You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
The Rebirth of Buick.........

418 messages, Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 3:57 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: dtownfb (Sep 22, 2008 5:38 pm) Just to show how far Buick has fallen...in 1983, they actually outsold Ford!
|
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Sep 22, 2008 5:42 pm) Wow!!! I couldn't find numbers that far back.
|
|
|
Replying to: dtownfb (Sep 22, 2008 6:07 pm) The 1980-83 period was a bad time in general for the domestic auto industry, but GM weathered it pretty well. Chrysler was actually back on track by 1983, paying their gov't secured loans in full that year, way ahead of schedule. But they were also a leaner company, and learning to survive on smaller volume. Ford was actually a wreck around that timeframe, too, but their troubles weren't as well publicized as Chrysler's. Anyway, in 1981 I think it was, Oldsmobile slipped past Ford and into the #2 position, and then Buick slipped into #3 for 1983. By 1984 though, Ford was on the rebound, as the economy improved, sales of the aero T-bird took off, and the Tempo proved a sales hit. I think they moved ahead of Buick for 1984, and then ahead of Olds for 1985, and a few years later they were outselling Chevy. |
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Sep 21, 2008 4:13 pm)
|
|
|
I have owned numerous Buicks, the last was the 95 Riviera. I liked the Buicks because I got a lot of the stuff that was otherwise only available on Cadilliacs, such as fully automatic climate control. The interiors were nice, but not overstuffed like the Olds Regency or Cadillac d'Elegance. But the 95 Riviera interior was too plastic for my taste, as was the 98 Aurora. I think that the Cadillac interiors on my 2002 Seville and my 2007 SRX are closer to what Buicks should have. I don't know if Buick's sales decline is related to the cheapening of the interiors or if it is a result of Buick offering very few models in the last ten years. Before Olds was dumped, Buick only offered the midsize and full size cars, basically two platforms. Now they offer three platforms.
|
|
|
Replying to: sls002 (Sep 23, 2008 6:18 am) It seems the Allante was as close to an SL as a period SL was to a gullwing. GM was arguably at its most clueless in the late 80s and early 90s. And that's saying something. |
|
|
Replying to: sls002 (Sep 23, 2008 6:27 am) |
|
|
|
|
so-called "Top 10 Production Vehicles" (of all time), for its centennial, and Buick doesn't bear a mention: http://www.autoobserver.com/2008/09/gm-chooses-its-best-ever-cars-money-making-t- - rucks-noticeably-absent.html#more Indeed, Saturn, Cadillac, Chevy, and Pontiac all make the list with at least one vehicle, heck even SAAB makes the list (with a vehicle that was designed WAAAAY before GM had ANYTHING to do with Saab), but Buick gets dis(mis)sed... ...the list does not represent top sellers or anything, as the Silverado also is not on it. I guess I don't see the case for Buick being anything more than a Chinese division of GM in future, and if GM has nothing good to say about them for the centennial, maybe they are thinking the same way?
|
|
Buick would get a lot more consideration if they would just raise gas mileage figures by 8-10 ^
|
|
|
Replying to: nippononly (Sep 23, 2008 8:25 am)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
The Rebirth of Buick.........
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats