Sign In Join 



Do You Favor A Government Loan To The Detroit 3?

3958 messages,  Last post on Oct 02, 2009 at 4:52 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Legislation


Messages Page 383 of 397
1
...
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
...
397
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3817 of 3958
Re: Let's [tlong] by nvbanker
May 07, 2009 (8:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: tlong (May 06, 2009 10:33 pm)

What I wonder about is why the ratings agencies (Moody's, etc.) didn't downgrade the credit sooner. Why didn't the ridiculously expensive Sarbanes-Oxley controls warn us that the D3 and especially the banks were all just houses of cards? That's where we should throw our ire. The bondholders of GM and C debt were idiots.
 
I completely agree.
#3818 of 3958
Even if they get out of the woods..... by ruking1
May 07, 2009 (11:58 am)
Reply
Porsche and Volkswagen Consider a Full Merger
 
link title
#3819 of 3958
Re: How's this for a RADICAL idea?... [gagrice] by cooterbfd
May 07, 2009 (1:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (May 06, 2009 5:49 pm)

Gary, the only thing is, if the Gov't is indeed the top of the totem pole, and let's say they get forced into Ch 7, and the gov't insists on being made whole, and the judge agrees, then I doubt there are enough assets to sell to even make that happen. Then, we get whatever we can, and the bond and shareholders get zippo, (not even the lighter).
 
I think it's in everyone best interest to make this happen, and then make it work. At least then, at 10% equity, the bondholders have an opportunity to make their money back, and then some.
 
BTW, as far as the GM stock thing, I thing the 100-1 stock swap is for regular shareholders only. The formula they are using would allow shareholders to end up with a grand total of 1% of all outstanding shares.
#3820 of 3958
Re: How's this for a RADICAL idea?... [imidazol97] by circlew
May 07, 2009 (3:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (May 06, 2009 7:37 am)

They know good cars when they drive them. The US auto industry is past life support.
 
The baby is out with the bathwater. Time to stamp a new logo on the steel already in inventory.
 
Regards,
OW
#3821 of 3958
Re: How's this for a RADICAL idea?... [kdhspyder] by circlew
May 07, 2009 (3:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (May 06, 2009 2:54 pm)

 
That equity stake is akin to a Ponzi scheme...a sure bet,no doubt! I'm not buying!!
 
WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Financial analysts are casting doubt on General Motors Corp.'s (GM) ability to repay billions of dollars in U.S. government loans, given the company's debt load and sales outlook.
 
GM has acknowledged it can't repay the U.S. loans in the original time frame. It is proposing that the Treasury Department accept majority ownership (51%) of the company in exchange for wiping out about $10 billion in debt. Discussions are ongoing.
 
But even with a large equity stake, the government risks losing at least some of the $15.4 billion it has lent GM since January, analysts said.
 
It would likely take years of profits and a significant appreciation of the company's value for the government to recoup all of its money, analysts said. That time frame would appear to conflict with the Obama administration's insistence that any government takeover of the company be short-lived.
 
"Should a GM bankruptcy not proceed as the government wishes, or demand for GM automobiles doesn't rebound, there is an outsized risk that the government could sustain substantial losses," said Joe Brusuelas, a director at Moody's Economy.com. He called the original decision to lend to GM risky given the company's condition.
 
Aaron Bragman, an automotive analyst with the consulting company IHS Global Insight, said that with a stake in the company, the U.S. government "will be left to wait, and hope that GM can pull out of this nosedive and be a successful company when this is done."

 
Regards,
OW
#3822 of 3958
Re: How's this for a RADICAL idea?... [gagrice] by circlew
May 07, 2009 (3:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (May 06, 2009 3:09 pm)

The money is gone but NOT FORGOTEN!
 
Regards,
OW
#3823 of 3958
Re: How's this for a RADICAL idea?... [kdhspyder] by circlew
May 07, 2009 (3:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (May 06, 2009 4:18 pm)

Correct....but sales will never rebound in volumes necessary. That obviates any debt repayment in our lifetime since sales will not cover the debt, let alone operating expenses.
 
The Obama administration has already acknowledged that it likely won't recoup $4 billion it lent to Chrysler this winter, conceding the loan was made to a deeply leveraged company "where there was probably never much hope of seeing much recovery." In addition, Chrysler probably won't be able repay in full $4.5 billion in bankruptcy financing from the U.S. and Canadian governments, an adviser to the auto maker said at a court hearing earlier this week
 
Sayonara bailot $$$$.
 
Regards,
OW
#3824 of 3958
Re: Let's [tlong] by circlew
May 07, 2009 (3:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tlong (May 06, 2009 10:33 pm)

You only win a s a debt holder is you have the CDS trump card.
 
As General Motors (GM) teeters on the edge of bankruptcy, there are issues at play that are unique in today's market, and bring to the forefront some somewhat unknown financial instruments that are causing some bond-holders to root for the auto-maker to go belly up.
 
So, the hot air or gas is about to have a match put to it in a few weeks, like it or not...after all, what's a few billion dollars among friends, RIGHT?
 
Regards,
OW
#3825 of 3958
Re: How's this for a RADICAL idea?... [circlew] by kdhspyder
May 07, 2009 (4:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (May 07, 2009 3:47 pm)

I don't think that the money lent to them will be repaid as loans - ever. I do think that if the two companies are freed of their burdens that they can make good money as smaller companies. Such companies will at some point be attractive to other investors if they show consistent earnings records. If they do become money-makers then they will have value that can be sold off to other sharp investors.
 
If they can't ... then yes our loans/investments are at severe risk.
 
I think though that making a profit with the right structure is not all that hard to do. It's not a really complicated business if the structure of the company is correct. We the public love our vehicles we are willing buyers. Whether we can recover the full $8.5 Billion that will have been dumped into Chrysler or the $30 Billion that will be the final tab at GM remains to be seen.
 
The alternate is cratering the economies of several Midwestern states and dumping nearly a million retirees on the healthcare systems and their pensions on the PBGC.
#3826 of 3958
Re: How's this for a RADICAL idea?... [kdhspyder] by circlew
May 07, 2009 (4:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (May 07, 2009 4:10 pm)

Well, seeing their cash reserves will last 102 days at the Q1 2009 burn rate, the economies that relay on this company are on a freight train heading for a wall with no brakes.
 
ANY new business model that becomes viable will never support the old economies of those states. I said long ago that the wasted money shoveled to GM and C should have supported the folks on the freight train, not a failed business model that should have died 5 years ago.
 
Simply, bad decisions were made. There is no need to ask a Supreme Court Judge, Congress or the President of the United States to clearly see that.
 
Like I said, buying a car from these companies is a shade of a Ponzi scheme, IMHO. You already lost your money going in!!!
 
Regards,
OW

Messages Page 383 of 397
1
...
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
...
397
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement