Sign In Join 



Do You Favor A Government Loan To The Detroit 3?

3958 messages,  Last post on Oct 02, 2009 at 4:52 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Legislation


Messages Page 164 of 397
1
...
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
...
397
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1623 of 3958
Re: Ford's tough [imidazol97] by elroy5
Dec 14, 2008 (7:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Dec 14, 2008 6:16 pm)

The comparison of "mainstream" cars, was only an illustration of how Detroit has not been building competitive cars. Which is a main reason they are in this predicament. When a buyer is out looking at midsize cars, the Accord and Camry (depending on which type of ride you want) are the best choices out there. A BAILOUT will not change this, and will only delay the inevitable. No amount of money will make Detroit's cars better at this point. It's way too late for that.
#1624 of 3958
Re: " The Road To Serfdom " [gagrice] by euphonium
Dec 14, 2008 (9:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Dec 13, 2008 9:42 pm)

A well tuned Knabe of your wife's piano age is a pleasure to play. Instruments made in the early 1900's were of superior quality. Another would be the Mason/Hamlin piano. Fischer comes to mind as another piano to keep.
 
Can you imagine the quality gap between the craftsmen of pianos then compared to the UAW today???
#1625 of 3958
Re: Ford's tough [dieselone] by gagrice
Dec 14, 2008 (9:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dieselone (Dec 14, 2008 2:58 pm)

That was the type of car I'd rather ride in than drive, because of numb steering, brakes, and nausea inducing float. But I know my grandpa loved that kind of ride.
 
That is why we see so many retired Navy guys driving Buicks and Caddys. It reminds them of life on the ocean. Floating over those big waves. I have to agree, it is better to ride in than drive. I like to feel the road more than is possible in a GM car.
#1626 of 3958
NO by djm2
Dec 15, 2008 (4:26 am)
Reply
Hi all: ---------------------------Give each adult a voucher of $10,000.00 to purchase a NEW American vehicle from either GM, Chrysler or Ford. These "vouchers" would have NO "cash value" outside of a vehicle purchase, and could only be used during a NEW vehicle purchase. ----(No used vehicles.) ---- This action would stimulate the economy from the bottom up, and get the American vehicle manufacturers a larger percentage of the "market share!" ----- It would take customers from Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Hyundai and Kia.
 
     Best regards. ---------- Dwayne
#1627 of 3958
Re: NO [djm2] by pf_flyer HOST
Dec 15, 2008 (4:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: djm2 (Dec 15, 2008 4:26 am)

What if someone doesn't WANT to buy a GM, Chrysler, or Ford vehicle? The great thing about capitalism is that we have a choice, and our choice determine things like market share.
 
Build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door. Giving away a mousetrap that consumers aren't buying in the numbers you want doesn't do anything to improve the perception of that product in the eyes of consumers.
#1628 of 3958
Re: Rather than being bailed out by the taxpayers [euphonium] by kdhspyder
Dec 15, 2008 (5:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: euphonium (Dec 13, 2008 11:32 am)

To encourage those buyers to actually get into a new vehicle though you'd also have to get them out of their current vehicles..
 
As you noted such a 50% discount on new vehicles would destroy the value of the USED car market....including all the used cars that are currently being driven by these potential buyers. If you've had your vehicle 2-3 years and like most owners you are not quite breakeven vs the loan balance if you reduce the value of what you're driving by $5000 - $10000 then you'll never qualify for another loan until the current one is paid in full.
 
Sell a brand spanking new Fusion for $12000???
 
That means that a 2006 with about 50K on the clock will be worth about $5000 yet your loan on it would still be ~ $12000+.
 
The typical buyer, the one who's being excluded from the market today is not well off. They don't have positive equity. They don't have any cashdown. They don't have great credit histories. This is the bread and butter buyer who buys every 2-4 years and the one that that the finance companies are currently discouraging from buying again.
 
Adding a worsend trade velue to the equation and that effectively excludes them for another 3-4 years.
#1629 of 3958
Re: Rather than being bailed out by the taxpayers [kdhspyder] by driver100
Dec 15, 2008 (5:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Dec 15, 2008 5:27 am)

But, what about dim's idea?
Hi all: ---------------------------Give each adult a voucher of $10,000.00 to purchase a NEW American vehicle from either GM, Chrysler or Ford. These "vouchers" would have NO "cash value" outside of a vehicle purchase, and could only be used during a NEW vehicle purchase. ----(No used vehicles.) ---- This action would stimulate the economy from the bottom up, and get the American vehicle manufacturers a larger percentage of the "market share!"
That might be better than giving loans to D3. Move some metal and keep the plants going. I won't be buying one but I'd rather have my tax dollars go that way than just go into a sink hole, at least some of that rusting metal will move and workers will build more.
#1630 of 3958
Re: NO [djm2] by alltorque
Dec 15, 2008 (5:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: djm2 (Dec 15, 2008 4:26 am)

Hi all: ---------------------------Give each adult a voucher of $10,000.00 to purchase a NEW American vehicle from either GM, Chrysler or Ford. These "vouchers" would have NO "cash value" outside of a vehicle purchase, and could only be used during a NEW vehicle purchase. ----(No used vehicles.) ---- This action would stimulate the economy from the bottom up, and get the American vehicle manufacturers a larger percentage of the "market share!" ----- It would take customers from Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Hyundai and Kia.
 
So many holes in this that it resembles a piece of Gruyere cheese. Where is the incentive for the Detroit 2.5 to improve their offering ? How do you address the used values mentioned elsewhere ? So you try and cripple Honda, Toyota etc by blatant protectionism of the D2.5 guys..............so what happens to those Americans employed at their USA plants & suppliers and the communities that depend on their spend and tax Dollars ?
 
I'd like to say the idea is half-baked but that would be massively overstating its worth.
 
Just an observation from the small island anchored off Europe.
#1631 of 3958
Re: NO [alltorque] by driver100
Dec 15, 2008 (6:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: alltorque (Dec 15, 2008 5:49 am)

Where is the incentive for the Detroit 2.5 to improve their offering ?
It will give the D2.5 some cash to survive a bit longer and get their bills paid. Also, will help the economy as it will move some metal and push sales.
How do you address the used values mentioned elsewhere ?
Used cars might get slightly cheaper and that might attract the buyer who still can't buy new, but needs a newer car.
So you try and cripple Honda, Toyota etc by blatant protectionism of the D2.5 guys
Honda and Toyota don't want to see the D2.5 go down, hurts the supply chain. Economy is bad and they aren't selling too many cars either. To keep America working maybe the public gets a $5000 coupon for other makes...I'd still buy the Honda.
..............so what happens to those Americans employed at their USA plants & suppliers and the communities that depend on their spend and tax Dollars
The idea might just get the economy moving again. Since the think tank guys haven't got a solution it is one that might just work, as crazy as it sounds.
By the way, if any one saw 60 minutes last night, we have just gone through the first wave of subprime mortgages, there is another one coming. Not sure what will happen when more people leave their homes and prices drop further......think I'll get under the covers and go back to bed
#1632 of 3958
Re: NO [driver100] by imidazol97
Dec 15, 2008 (6:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: driver100 (Dec 15, 2008 6:32 am)

> if any one saw 60 minutes last night, we have just gone through the first wave of subprime mortgages, there is another one coming
 
I don't watch the mainstream media anymore to see their brainwashing viewpoints (see election coverage by NBC and owned stations for reference). Did 60 minutes fix any blame for why all these owners were being given mortgages that they had no hope of paying off?

Messages Page 164 of 397
1
...
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
...
397
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement