Sign In Join


The Rebirth of Buick.........

237 messages,  Last post on May 14, 2009 at 8:37 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News


Messages Page 15 of 25
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
25
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#133 of 237
It's here........ by cooterbfd
Jan 08, 2009 (5:22 pm)
Reply
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/autoshows/detroit/2009/2010buicklacrosse.html?- tid=edmunds.il.home.photopanel..2.*
 
Any comments?????
#134 of 237
Re: It's here........ [cooterbfd] by berri
Jan 08, 2009 (5:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Jan 08, 2009 5:22 pm)

I've read speculation that they are going to price it like an Acura or Lexus. If that's the case I don't think it will be that successful. However, if it is in Accord/Camry V6 territory it may sell alright. I see some Malibu styling cues on it inside and out.
#135 of 237
Re: It's here........ [berri] by cooterbfd
Jan 08, 2009 (7:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: berri (Jan 08, 2009 5:46 pm)

Well, considering that Camcord V6 territory is around $30K, that sounds reasonable.
#136 of 237
Re: It's here........ [cooterbfd] by nippononly
Jan 08, 2009 (8:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Jan 08, 2009 5:22 pm)

2 tons for the FWD, a 4200-pound curb weight for the AWD? Yikes, that's heavier than some trucks. All except the CXS will get a 3L engine with 211 lb-ft of torque to push all that steel around? They called the Five Hundred slow off the line when it was pushing 3600 pounds around with that much torque and displacement, and that was four years ago.
 
Is it a bit of a price shock to jump to a base price of $30K so quickly, and how does that align with pricing for the Lucerne?
#137 of 237
Re: It's here........ [nippononly] by hpmctorque
Jan 09, 2009 (6:05 am)
Reply
The weight of the 2010 LaCrosse bothers me too. However, you don't mention even one positive about this car. I think the interior and exterior looks good, for example. The direct injection and 6-speed automatics are also leading edge.
#138 of 237
Re: It's here........ [nippononly] by andre1969
Jan 09, 2009 (7:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Jan 08, 2009 8:33 pm)

Good lord, 4200 lb?! That's about what my '85 Silverado weighs!
#139 of 237
Re: It's here........ [andre1969] by lemko
Jan 09, 2009 (8:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Jan 09, 2009 7:54 am)

All cars are too heavy nowadays. I'm pretty sure my girlfriend's LaCrosse outweighs my '88 Park Ave and my Cadillac DTS Performance feels like a Tiger tank compared to my '89 Brougham. Geeze, 4200 lbs? What does a 1979 New Yorker weigh? That figure sounds only a few hundred pounds short of my 1979 Park Avenue.
#140 of 237
Re: It's here........ [lemko] by andre1969
Jan 09, 2009 (9:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Jan 09, 2009 8:01 am)

According to specs I've seen, the base weight of a 1979 New Yorker is 3850 lb. I'm wouldn't be surprised if mine is still above the 4,000 lb mark. One thing I'm a bit unclear on is whether a/c was standard on a NYer or not that year. That alone could easily account for 100 lb or more. And I imagine the 5th Ave has enough insulation, padding, and other crap to pork it up a bit over the base NYer.
#141 of 237
"Re: It's here........ [andre1969] (lemko) by hpmctorque
Jan 09, 2009 (9:30 am)
Reply
"All cars are too heavy nowadays."
 
That's true, but 4,000-4,200 lbs. may set a new record for a mid-price car. That begs the question, what will the next Lucerne and large body cadillac weigh?
 
My first reaction is that the weight figures are disappointing for a car that seems to otherwise be very competitive. However, let's see if the inside dimensions, trunk space and other attributes justify or mitigate the porky aspects before we pass final judgment on this new LaCrosse.
#142 of 237
Re: "Re: It's here........ [andre1969] (lemko) [hpmctorque] by andre1969
Jan 09, 2009 (10:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Jan 09, 2009 9:30 am)

One thing I'll say in defense of the current Malibu and Aura, which are also pretty porky for their size, is that they do seem like very sturdy cars. When you close a door, it just has an extra-solid feel to it. The area around the door openings, such as the lower sills and such, also seems extra thick.
 
So if the new LaCrosse is built on this same platform, it's just taking that solid feeling to new highs?
 
As for interior room, one area of criticism I've seen pointed out with the Aura and Malibu is the tight shoulder room, especially in the back seat. I think it's only something like 53.7", which is probably about the same as a 1980's Grand Am or Calais. Way too tight for 3-across seating, although IMO truly comfy 3-across seating went out in the 1970's with downsizing.
 
So if this new LaCrosse is targeted as an upscale car, rather than a mainstream family car, the tight shoulder room might not be too much of a concern.

Messages Page 15 of 25
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
25
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement