the foreign competitors. tricky rick could've arrive in an acadia or a regular malibu, mullay could use a flex or mks. the chrysler guy should just barrel in in a challenger srt8 or a wrangler. Hire a hollywood script writer and have a press conference/photo ops outside the capital steps to tell the american people here are only some of the great products that WE produce and more innovations are on the way, but we need you, the american people the support.......yadayadayada. In hindsight, the ceos could've also use their own pocket change and purchase a 15 minute primetime slot to ask for the american people's support, ala obama. Definitely put in a subtle patriotic theme in the infomercial. I gaurantee the big wigs at honda and toyota would pee in their pants if the above scenario was adopted by the detriot 3.
 
for the consultant fees, pls contact me via my email for wiring instructions
#132 of 874
Re: why are the ceo going to DC in hybrids? [nwng] by steve_ HOST
Dec 03, 2008 (10:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: nwng (Dec 03, 2008 10:26 am)

I'm picturing It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World - "a madcap cross-country rush to find some treasure" in the halls of DC.
#133 of 874
Re: why are the ceo going to DC in hybrids? [nwng] by bpizzuti
Dec 03, 2008 (11:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: nwng (Dec 03, 2008 10:26 am)

As I recall, Ford only has one hybrid, the Escape...which is a pretty steenking good hybrid, compared to GM's "mild" stuff. I'll agree that Waggy should be showing up in a Malibu, but make it the Malibu Hybrid, so people can see GM's excuse for a hybrid.
#134 of 874
Re: Wouldn't want to be in charge... [Mr_Shiftright] by gagrice
Dec 03, 2008 (1:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 03, 2008 7:52 am)

November Sales Numbers are grim, but MINI is actually UP and Subaru is down just a few percent, and Lincoln is in a single digit decline, while most are down 30-40%.
 
I see people losing their homes as a MUCH bigger problem than auto sales slump. I think VW is doing better than most. Especially their Jetta TDI.
 
As far as the recession goes. I don't see any less people on the highway or in the malls. They may not be buying a new car every three years and flooding the used car market like the last 3 years. The simple truth is we were using home equity and cheap credit to buy cars we really did not need.
 
If I was in charge of GM I would take a long look in the mirror and question the gene pool I was spawned from.
#135 of 874
I'll speak from the personal feelings ingrained as a 24 year old by jeffdtd
Dec 03, 2008 (6:23 pm)
Reply
So i'm currently in the market for a new vehicle, and while i'm not "objectively" opposed to purchasing american, there is nothing that I can reason myself into buying.
Chrysler= Hideous resale value, low safety ratings, less than average consumer satisfaction and number of problems. Love the design of the charger though. Chrysler's designs DEF. have more edge than the other two, the quality and refinement just needs to improve , together with the safetey.
 
Ford= if I wanted a truck, they'd be great. Unfortunately I don't. I also don't want an explorer. Or escape. Its not that they're ugly, they just haven't changed in appearance since the 1990's when my parents owned two explorers. I know they've evolved, but its just tired looking. I would love to buy a lincoln, just can't get one for $25k (my budget). I could almost afford the MKZ, but gee, when you look around the lot, it feels like an overpriced fusion. The actual fusion? its alright, just vanilla looking. Bland. The focus? No, im not in college and more, and there are plenty of other cars in that segment more attractive for the same money. I love the EDGE crossover, but hello? 17 MPG in the city? Really ford? And I also love Mustangs, but thats a niche product, not a mass appeal product.
I actually like Mercury's, but unfortunately in my market mercury has been farmed out to a nissan dealer who chooses not to really carry any mercurys.
 
GMC= I actually really appreciate some of the newer designs. The roadsters are nice. The smaller SUV's are alright. The malibu is alright. But what is their youth/young adult brand? Saturn and Pontiac? I trust Saturn 'SOMEWHAT'... I just remember the plastic panel poverty cars they were when I was a teenager.. they should be cheaper for the feeling they give you. As for Pontiac ? Where to begin. My babysitter had one when I was a kid that all the buttons fell off the dash, the door handles broke inside , the windows stopped working, and the speedometer failed. My mom had one that had transmission failure at several thousand and a fuel system problem that no one could solve. In 2004, my friend had a 2001 that to get it to crank she would open the hood and ram a stick in the engine. Then theres that terrible guy I use to know who couldn't get a date to save his life.. he bought one every two years. The newer pontiacs are designed well (atleast the ones that aren't copies of other models) , but, the brand recognition , for me as a serious targetable car buyer for the next 20 years, is hideous. They should ditch the pontiac logo and the name and just come up with a new youth brand... impress me. I don't mind knowing GM made my car, but I can't deal with the garbage reputations so much of their nameplates created for me growing up.
 
My summation to all this? Target the 20 and 30 year olds. Stop being conservative with designs, and don't be afraid to ditch your "Legacy" plans and brands .... if american's liked you and what you stand for, the bailout wouldn't be a question
#136 of 874
If I were in charge of GM by bwia
Dec 03, 2008 (7:22 pm)
Reply
I would seriously consider closing all U.S. based plants and manufacture Chevy, Cadillac and Saturn brands overseas. Both GM and Ford are profitable outside the U.S. As a matter of fact Ford just spent billions of dollars to build a state of art plant in Brazil, where they produce cars with non-union labor.
 
For years GM has been canibalizing its North American operations to finance plants in China and Europe. I think they should continue in that direction and along the way sell the relics and robots to India or the Russians.
 
One more point, I would focus all future R&D on a non-combustion engine. To do this in a big and comprehensive way I would spend $1 billion to engage all high school and college physics students around the world to work on a global replacement or solution for the combustion engine.

Messages Page 14 of 88
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
88
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement