Sign In Join 



Do You Favor A Government Loan To The Detroit 3?

3958 messages,  Last post on Oct 02, 2009 at 4:52 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Legislation


Messages Page 135 of 396
1
...
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
...
396
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1339 of 3958
Re: Bridge Loan to Nowhere [wevk] by gagrice
Dec 07, 2008 (6:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: wevk (Dec 07, 2008 6:05 am)

The car makers' request for a bridge loan, by contrast, looks like a $34 billion bridge to nowhere. It has already morphed into an opportunity for political extortion -- and we don't even have a bill yet. When, in a couple years, costs have not come down as expected because of political pressure to keep the unions happy and the green cars aren't selling -- because they were designed in Washington, not for consumers -- the companies will be back for more money.
 
You got your "Greens" in DC just drooling over the opportunity to own a car maker they can mold into an alternative transportation company. Cost is not even considered by this bunch. They will try to force US all into a Yugo that is powered by the Sun with peddles to assist on the long up hill roads.
 
Fortunately we have a Congress that rarely agrees on anything, but when it is lunch time. The buildings at GM will be all rusted out before they can come up with a bailout plan. We will give them a few billion so everyone gets a nice Christmas. Then it will be on the shoulders of the new team to get the job done. I would be looking for a new job if I worked for GM or Chrysler.
 
The UAW workers at Ford may survive if they back off on blocking progress. For those that did not see it. This IS progress, and it could have been built in the USA, but for the UAW.
 
http://info.detnews.com/video/index.cfm?id=1189
#1340 of 3958
Too big to fail by sergelbergeron
Dec 07, 2008 (8:24 am)
Reply
When the big guys become so BIG and it can kill the economy to let them fail, then they are too big. Today companies (Banks, manufacturers) are just plain too big. This Bigness does not bring a better life for the people. There is a point where bigger and bigger deos not provide any real benefit. Not to the shareholders maybe only the CEO's - then when there is trouble the people need to bail them out, wth our tax dollars. The globalization at any costs is not working. As Michael Moore was saying on Larry King Live - we need to bail them out but the people will need to tell the big three what kind of vehicles they will be doing.
 
I say we need to bail them out but then make sure it never happens again.
#1341 of 3958
Re: What the government should do [berri] by kernick
Dec 07, 2008 (9:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: berri (Dec 06, 2008 1:43 pm)

Wagoner seems to have been slow on the button, but in all fairness he inherited a lot of this mess.
 
So I guess you never expect much out of a new president and Congress right? for they have the whole country to change and only 4 years? And Wagoner has had a single corporation and 14 years.
#1342 of 3958
Being shown the door? by pf_flyer HOST
Dec 08, 2008 (4:34 am)
Reply
Is Wagoner being told This Way Out?
#1343 of 3958
Re: non Big-3 already sorta subsidized [kdhspyder] by grbeck
Dec 08, 2008 (7:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Dec 06, 2008 3:25 pm)

kdhspyder: Mulally confirmed yesterday exactly what you said. He said that the D3 since the middle of the last century were of the opinion that 'If we build it they will buy it'. This credo permeated everything they did from crappy cars to bad service to over production to not having a view of the risks in the futre ( Prius, unbelievable fuel prices, death of SUVs ). That's why the three of them were there in front of Congress begging forgiveness for their sins....and for a little bite to eat and a warm cot to sleep on.
 
Ironic that the one who arguably had nothing to do with this mess is the one who can clearly see the problem...another reason why I believe that Ford will be the last man standing.
#1344 of 3958
Big 3 looking for a miracle by gagrice
Dec 08, 2008 (7:58 am)
Reply
SUVs at altar, Detroit church prays for a bailout
 
DETROIT, Dec 7 (Reuters) - With sport-utility vehicles at the altar and auto workers in the pews, one of Detroit's largest churches on Sunday offered up prayers for Congress to bail out the struggling auto industry.
 
"We have never seen as midnight an hour as we face this week," the Rev. Charles Ellis told several thousand congregants at a rousing service at Detroit's Greater Grace Temple. "This week, lives are hanging above an abyss of uncertainty as both houses of Congress decide whether to extend a helping hand."
 
Local car dealerships donated three hybrid SUVs to be displayed during the service, one from each of the Big Three. A Ford Escape, Chevy Tahoe from GM and a Chrysler Aspen were parked just in front of the choir and behind the pulpit.
 
Ellis said he and other Detroit ministers would pray and fast until Congress voted on a bailout for Detroit's embattled automakers. He urged his congregation to do the same.
 
Other Detroit-area religious leaders -- including Christian, Muslim and Jewish leaders convened by Cardinal Adam Maida -- have urged Congress to approve an auto aid package.
 
But the service dedicated to saving Motown's signature industry at Greater Grace Temple was the highest profile effort to mobilize support yet.
#1345 of 3958
Anyone for a media bailout too? by kernick
Dec 08, 2008 (7:59 am)
Reply
You'll see in the below the Chicago Tribune is going Ch11. The whole newspaper industry is seeing less advertising $. I'd guess so is every newspaper, and every magazine, and every TV and radio station. Are we going to bail them out too?
 
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Tribune-could-file-bankruptcy-WSJ/story.as- px?guid=%7B71F8BA18%2D2283%2D4844%2D8818%2D6269BB00CF08%7D
 
Or Dow Chemical this morning announced an 11% cut in employment and 20 plants closing. I guess they don't have any lobbyists? Maybe when Dupont and Exxon Mobil cut they can all go for a bailout too?
 
Oh, I can't forget the homebuilders. Let's bail them out too. And I hear income in Vegas is down; we can't let that area which is already suffering large home price decreases to suffer more. How about bailing out all of Nevada?
#1346 of 3958
what's missing here? by nippononly
Dec 08, 2008 (8:14 am)
Reply
Strings attached
Congress could set tough bailout conditions. Here are some possibilities.
•Appoint a "car czar" to oversee automakers' restructuring
•Force companies to file for bankruptcy if they don't meet loan terms
•Require GM and Chrysler to merge
•Cut hourly workers' compensation and scrap the UAW Jobs Bank
•Compel bondholders to accept a debt-for-equity swap
•Prevent companies from lobbying against states' global warming initiatives

 
Nothing about dealer franchises, at least not that I can see. If they force GM and Chrysler to merge, they will have 11 brands and what, 10,000 dealers? How will they rid themselves of the 7000 dealers and 7-8 brands they need to? Will the "car czar" have a hand in that, and the ability to suspend existing laws in this area so that the necessary cuts can be made?
 
http://www.autonews.com/article/20081208/ANA03/812080320/1200
(registration link)
 
PS there is also this: Some lawmakers floated the idea of requiring financial institutions that are getting federal aid from the $700 billion rescue package to make loans to automakers.
 
While that sounds intuitively tempting, I think it would be a bad idea - we only just got done rescuing them from bad debts, now we want to saddle them with new ones?
#1347 of 3958
by dtownfb
Dec 08, 2008 (9:01 am)
Reply
here's an interesting article highlighting an ad that GM is running basically apologizing to the public. It seems like they finally get it. This is the tone they should have had during their first visit to Washington back in November.
 
http://www.autonews.com/article/20081208/ANA02/312089881/1018
 
I'm not an economist nor an expert in the auto industry but the numbers just don't add up for GM. They are $66B in debt; their common stock is worth less than $5B; they have made a profit since 2004 when sales were over 16m; there is no way they will show a profit with current sales and structure; too many dealerships that will require billions to close; etc. I'm in favor of a pre-packaged bankruptcy so we can save some jobs and get GM to profitability.
#1348 of 3958
Saturn may be easier to kill.... by dtownfb
Dec 08, 2008 (9:03 am)
Reply
Here's an article on the Saturn franchises. Supposedly, their franchise agreement is unique and may allow GM to kill this brand fairly inexpensively. Of course it could all in up in court.
 

DETROIT — Saturn's franchise agreement is different from those of General Motors' other brands.
 
The Saturn agreement required dealers to sign the Federal Trade Commission's Franchise Disclosure document, says Mark Johnson, president of financial advisory and brokerage firm MD Johnson near Seattle.
Subscribe to Automotive News
 
"Nobody at any car store since the beginning of time has ever signed one of those except Saturn dealers," Johnson says. "The whole document tells you how you could potentially lose all of your investment through debt and losses through this franchise."
 
Saturn confirms the unique agreement.
 
Saturn spokesman Steve Janisse says, "Everything was done differently with Saturn, and this was one of those things."
 
Janisse says Saturn has a different legal structure from other GM brands. Saturn has a Franchise Operations Team, which has a limited say in brand operations.
 
The FTC document favors the manufacturer, Johnson says, "so GM is in a much better position to terminate Saturn than any other manufacturer with any other brand."
 
In the late 1980s, GM cherry-picked the best dealers for the new dealer network. The dealers have heavily influenced the company.
 
Janisse says GM's seven other brands operate under a Dealer Sales and Service Agreement, a personal service agreement between the dealer and GM. For dealers, Johnson says, the good news is that state franchise laws probably would trump any signed documents in a court of law.

Messages Page 135 of 396
1
...
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
...
396
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement