Sign In Join 



Do You Favor A Government Loan To The Detroit 3?

3958 messages,  Last post on Oct 02, 2009 at 4:52 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Legislation


Messages Page 269 of 397
1
...
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
...
397
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2674 of 3958
Re: Chrysler cost cutting [kdhspyder] by gagrice
Mar 02, 2009 (7:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Mar 02, 2009 6:18 am)

The fact is that as it has happened during the entire history of country the new more efficient jobs have moved from the unionized North-Central rust belt to the non-union sunny South. Nothing new to see here it's been happening here ever since the textile mills moved out of Mass, RI and CT in the 19th Century. This is the history our country.
 
That statement needs to be repeated. You are exactly correct. The work has never stayed in one place too long. Well maybe the auto industry stayed in Michigan too long. They actually believe building cars is their right. Even GM in their infinite ignorance could not manage to get it right. They do not deserve a nickel of our money. That includes all the entities lined up to steal from the tax payers.
#2675 of 3958
Re: a better way [chikoo] by anythngbutgm
Mar 03, 2009 (5:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: chikoo (Mar 02, 2009 12:16 pm)

With 10K voucher, you can buy a Cadillac for the price of a Corolla, a Malibu for the price motorbike
 
Or you could buy a year or two old used model that has taken the similar deep depreciation hit.
#2676 of 3958
Re: a better way [anythngbutgm] by gagrice
Mar 03, 2009 (6:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: anythngbutgm (Mar 03, 2009 5:26 am)

That is a legitimate point. Whatever a car is discounted by will be taken from the resale value. If they set the content minimum at 80% it will eliminate all but 3-4 models.
#2677 of 3958
Re: a better way [kdhspyder] by chikoo
Mar 03, 2009 (8:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Mar 02, 2009 2:24 pm)

>The voucher system aimed only at the D3 will never get off the ground. Why?
 > It's taxpayers money first.
 
The bailout money is also taxpayers money, lest you forget.
#2678 of 3958
Re: a better way [chikoo] by kdhspyder
Mar 03, 2009 (8:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: chikoo (Mar 03, 2009 8:34 am)

Ahh .. the difference though is that the bailout money is a loan. From that loan we the taxpayers, including Toyota, Honda, MB, BMW will / should make a profit in lending it to GM. This is good business.
 
The voucher system is a gift of taxpayer money to the D3. It never has to be paid back and there is no profit to be made from giving it away. It'll never fly.
#2679 of 3958
Re: a better way [chikoo] by kernick
Mar 03, 2009 (9:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: chikoo (Mar 03, 2009 8:34 am)

The bailout money is also taxpayers money, lest you forget.
 
We've already been thru this discussion a few weeks ago. It is not correct to say it's okay to make another bad decision, based on the fact that a bad decision was made before. The government loans to the D3 or any other company in the private sector is not normal, benefitting some citizens and hurting others. Supporting GM and Chrysler hurts those companies competitors, by lowering the competitors sales. Government should be neutral, setting equal and fair rules (emissions, CAFE, ...) for all to follow - that's it .
 
I sincerely think that by trying to keep the entire D3 in business, they are hurting the chances of 1 or 2 of them coming out of this depression healthy. By supporting Chrysler and GM, they are keeping some people from going to Ford to buy their products. What the government is going to end up with on a course of loans, is all of the D3 being small and losing money, and requiring loans.
 
If loans continue, we'll end up with 3 too large car companies, with high costs, borrowing money, instead of 1 or 2 bigger companies that are fairly healthy, and have enough business to support their legacy and current costs.
 
I would also like to see if 1 or 2 of these corporations go under, that some individuals with some new ideas on how to make and sell cars would then be able to buy a plant or 2 cheap, and start a new company.
#2680 of 3958
Re: a better way [kernick] by steve_ HOST
Mar 03, 2009 (9:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: kernick (Mar 03, 2009 9:39 am)

I'm sure Chrysler would be happy to sell some folks a factory or two (or a baker's dozen of them), but good luck getting financing.
 
Starting a new company reminds me of Tesla Motors. They are out there, although sometimes it's hard to tell if they are selling cars or shares of stock.
 
So your poison is deciding whether to give a loan to a known failing company or loaning money to an unknown startup.
 
Then there's that third option where you fire sale everything (and even if you pick up a factory for peanuts, you'll still need some bucks to buy supplies and hire workers until you can turn your cash flow on).
 
That leaves some outfit like Chery or Tata I guess, assuming they have enough reserves to pick up the slack.
#2681 of 3958
Re: a better way [kdhspyder] by chikoo
Mar 03, 2009 (10:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Mar 03, 2009 8:50 am)

>Ahh .. the difference though is that the bailout money is a loan. From that loan we the taxpayers, including Toyota, Honda, MB, BMW will / should make a profit in lending it to GM. This is good business.
 
What I am proposing is also a loan, albeit only to the extent that vouchers are turned in. The regular bailout is all money upfront. If the voucher system is used, the only money that will loaned out will be dependent on the # of vehicles D3 sold.
Makes sense?
#2682 of 3958
Re: bailout GM? [steve_] by grbeck
Mar 03, 2009 (12:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Feb 28, 2009 8:12 am)

Actually, GM was offered the same opportunity as Ford, and GM management haughtily told the lenders it didn't need the money, as its upcoming, razzle-dazzle new vehicles would turn around the company.
 
We are now learning how well that one worked...
#2683 of 3958
Re: a better way [kernick] by kdhspyder
Mar 03, 2009 (7:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kernick (Mar 03, 2009 9:39 am)

I agree with all of this. I think Chrysler can't die soon enough. It has no future in this market and the management of Cerberus has already pulled the plug on making it into a world class competitor.
 
By it hanging around it's taking customers away from GM and F which also have to shrink btw. It's just that with C still sucking up customers for a while GM and F have to shrink more than they would otherwise.

Messages Page 269 of 397
1
...
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
...
397
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement