Sign In Join 



Manual transmission options

13 messages,  Last post on Nov 10, 2008 at 7:30 AM

You are in the Mazda Mazda5 Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDA5, Van


Messages Page 2 of 2
1
2
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#9 of 13
Re: Manual transmission options [vg33e power] by hoop1a
Oct 24, 2008 (1:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: vg33e power (Oct 21, 2008 6:34 am)

My rationale is that people who want a manual transmission these days want it because they are driving enthusiasts, not because they are too cheap to buy automatics.
 
With that in mind, if you are only going to offer it on one model, it should probably be a higher spec one (the GT).
 
I just mentioned the RAV4 because it was a similar situation of not being able to get performance and amenities together. The lack of a manual transmission is my biggest problem with the RAV4.
#10 of 13
Re: Manual transmission options [hoop1a] by vg33e power
Oct 24, 2008 (3:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hoop1a (Oct 24, 2008 1:24 pm)

AHH! Got ya! Sorry...
#11 of 13
Re: Manual transmission options [abarry90] by whobodym
Nov 08, 2008 (2:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: abarry90 (Sep 11, 2008 2:07 pm)

I have had a 5M MZ5 Touring since March 2006, 38,000 miles. Yes the shifter looks like it's in a funny high place, but the whole car is pretty tall, and the seat height is almost as high as a crossover SUV. I've always driven Japanese/German compact stick shift cars (Accord, Integra, Jetta, Scirocco) and the MZ5's gearshift feels totally in the right place to me and my wife. (we are both on the big side, 5'8" & 6'2")
 
On the other hand, the linkage shift precision feel is not quite up to Honda standards. It works fine but a little more vague and mushy feeling than my Integra.
#12 of 13
Re: Manual transmission options [abarry90] by whobodym
Nov 08, 2008 (2:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: abarry90 (Sep 11, 2008 1:51 pm)

perhaps we can take heart from the recent Consumer Reports brief article on Manual Transmission performance and economy advantages - I think it was the Nov 08 issue. CR has tended to ignore this subject over the past 5 years but I think it deserves more publicity. They found, and my experience meshes, that EPA mileage estimates do not seem to show the real world MPG benefits that stick shifts really do give us. I am a spreadsheet-geek so I have kept track of my mileage, every tank. Our '06 MZ5 Touring 5M has burned 1608.8 gallons over 38,000 miles. That's 23.4 mpg overall for what has mostly been city driving. We live in Seattle proper, not the suburbs. We've only taken it outside King County a few times, the Redwoods being the farthest. Then there is the acceleration benefit. CR listed a half-dozen models like Accord and Civic, and the 0-60 times were all 1-2 seconds better for the manual versions of the same cars.
 
Now, what might be nice would be a Mazda 5 Grand Touring with the 6 speed manual and 2.0L engine. This is a configuration already sold in Europe I think, and I bet it could be set up to give quite a bit better MPG and be almost as fast. I bet we have barely begun to see what all the car company marketing departments can do to get back in the High Mileage mood they emphasized in the 70s and 80s.
#13 of 13
Re: Manual transmission options [whobodym] by vg33e power
Nov 10, 2008 (7:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: whobodym (Nov 08, 2008 2:25 pm)

...or how about a Mazda5 Grand Touring 6-MT with the CX-7's 2.3L Turbo and AWD. Now that would make it the ultimate MZ5 in my books.

Messages Page 2 of 2
1
2
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement