You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Lexus RX 300/330/350
Lexus RX 350 versus Toyota Highlander Limited?

19 messages, Last post on Aug 22, 2009 at 9:51 AM
You are in the Lexus RX 300/330/350 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: player4 (Oct 07, 2008 9:06 am) BIG DIFFERENCE. The top-3 problems with our RX300 are : turning radius, cargo space, and flakiness of (lights, driver's visor, cup holders atop console.) CARGO SPACE IS ROTTEN ON THE RX300. We have gone camping 10x times. It's just tiny enough that our 7-year old kids have to put up with sleeping bags under their feet and/or a cooler on the floor between them !! When they turn 10 we're gonna be OUT OF LUCK !! My wife often has a backpack and/or paper bag under her legs in the front seat, or both !! And this is with the rear of the car PACKED with stuff, and we have a tiny tent, you can only fit 3 full-sized cardboard boxes in the rear of the car before you're in trouble !! I would love to have the ~7 cu ft extra cargo space in the Highlander !! If you camp with a family, STAY AWAY from the RX300, RX330, RX350, and RX400 series of cars !! STAY AWAY !! This is the greatest flaw in the RX3/4 series of cars ...
|
|
|
Replying to: systembuilder (Jul 24, 2009 9:50 pm) (FWIW, there are great deals on Suburbans and trailers right now. Personally, I really like the smaller size RX300, but it's not for everyone. It's a little more spacious than I normally need, and I appreciate a car that's more nimble than any of these. I value the RX's features that "spoil" my tastes like the much better sunroof, etc. I've gone camping with many different cars, but I usually take the motorhome when I need that much stuff. I've even camped out of the RX and slept inside. The load floor is flat and long, a Toyota wagon trademark it seems. So I've never ran out of room in the RX; never even used the roof rails I took off when I first bought the car new. The Highlander may share a common platform, but it's not the same as an RX, and I'm sure that's by design. The Lexus models have some really nice useful features that become endearing which are not available on cars like the HL. Little things that I use everyday, like the auto up and auto down on all windows and moonroof simultaneously remotely or activated inside and (via the lock) outside, to name one of many little tricks. I do miss the little extras when I'm not driving the RX. The newer RX's have many other tricks, too. But if you prefer a lower price and a little bit more cargo space and are annoyed by extra gadgets and don't care about things like an obviously better stereo with stock subwoofer, I can understand how the HL would be a better fit for you. If you need that much more cargo space than the RX provides, you may run out with the HL, too. If that happened to me, I'd look at minivans, which can hold lots more, and attain about as high MPG. But the RX is roomier than expected, and in no way cramped, even for larger people. I guess the Venza (with it's standard direct-injected 4 cylinder) is not even enough space??
|
|
|
Replying to: la4mead (Jul 24, 2009 10:30 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: systembuilder (Jul 24, 2009 9:50 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: sriss (Oct 06, 2008 3:06 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: jerry116 (Jul 25, 2009 11:40 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: markr346 (Jan 17, 2009 1:55 pm) |
|
| The Lexus has one of the best retained value histories in the industry, and that's why it is generally cheaper to own or lease the Lexus vs. the Highlander. If you like both cars, I'd go for the Lexus, cuz in reality it's cheaper to own. | |
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Lexus RX 300/330/350
Lexus RX 350 versus Toyota Highlander Limited?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2003 Lexus RX 300
2006 Lexus RX 330
2010 Lexus RX 350
2010 Toyota Highlander



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic