Sign In Join


What if you were in charge of GM?

723 messages,  Last post on Jul 03, 2009 at 9:02 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Classic Cars, Concept Cars, Future Vehicle


Messages Page 13 of 73
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
73
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#117 of 723
Re: driving to the brink of ruin [Mr_Shiftright] by fezo
Dec 02, 2008 (5:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 02, 2008 4:40 pm)

That does make the eyes pop.
 
Then, after much talk to the contrary, their only elimination of brands is to try and sell Saab (who is buying?), well or kill Saturn (getting warmer) and make Pontiac a niche brand. Pardon me for saying so but hasn't the market already done that?
 
If Pontiac is a niche brand what the heck is Buick with three models? I'm getting confused...
#118 of 723
Re: driving to the brink of ruin [fezo] by fezo
Dec 02, 2008 (5:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Dec 02, 2008 5:06 pm)

Yikes! Just looked at the numbers for the month. They sold 852 Saabs in November. Yes, that's the whole country. What do you figure the market wants for that company?
#119 of 723
Re: driving to the brink of ruin [fezo] by bpizzuti
Dec 02, 2008 (6:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Dec 02, 2008 5:06 pm)

Needed: Chevy, Cadillac
 
Not needed: any brand not named Chevy or Cadillac.
 
When are they going to get this? Note that car company with the blue oval logo, which only has three core brands plus a Swede, and is doing mucho better than General Morons right now, with 6 brands plus a Swede? And that particular Swede sells nothing unique, so it's really 7?
 
I guess I'd do nothing if I were in charge of GM...apparently I don't meet the job requirements: my IQ is higher than 5.
#120 of 723
Re: driving to the brink of ruin [bpizzuti] by fezo
Dec 02, 2008 (6:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Dec 02, 2008 6:48 pm)

We could fix you up with a lobotomy...
#121 of 723
Re: driving to the brink of ruin [fezo] by bpizzuti
Dec 02, 2008 (7:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Dec 02, 2008 6:50 pm)

That would still leave it at 6, proving that I still have more brains in my little finger than Waggoner has in his entire head.
#122 of 723
Re: driving to the brink of ruin [Mr_Shiftright] by kernick
Dec 03, 2008 (7:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 02, 2008 4:40 pm)

Holy crap! 18 Billion!
 
That's no more the final number than - the Big Dig in Boston originally costing $3B. All that is, is something GM thinks is palatable to get the ball rolling. Once they get this money committed, it is easier to come back and say "we just $10B more every 6 months because the economy hasn't turned around". It is much easier to ask for $18B and $10B and $10B ... rather than to come in and say "we're going to need $75B for the next 3 years, and we'll have a hell-of-a-time making any profit, to repay any of the loan".
 
Check the history of the Big Dig or many other projects, and you'll see the "teaser amounts" given to get the project approved, and then how it snowballs from there. ABC actually carried a similar story last night, about the visitor center at the Capitol. That center would never have started (hopefully due to public outcry) if the real-cost had been told.
 
We're a bunch of saps, or just powerless, to believe the costs we're presented when approving these projects. Even here you see proponents of giving the Big3 $25B and that will be enough. Well that $25B figure lasted what, 2 weeks, before it was revised - which way? UP. What a surprise!!!
#123 of 723
Wouldn't want to be in charge... by lemko
Dec 03, 2008 (7:49 am)
Reply
...of GM as it is now. I also wouldn't want to be President as things are now.
#124 of 723
Re: Wouldn't want to be in charge... [lemko] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Dec 03, 2008 (7:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Dec 03, 2008 7:49 am)

It's beginning to look like the whole Big Three mess is going to fall on Obama's plate, doesn't it?
#125 of 723
Re: Wouldn't want to be in charge... [Mr_Shiftright] by gagrice
Dec 03, 2008 (8:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 03, 2008 7:58 am)

whole Big Three mess is going to fall on Obama's plate
 
That is where it belongs. He promised the Big 3 and the UAW he would fix the problem if they voted for him. Paybacks can be rough. Especially when you don't have a clue on how our economy works. I hope he has advisers that know what to do. I see another big Carter type recession looming.
#126 of 723
GM vs. Toyota by michaell
Dec 03, 2008 (8:43 am)
Reply
If, as everyone believes, that Toyota has the correct business model, then here is how I'd restructure GM. I'd match Toyota model for model:
 
Toyota = Chevrolet
Yaris = Aveo

Notes: Ick. Aveo, while priced right, really doesn't compete. I'd rather federalize the Corsa, convert a plant here in the states to build it, and be competitive.
 
Corolla = Cruze
Notes: With the right engines, this is quite possibly a shoot out. The 1.4L turbo engine has the possibility of being world-class in terms of power and efficiency.
 
Matrix = Vibe
Notes: A no-brainer, other than rebadging the Vibe as a Chevy. Same car, same plant, though I wonder how long Toyota will want to continue this partnership.
 
Camry = Malibu
Notes: As I see it, the Malibu is already as good as, if not better than, the Camry. Not much to do here.
 
Solara = G6 Coupe
Notes: A niche market. Improve the build quality of the G6, rebadge it as a Chevy and sell 20-30,000 per year. Same with the convertible version.
 
Avalon = Impala
Notes: Rebadge the Impala as a Caprice or, as an alternative, rebadge the current Buick Lucerne as a Chevrolet.
 
Prius = Volt
Notes: Figure out how to bring the Volt to market without having it cost $2-3 billion for development. Make it a unique body style - the current pictures of the Volt make it look like the Cruze. I think folks are starting to equate hybrids with 5-door hatchbacks (Prius, new Honda Insight).
 
Venza = SRX
Notes: Decontent and rebadge the SRX as a Chevy to compete.
 
Tacoma = Colorado
Notes: Update the powertrains and build quality in the Colorado to be competitive.
 
Tundra = Silverado
Notes: Nothing to do here; Silverado is already competitive.
 
RAV4 = VUE
Notes: Drop the Equinox and rebadge the VUE as a Chevrolet. Next iteration of the VUE needs to lose several hundred pounds.
 
FJ Cruiser = H3
Notes: Like the Solara, a niche market. May not matter, as I believe the FJ is slated for extinction.
 
Highlander = Traverse
Notes: Not quite direct competitors, but close enough.
 
4Runner = ???
Notes: With the demise of the TrailBlazer, there really isn't a direct competitor available from GM. Should there be?
 
Sequoia = Tahoe
Notes: None; Tahoe is competitive.
 
Land Cruiser = Suburban
Notes: Again, not a direct match up, but could be established that the Suburban is the "ne plus ultra" of the SUV set.
 
Sienna = none
Notes: GM has abandoned the minivan market. Why not bring over a people-mover from the European market and try again?
 
I need to think about the GM equivalents to Lexus (Buick or Cadillac) and Scion (Saturn?) and will post them later.

Messages Page 13 of 73
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
73
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement