You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Article Comments - 2009 VW Tiguan vs. 2008 Honda CR-V vs. 2008 Toyota RAV4

67 messages, Last post on Oct 20, 2009 at 4:33 AM
You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
2009 Volkswagen Tiguan vs. 2008 Honda CR-V vs. 2008 Toyota RAV4 - So what's a utility-lovin' small family to do? Downsize. Full-size SUVs provide unmatched capability but their thirst may make you reassess your needs. Think compact utility vehicle. Think crossover. (more)
|
Look, I don't have anything against the CX-7, it is attractive and seems like a fine vehicle. I could never consider buying one because the headroom is inadequate. Does that make it bad for you? Of course not. These "comparison" discussions are such silly pissing matches at times. FWIW I didn't "insist" on comparing different trim levels, your original post I responded to said nothing about the CX-7 being fully loaded or not. If you want all that stuff, fine with me. I was saying that I got everything I wanted for under $25K, and that for $32K the CX-7 better damn well be better equipped or something is wrong. And you can talk about heated seats etc. all you want, but none of that changes the fundamentals. I repeat: "I've got a 269 hp AWD vehicle with enough headroom for me (which the Mazda does not have) that gets 28 mpg highway on regular gas and can tow 3500 pounds without breaking a sweat. To my knowledge, there simply is not another vehicle out there that can do all that." I used to have a Tahoe, and the RAV4 does 95% of what the Tahoe could do (lacking only some of the towing capacity, which isn't a big deal for me as I don't have any heavy boats/trailers) for about 60% better gas mileage. That's a win in my book. May your CX-7 please you as much as the RAV4 has pleased me. |
|
|
Replying to: sdc2 (Sep 18, 2008 10:00 am) And it doesn't change you trying to justify what you paid over what I was mentioning for a fully loaded CX-7. Your comment was totally unwarranted. fundamentals? The AWD is worthless. period. The transmission is outdated, it's interior is bland, and uses some lower grade plastics. Wow it has that 269HP V6! Well guess what, I bet you don't use ANY of those horses getting anywhere near good fuel economy. The 2011 CX-7 will manage 22/30MPG. And I already know for a fact that you will not get 26(AWD is 26 if you didn't know)mpg towing 3500lbs. The CX-7 can use regular and even on premium gas, the CX-7 is little more than $500 a year to run, goodness! expensive premium gas! Please. Yeah I can get in a pissing match, because I love them. |
|
|
Replying to: cx7lover (Sep 20, 2008 8:59 pm) Neither vehicle is a heavy duty offroader. When the RAV was compared to all the other cute-utes ( CX7 not included ) it beat them all. Despite your prejudice in favor of the CX7 not very many people are taking it seriously. And thats just the facts. In the end it's not a beauty pagaent, it's a business - where the only valid measures of success are units sold and profit. To succeed thusly the product that's best is the one that best matches the complete needs of the buying public in terms of room, performance, reliability, style and price. The RAV does that better than the CX7 thus it generates more units sold and profit.
|
|
|
Replying to: sdc2 (Sep 17, 2008 6:05 am) |
|
|
|
| seems like the tiguan is the most fun to drive, has the nicest interior, and has more equipment but it loses because it's cost more??? isn't there a saying you get what you pay for? they didn't even mention the tiguans panoramic sunroof, dynaudio soundsytem, bi-xenon headlights with afs? i think it's a poor review IMO | |
| Why not include the 09 Forester in these comparisons. It is also based off a car platform and has been in numerous comparison tests. I believe a Turbo Forester is much better than the Rav-4 | |
|
|
|
Replying to: cx7lover (Sep 20, 2008 8:59 pm) The hosts do not. And I already know for a fact that you will not get 26(AWD is 26 if you didn't know)mpg towing 3500lbs. Well duh, towing its max rating nothing will get what it is rated. That's obvious. |
|
|
Replying to: kdhspyder (Sep 21, 2008 2:58 pm) MAZDA COULDN'T BUILD THEM 200,000 PEOPLE WANTED THEM! THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE THE DEALER NETWORK TO SUPPORT SUCH A DEMAND. LOL! THEY ARE NOT MAINSTREAM. GET A GRIP. |
|
| Where is the love? | |
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Article Comments - 2009 VW Tiguan vs. 2008 Honda CR-V vs. 2008 Toyota RAV4
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Volkswagen Tiguan
2010 Honda CR-V
2011 Toyota RAV4



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats