Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 2010 Mazda3
661 messages, Last post on Dec 04, 2009 at 10:29 PM
You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: backy (Jun 08, 2009 9:12 am) Toyota Corolla LE: 26/35 (132hp/128tq) , XRS 22/30 (158hp/162tq) Honda Civic: 26/34 (140hp/128tq) Ford Focus: 24/35 (140hp/132tq) Mazda3: i 25/33 (148hp/135tq) , s 21/29 (167hp/168tq) With far more power and better proven performance then the listed above competition, and at most a 1mpg city and 2mpg highway fuel economy disadvantage, I think it's an absolute joke to say that the Mazda3 is not on par with the competition. It's not like we are talking about 5 or 6 mpgs here. 1 to 2 is the difference. Give me a break.....
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Jun 08, 2009 10:24 am) The 2009 VW Jetta TDI 6-Speed: 30 City, 34 Combined, 41 Highway.  Best regards, Shipo
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Jun 08, 2009 10:39 am) I think it's weird though that Ford can get 34 mpg on a mid-sized sedan with an engine of comparable power to the Mazda3s, yet the Mazda3s gets 5 mpg less, yet is a lighter car. 
|
|
|
Replying to: shipo (Jun 08, 2009 10:45 am) 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: backy (Jun 08, 2009 10:57 am) Also, oddly, the Fusion with 2.5 (non S) is rated at 22/31, while the Mazda3 with 2.5 engine is rated at 22/29. Yet both are at 25 mpg combined. |
|
|
Replying to: shipo (Jun 08, 2009 10:45 am) I stand corrected!!! |
|
|
Replying to: backy (Jun 08, 2009 10:57 am) There is nothing wrong with wishing for that. In fact, I wish it were better as well. But, since the rest of the car is light years ahead of the others, it does not concern me. That is how Mazda builds and markets their cars. As far as the age of each design goes, the Corolla and Focus are little over a calender year old. The Civic is the only one due for a redesign, probably next year.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Jun 08, 2009 10:39 am) According to the EPA site (fueleconomy.gov), here are the combined ratings (that is a combination of highway and city driving) for several recent vehicles with automatic transmissions: 31 - 2009 Honda Fit 29 - 2010 Toyota Corolla ; 2009 Honda Civic (non-hybrid) 27 - 2009 Ford Focus ; 2010 Mazda3 i 25 - 2010 Mazda3 s ; 2002 MazdaProtege The difference between the top rank (35 mpg) and the lowest (25 mpg) is about 20%. Mazda has not significantly boosted the fuel economy of its Mazda3 s since 2002 (when the model was known as the Protege). The Mazda2 promises a welcome change on this front.
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Jun 08, 2009 1:12 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: unicorn62 (Jun 06, 2009 3:52 pm) The Mazda 3s is NOT an economy car. It is a compact, but it is meant to for buyers who want style, equipment, and some power in an attractive style and want only decent fuel economy........kinda like a poor man's 3-series. The Lancer (the current generation), Jetta and Rabbit/Golf are also similar. Given the performances of these cars, their fuel economy is very reasonable. Mind you, they are NOT economy cars. One Mazda 3i is perhaps an economy car. Its fuel economy figures are only 1 or 2 mpg lower than the Civic/Corolla competition, but it has at least 8 hp more! I think a loss of 1 or 2 mpg for 8 hp is worth it! Mazda could probably modify the gearing to get an extra 1 or 2 mpg (like the Focus), but then the character of the car would no longer be sporty enough to qualify as zoom-zoom! The question is whether or not the major priority for buyers of compact cars is fuel economy. Looking at the success of the Mazda 3, it appears like there is a considerable market for compact-but-not-economy cars. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 2010 Mazda3
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA3
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
