Sign In Join 



Do You Favor A Government Loan To The Detroit 3?

3958 messages,  Last post on Oct 02, 2009 at 4:52 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Legislation


Messages Page 154 of 396
1
...
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
...
396
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1528 of 3958
Re: A point of clarification..... [dtownfb] by cooterbfd
Dec 12, 2008 (1:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dtownfb (Dec 12, 2008 12:18 pm)

".....yeah let's blame the government for GM and Chrysler's problems. I guess you didn't know that GM, Ford and Chrysler all used the HUGE loophole in the CAFE standards when they sold all those pickups and SUVs. See if a vehicle is over a certain weight, it does not count toward CAFE standards. Also the government gave GM, Ford and Chrysler extra credit for all the flex fuel vehicle they produced. Never mind that these vehicles actually got 25-33% less gas mileage fuel when using E85 fuel (which is only available at 1200 gas stations nationwide). But I guess you are right, the government made it impossible for them to make money."
 
Don't forget, the Asians, led by Subaru, used the loophole in the CAFE standards to declare their car based wagons as light duty trucks, thereby allowing them to guzzle a little more gas and not ruin their CAFE mileage on their cars.
#1529 of 3958
Re: Done for the year? [chikoo] by driver100
Dec 12, 2008 (1:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chikoo (Dec 12, 2008 1:23 pm)

If you want to steal, Rob billions from a bank, not 100's from an ATM machine.
'cause either way you are going to go to jail.

 
Nah, the guys that steal billions still get to run the companies they stole from. The jerk who robs a bank goes to jail.
#1530 of 3958
Re: Done for the year? [dtownfb] by cooterbfd
Dec 12, 2008 (2:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dtownfb (Dec 12, 2008 12:29 pm)

".....Understood. My point is to not let GM go out of business but have the government back Gm as they go through re-structuring."
 
I've wondered how it would work if the Gov't stepped in and negotiated a deal w/ their creditors (who already have billions of our money) that would have the US back the B3's debt in full, give them 24 months to start paying, in return for say a 5 or 10% stake in the company. This way, the B3 get 24 months of debt relief, creditors are guaranteed the money, the Gov't gets millions of shares in the companies to sell, yet NO MONEY ACTUALLY CHANGES HANDS right now.
#1531 of 3958
Re: A point of clarification..... [motorcity6] by berri
Dec 12, 2008 (2:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: motorcity6 (Dec 12, 2008 11:28 am)

If the right side had done it, someone would have been tarred and feathered by now..However Clinton started the mess with the rest of crew ...
 
I don't think its Republicans versus Democrats or conservatives versus liberals. Its really about a block of southern senators wanting D3 to fail so that there will be more business for the transplants located in their states. More transplants mean more southern jobs and tax revenues. I expect the northern senators will remember this. The south has way more per capita government monies than the north. Maybe we'll see some military or NASA location transfers down the road? In Washington, you don't get mad, you get even! I wonder if D3 survive if down the road things like the Bowling Green Corvette plant and Louisville Ford plant will have their work moved elsewhere? I expect there will eventually be payback.
#1532 of 3958
Re: Looking back, looking forward [cooterbfd] by chikoo
Dec 12, 2008 (2:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Dec 12, 2008 1:45 pm)

>The problem is that they don't meet US emission and safety standards. That is the main hangup w/ the Chevy Beat.
 
And I always thought Europe was the leader in emission standards.
Maybe the safety standards?
#1533 of 3958
Re: Looking back, looking forward [chikoo] by steve_ HOST
Dec 12, 2008 (2:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chikoo (Dec 12, 2008 2:29 pm)

I think the US has long had tighter diesel emissions standards than the EU (especially California), but the EU has about caught up. Not sure about gas engines.
 
Here's one link, but maybe someone has one that's easier to decipher.
#1534 of 3958
Re: Looking back, looking forward [chikoo] by cooterbfd
Dec 12, 2008 (2:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chikoo (Dec 12, 2008 2:29 pm)

No, it's both. That's another reason diesels are more popular over there.
 
Which brings me to another question. If the Volt uses a "generator" to recharge the batteries that power the electric motors that actually DRIVE the car, then does the engine in the Volt have to meet US motor vehicle emissions standards, or standards for an auxilliary generator engine, which would be much less strict, if they even exist.
#1535 of 3958
Re: A point of clarification..... [bpizzuti] by kdhspyder
Dec 12, 2008 (2:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Dec 12, 2008 12:46 pm)

In addition while the D3 apologists always trot out their whipping boy, CAFE, as the major reason why they are failing they also always fail to mention that the old outdated CAFE standards exclude the most profitable vehicles in the lineups, the monster SUVs.
 
And as you say when comparing equal vehicles on a level playing field such as small autos or midsized autos the D3 as a group don't compete very well. CAFE or no CAFE.
 
Now legacy costs are a different story and those do make the D3 less competitive. But they brought those costs on themselves by being weak negotiators vs the UAW,
#1536 of 3958
#1499 of 1535 Mute Poit - C11 Prepack Time! (circlew) by hpmctorque
Dec 12, 2008 (3:35 pm)
Reply
You'll probably think I need a checkup from the neck up for saying this, but I, ummm, kind of like that yellow Aztek shown in message #1499. To qualify what I mean by "like" here, I think it's interesting, in a similar way that, say, a Pacer is interesting. Now, I'd only express that view about the more recent Azteks, without the side cladding, because those with the cladding look absolutely hideous.
#1537 of 3958
Re: Looking back, looking forward [cooterbfd] by tlong
Dec 12, 2008 (3:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Dec 12, 2008 1:45 pm)

The problem is that they don't meet US emission and safety standards. That is the main hangup w/ the Chevy Beat.
 
If you were going to invest billions in designing a new car, why wouldn't you add the relatively small amount to make it available in as many markets as possible?
 
Like Fit, Yaris, Versa, for example.

Messages Page 154 of 396
1
...
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
...
396
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement