Sign In Join 



The Rebirth of Buick.........

421 messages,  Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 3:10 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 23 of 43
1
...
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
...
43
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#213 of 421
Re: an ugly little squid [imidazol97] by fezo
Mar 26, 2009 (5:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Mar 26, 2009 5:10 pm)

A well thought out, good value small Buick could be fine. If they just gussy up a Cruze it'll be a disaster.
#214 of 421
#211 of 213 Re: an ugly little squid [nippononly] by hpmctorque
Mar 27, 2009 (5:27 am)
Reply
"I have little to no faith that Buick will be able to avoid this pitfall."
 
Would that imply that GM has learned nothing about brand differentiation and segmentation since, say, the introduction of the X-cars in 1979?
#215 of 421
Re: an ugly little squid [andre1969] by lemko
Mar 27, 2009 (5:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Mar 26, 2009 12:51 pm)

Even the Aveo looks pretty nice inside for a cheap subcompact.
 
The Corsica was a coarse car and the Beretta was a disgraceful namesake for the fabled Italian gunmaker.
#216 of 421
Re: #211 of 213 Re: an ugly little squid [hpmctorque] by nippononly
Mar 27, 2009 (6:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Mar 27, 2009 5:27 am)

Would that imply that GM has learned nothing about brand differentiation and segmentation since, say, the introduction of the X-cars in 1979?
 
Little to nothing, yes.
 
It is obvious they are basing the new baby Buick on the Cruze. That's a bad start right away. I just don't see this as being the start of a resurgence of Buick, not even close.
 
If nothing else, look to the complete makeover of Saturn that has happened over the last two years. And Saturn still has.......declining customers, and so few of them that the Saturn brand has been cancelled. Buick has less customers than Saturn had BEFORE its makeover, and the "rebirth" is based on much less than Saturn's was.
#217 of 421
Re: #211 of 213 Re: an ugly little squid [nippononly] by andre1969
Mar 27, 2009 (9:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Mar 27, 2009 6:34 am)

It is obvious they are basing the new baby Buick on the Cruze. That's a bad start right away. I just don't see this as being the start of a resurgence of Buick, not even close.
 
This probably isn't the way to go either, but if they're just basing this thing on the Cruze, then IMO they should badge it as a Pontiac. That'll give the Buick/Pontiac/GMC dealers a small car to sell, and, well, nobody really expects a Pontiac to be a nicer car than a Chevy these days, anyway.
 
If Pontiac goes away totally though, I wonder if Buick would end up taking the same route Chrysler did? Once upon a time, Chrysler was a prestige brand, probably moreso than Buick, as they didn't do "small" big cars like the Buick Special/Century. Also, a Special was a lot cheaper than a Windsor, while the New Yorker was more expensive than a Roadmaster. Nowadays though, cars like the PT Cruiser, Sebring and the 2.7 version of the 300 really should be Plymouths.
 
So, if Pontiac went away totally, I guess I wouldn't gripe too much if they just badge-engineered a Cruze into a Buick, to give those dealers something to sell. I know I shouldn't encourage the badge-engineering that GM does, but if forced to choose, I'd buy a G5 over a Cobalt, and a Torrent over an Equinox...partly because I've always been more of a Pontiac fan, but also partly because I think they look nicer than their Chevy counterparts. I don't fool myself for an instant into thinking they're better cars than the Chevy versions...I just happen to prefer the style.
 
So I guess I could see a Buick fan choosing a Cruze derivative over the original, if looking for a small car. Still probably not the right route for Buick to go, though.
#218 of 421
Re: #211 of 213 Re: an ugly little squid [nippononly] by hpmctorque
Mar 27, 2009 (9:31 am)
Reply
I'd like to think otherwise, because you'd think that all the pain,humiliation and stress of the past several years would be jolting wake-up call, but you may be right. Going forward, I'm more concerned about the risk that Washington's involvement may force the automakers to produce cars that can't be sold profitably.
 
It'll be interesting to see how things unfold.
#219 of 421
Re: #211 of 213 Re: an ugly little squid [nippononly] by cooterbfd
Mar 29, 2009 (11:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Mar 27, 2009 6:34 am)

".....It is obvious they are basing the new baby Buick on the Cruze. That's a bad start right away. I just don't see this as being the start of a resurgence of Buick, not even close."
 
See, it's a statement like this that would leave me to believe that the "baby Buick" should just go away, never to see the light of day. I would agree, if it is based on the "Cruze", it's bad. But to base it on the "delta" archetecture that underpins the Cruze, is not. Otherwise, how does GM build a "baby Buick" and make money?
#220 of 421
Re: #211 of 213 Re: an ugly little squid [hpmctorque] by imidazol97
Mar 29, 2009 (11:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Mar 27, 2009 9:31 am)

>I'm more concerned about the risk that Washington's involvement may force the automakers to produce cars that can't be sold profitably
 
I'm sure Barney Frank, Waters, Dodd, Pelosi, and Reid all can handle business matters very well.
#221 of 421
Re: #211 of 213 Re: an ugly little squid [imidazol97] by fezo
Mar 29, 2009 (12:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Mar 29, 2009 11:51 am)

Automakers don't seem to need any help whatsoever in producing cars that can't be sold profitably. It's an area they seem to excel.
#222 of 421
Re: #211 of 213 Re: an ugly little squid [cooterbfd] by berri
Mar 29, 2009 (5:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Mar 29, 2009 11:22 am)

I'm thinking a small Buick only makes sense when gas gets up near $4 again. Then there may be a market for a smaller 4 cyl luxury car. They will need to give it a much smoother and quieter suspension and ride from the Chevy, and go up market on the interior. Eventually as gasoline prices rise, mid size will become the next full size opening up the compact segment to upscale cars, but I don't know that we are there yet? Of course, if alternative cars like hybrids or hydrogen fuel cells make major strides in cost reduction then this may not happen, but I think that may be further out than the return of $4 gas. Whatever GM does, don't Cadillac Cimaron it again!!!

Messages Page 23 of 43
1
...
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
...
43
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement