Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 2010 Mazda3
653 messages, Last post on Nov 12, 2009 at 2:07 PM
You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: backy (Jun 10, 2009 8:56 am) My Protege5 (5-spd manual) does 3,300 rpm at 70 mph! The engine noise is actually nice at that speed (I'm not a quiet car kinda person).....I love it on smooth roads and interstates.....it's the road/tire noise on not-so-smooth roads that gets tiring on long trips, LOL!
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: blackadder5639 (Jun 10, 2009 10:16 am) The 6th gear in the auto is an extra overdrive gear. This is essentially the gear that is missing from VW's 5 speed manual, so that is something you lose by taking the 5 speed manual in the case of the Jetta. As for passing, the auto is very smooth shifting and will quickly drop down when you step on it, there is also the option to down shift manually, by flipping over to tiptronic mode, in advance of a passing maneuver. The only minor gripe I have with the auto is I don't understand why they locked out 6th in sport mode...not a big deal since we pretty much just leave it in normal mode. Mazda is about the same, at least in the case of my version of the 6. My 4th gear in the 5 speed auto is nearly the same as 5th gear in the manual. |
|
|
Replying to: mz6greyghost (Jun 09, 2009 10:21 am) I am looking to buy a 2010 mazda3 (i touring). I will probably not have enough time to test drive the vehicle before i buy it (or atleast untill the day i plan to buy it). I just really need to know... Does the vehicle move?? For example, if im driving on the highway and traffic is moving at about 75mph slightly up hill and i want to pass someone, will i be able to easily?? Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: autonomous (Jun 09, 2009 2:23 pm) "Mazda also tried to improve performance and fuel efficiency by taking out weight. In key areas, Mazda swapped regular steel for more expensive and stronger high-tensile steel. So the structure is stronger and more rigid, yet less weighty. Still, the Mazda3 is heavier than a Toyota Corolla and Honda Civic, comparably equipped. Thus, fuel economy - 8.1 litres/100 km city/5.9 highway, using regular gas - is okay, but not outstanding. " The article generally praises the Mazda3 and concludes with the following: "That and good quality, solid safety scores and competitive pricing mean Honda cannot ignore the Mazda3 - not if Honda wants the Civic to own the top sales spot." In other words, the Mazda3 is a contender but has to work on issues like fuel economy to be the leader.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: autonomous (Jun 12, 2009 9:42 am) First of all, Mazda is heavier because it has a 2.3 or 2.5 engine vs. say Civice 1.8. However, you get a faster and a little more powerful car. The added weight is offset by Mazda's spirited engine, IMO 2nd, I get 35 miles/gal on the highway with my 09. I monitor closely with my gas, and I average (city and highway) 31/gal. A friend of mine actually gets 33/gal average, but he does a lot of little stuff to improve his gas mileage, I don't. To me, 31/gal average is EXTREMELY competitive.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: sonnyrocker (Jun 12, 2009 9:54 am) Yes, that's a good average. A few questions about your calculation. 1. How long a period does your average cover? Example: 6 months, 1 year. 2. For that period, did you calculate the total mileage travelled and the total fuel used? 3. Where was the car driven? Example: North Eastern US, Southern US |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: metsjets (Jun 11, 2009 7:47 am) Whether it meets your specific needs is a question that only you can answer! Take the time to test drive the 2.0L and see if it is quick enough for you. Test drive an 's' model (2.5L) for comparison also. |
|
|
Replying to: relldon (May 03, 2009 9:23 am) Did take one 900 mile round trip to ST Louis last month and hit 30/31MPG at an average speed 72-73MPH Also am still quite satisfied with this car thus far. It's not as quick as my old 2006 Passat with the 2.0L Turbo that I traded for it but the savings at the pump, now that I'm buying 87 octane vs. 93, more than makes up for that. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: hiwaystar (Jun 20, 2009 5:38 am) But on a side note...I thought the 2.5 requires high octane than 87, is it not?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: sonnyrocker (Jun 20, 2009 6:17 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 2010 Mazda3
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA3
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
