Article Comments - Mazda 6 vs. Honda Accord vs. Nissan Altima

120 messages, Last post on Feb 27, 2009 at 2:31 PM

You are in the Mazda6 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDA6, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Car Comparisons, Sedan

Finding the Sweet Spot in Family Sedans - After all the poking, prodding, driving and scoring, the $30,690 2009 Mazda 6 s Grand Touring earns a total of 70.3 points in our comparison for a 1st-place finish. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 6 of 13: 1; ...; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; ...; 13; Prev; Next; Last

#48 of 120 Reliability by cx7lover Sep 12, 2008 (5:17 pm)
The powertrain is pretty proven, the CX-9 is still faring very well with no issues to speak of from the engine or transmission. Not a great reason not to buy one. The same transmission in my CX-7 is still faring well after a year of abuse and 40K miles in that year.
#49 of 120 Mazda 6 vs Honda Accord vs Nissan Altima by kong572003 Sep 15, 2008 (11:31 pm)
Yesterday, I took a long test drive in all three cars mentioned... The Mazda 6 and the Altima were more sport sedan oriented than the Honda Accord. They are fun to drive and offer many attractive features for the enthusiast looking for those attributes in a sedan. But when it comes to a family sedan that has pretty fair handling and is quite enjoyable to drive (even for the sport sedan enthusiast), plus, one hell of a lot more comfortable in the front and back seats, let's say, on a long vacation drive with the wife and two kids. It is hard to beat the Honda Accord. Not to mention there is no argument what so ever as to what car has the best reliability record. It is so obvious that the author of the article is a sport's car (not family sedan) enthusiast...If a sports car comparison is what the author wanted to write about, just add a few thousand dollars and change the article to BMW 1 series vs Infinity G35 vs Pontiac G8. The author when comparing the three sedans conveniently left out the comfort ratings of the front and back seats, except to mention the Altima's lack of head space in the back seat. Don't believe Consumer Guide (fall 2008) that rates the comfort levels of both the Altima and the Mazda 6 one to two notches lower than the Accord, front and back respectively. Just sit in all three cars and judge for yourself. Be honest, which car would be more comfortable to drive on a long trip? The Honda Accord hands down! Another misleading (fictional) aspect of the article is the fuel milage rating of all three cars. I don't know what three cars the author was testing, but the authors ratings on the Accord do not hold up to hundreds of happy Honda Accord 2008 owners that have written blogs stating much higher gas milage than 18 mpg overall on their V6's. I guess according to the author's figures, Honda is dishonest with their rating on the Accord's gas milage, shown as19/29. Where as the honest Mazda and Nissan companies tell the truth when they report the Mazda 6 is rated at 17/25 and Nissan rates its V6 Altima at 18/26. As well, make note and use common sense, duh, it's not hard to guess which cars you would be considerably more aggressive on the gas with, the two that are delightfully more fun to push to their limits, yes, the Mazda 6 and Nissan Altima. I used way more gas with those two cars over the Honda just in a test drive...Fun! All three cars are great cars and I'm sure all a joy to own for anyone fortunate enough to purchase one. I guess in the end, the author's article is apporiate for this election year. For the article, as impartial as the author probably thought it was, simply showed his ideology. Replies to this message: bvdj84 (Sep 16, 2008 6:05 am) jeffyscott (Sep 16, 2008 8:02 am) aviboy97 (Sep 16, 2008 6:42 am)
#50 of 120 Re: Mazda 6 vs Honda Accord vs Nissan Altima [kong572003] by bvdj84 Sep 16, 2008 (6:05 am)
Replying to: kong572003 (Sep 15, 2008 11:31 pm) See, if I didn't find the altima down right ugly. I feel it looks like a slug, dragging its big rear end around. I am serious. The rear is huge, heavy! Nothing special about dragging that thing around. I don't get a sporty vibe from it. The interior is just middle of the line. The Altima coupe is very nice though, But, I have never really been interested in nissan all that much, only because of the design. Its okay, its just me though. My take on it. You know what though, I have not driven it though, so I can judge there, perhaps it does drive nice, but I have no desire to. Now the new mazda6 looks amazing, design is certainly not boring like the nissan, very classy. I think they are going to do really well with this. I have not driven this car yet, but plan to. Not that the Accord has out there type of looks either, but it certainly holds it style and finish well. Great interior, great engine, its a honda. IHonda, I love Honda. Design of the sedan could use more looks the Accord coupe has or more outgoing design, and it would not have hurt any sales, and many would applaud them for doing so, but it could cut into Acura line. Replies to this message: jeffyscott (Sep 16, 2008 8:02 am)
#51 of 120 Re: Mazda 6 vs Honda Accord vs Nissan Altima [kong572003] by aviboy97 Sep 16, 2008 (6:42 am)
Replying to: kong572003 (Sep 15, 2008 11:31 pm) Okay, we should not believe Consumer Guide when it comes to reviews, but rather believe you, obviously a Honda bias fanboy, in regards to comfort? Common, you cannot say that! The whole "Don't believe them, believe me!!" attitude just does not work. Now, if you respectfully disagree with their comfort ratings, and you think the Accord is more comfortable that is fine. Just don't accuse reviews of being wrong, and your opinion of being right. I also noticed you mentioned the observed FE of the Accord as being inaccurate. The fact is, when you want to use all the Accords power it uses gas. The Accord is engineered to cruise and get better fuel economy, not to utilize all 268 ponies (271 for 09) and still get an average of 25mpg. Bottom line, as Edmunds stated, when using all that power, down goes the fuel economy. Mazda engineers their engines to USE the power they have, hence why the observed FE was in line with the EPA estimates. BTW, it's the EPA that tests the engines, not the mfgr. I have read about the many people you mention who are happy with their FE in the Accord V6, however, you conveniently left out the hundreds of unsatisfied Accord VCM owners as well. You want to talk about a fair and balanced review by Edmunds, how about a fair and balanced post by you in regards to the Accord owners? Bottom line is all three are good cars. It is obvious the Mazda and Nissan are geared more towards performance and the Accord is geared more towards the "family vacation cruiser". We all know that. What matters is what works best for you. If it's the Accord, that's fine. The Accord is a really good car, as is the Altima and Mazda6. I'm not trying to bash you here, just be aware that everyone has different opinions and feelings towards these cars. All in all, we are all enthusiasts.
#52 of 120 Re: Mazda 6 vs Honda Accord vs Nissan Altima [bvdj84] by jeffyscott Sep 16, 2008 (8:02 am)
Replying to: bvdj84 (Sep 16, 2008 6:05 am) See, if I didn't find the altima down right ugly. I feel it looks like a slug, dragging its big rear end around. I am serious. The rear is huge, heavy! I feel exactly the same way about the Altima's looks. The new version made it even worse...now when I see the prior one, I think it's not so bad. I was relieved (in that I would not feel a need to give it any consideration) that I found the seat very uncomfortable when I drove one. Mainly drove it because I was intrigued by the CVT.
#53 of 120 Re: Will adding the $4,200 Premium package turn the tables? [cx7lover] by maxamillion1 Sep 16, 2008 (1:32 pm)
Replying to: cx7lover (Sep 11, 2008 12:50 am) Try again my friend....I never said anywhere that the Camry does not compete with the 6...words in my mouth much? What I did say was that your comparison of saying the Mazda6 Grand Touring would compete with the Altima 3.5SL would be like saying the 6 GT competes mostly with the Camry XLE...which makes little sense. All I am saying is that for comparative purposes the Camry SE and Altima SE are better competition for the Mazda6 Touring and GT than Camry XLE or Altima SL models would be...whatever you got out of the rest of it is own you. You can bring up “standard equipment” …but that’s a moot point when Camry SE and Altima SE models can be equipped with as many if not more features than the Camry XLE and Altima SL. Also, Who mentioned anything about "gaudy body kits" something Mazda was known for with the previous generation Mazda6? If anything that “gaudy” body kit on the Camry was inspired by the previous Mazda6! I think its reasonable to believe that the Camry, Altima, Sonata, Fusion, Malibu and others compete with the Mazda6..they are after all, Midsize sedans We disagree though when you state the Altima 3.5SL is a better competitor to the Mazda6 s GT because of standard features...when an Altima 3.5SE is a better competitor against the GT. And for the record, the Mazda6 SHOULD be better in a lot of aspects compared to the Altima and even the Accord since it is the newest sedan on the block and considering that Mazda considered Nissan as the benchmark for most of its testing. It’s better in a LOT of aspects, and it’s worse in some too…and those aspects for which we discuss could be subjective (styling for example, interior design for example)...so who knows. I never said the Mazda6 wasn't the better car...but its not WORLDS better either. As far as styling...I see a LOT of similarities in styling between the Altima and the Mazda6...take a look at this picture and tell me what you guys and gals think? To the naked eye I don't think folks would really notice much of a difference. Of course the devil is in the details....but I think most consumers will think the cars look very similar to each other, the 6 just looks more 'finished' Replies to this message: aviboy97 (Sep 16, 2008 1:39 pm) maxamillion1 (Sep 16, 2008 2:05 pm) aviboy97 (Sep 17, 2008 5:27 am) cx7lover (Sep 28, 2008 10:11 pm) and 3 more...
#54 of 120 Re: Will adding the $4,200 Premium package turn the tables? [maxamillion1] by aviboy97 Sep 16, 2008 (1:39 pm)
Replying to: maxamillion1 (Sep 16, 2008 1:32 pm) " I guarantee if a comparison test is done with these cars you'll most likely see the Mazda6 GT compared with the Accord EX-L (which is beginning to be strech within itself)" Why would you say that? Are you saying that the Mazda6 s GT cannot compete with the Accord EX-L?? "Who mentioned anything about "gaudy body kits" something Mazda themselves were known for with the previous generation Mazda6 in its earliest years?" I know I'm late to the conversation, however, I would hardly call the 03-05 Mazda6 Sport "gaudy". The Sport package still continues to be the most liked among Mazda6 enthusiasts, not to mention classy. If you are not referring to them as gaudy, I apologize. Replies to this message: maxamillion1 (Sep 16, 2008 2:05 pm) aviboy97 (Sep 17, 2008 5:27 am) cx7lover (Sep 28, 2008 10:11 pm) maxamillion1 (Sep 29, 2008 6:15 pm) thegraduate (Oct 13, 2008 6:19 am) and 1 more...
#55 of 120 Re: Will adding the $4,200 Premium package turn the tables? [aviboy97] by maxamillion1 Sep 16, 2008 (2:05 pm)
Replying to: aviboy97 (Sep 16, 2008 1:39 pm) Well in that the Accord is becoming more Camry-like with each redesign, it's becoming more and more sedate with each redesign as well. They definitely compete with each other as they both are midsize sedans...but the Accord is becoming increasingly more sedate. It's not the tossable, fun to drive sedan that it once was. More fun than a Camry or Sonata (non SE) yes? As fun as a Mazda6 or Altima? Not quite. As far as the comments about "gaudy body" kits...look back at CX7's comments...he's the one that called the Camry SE's body kit gaudy. I simply stated that calling the Camry's SE's body kit "gaudy" is like calling the Mazda6's from 03-05 "gaudy" since the Camry SE's styling was inspired by the Mazda6. Further as I mentioned styling is subjective...Some may find the body kit for the Camry or the Mazda6 from those years "gaudy" others may not Replies to this message: aviboy97 (Sep 17, 2008 5:27 am) cx7lover (Sep 28, 2008 10:11 pm) maxamillion1 (Sep 29, 2008 6:15 pm) thegraduate (Oct 13, 2008 6:19 am) elroy5 (Oct 13, 2008 2:08 pm)
#56 of 120 Re: Will adding the $4,200 Premium package turn the tables? [maxamillion1] by aviboy97 Sep 17, 2008 (5:27 am)
Replying to: maxamillion1 (Sep 16, 2008 2:05 pm) Gotcha I, for one, happen to like the Camry SE's styling quite a bit! The non SE trim, without the sporty body kit looks like it's missing something. I guess since I like my 05 Mazda6's styling so much, it would make sense that I like the Camry SE. It's OBVIOUS Toyota bench marked the Mazda6 when looking for the new Camry design.
#57 of 120 by ribbonspeakers Sep 17, 2008 (3:39 pm)
But when it comes to a family sedan that has pretty fair handling and is quite enjoyable to drive (even for the sport sedan enthusiast), plus, one hell of a lot more comfortable in the front and back seats, let's say, on a long vacation drive with the wife and two kids. I wonder how many miles the average family spends shopping, commuting, etc. vs. miles spent on vacations. Not to mention there is no argument what so ever as to what car has the best reliability record. CU Reliability Ratings: Accord/Camry tie 4-cyl; Accord best 6-cyl It is so obvious that the author of the article is a sport's car (not family sedan) enthusiast...If a sports car comparison is what the author wanted to write about, just add a few thousand dollars and change the article to BMW 1 series vs Infinity G35 vs Pontiac G8. No, it's not obvious. A sports car enthusiast can competently judge family cars as well as sports cars as long as they are familiar w/ the different uses & priorities. OTH, a sedate family car fan w/ mediocre driving skill at speed may lack driving skills required at speed. The compared cars are all family sedans regardless whether you agree or not. The Bimmer might be labeled a sports car but is more accurately labeled a sport coupe; G35 & G8 are sport sedans. The author when comparing the three sedans conveniently left out the comfort ratings of the front and back seats, except to mention the Altima's lack of head space in the back seat. Don't believe Consumer Guide (fall 2008) that rates the comfort levels of both the Altima and the Mazda 6 one to two notches lower than the Accord, front and back respectively. Just sit in all three cars and judge for yourself. Be honest, which car would be more comfortable to drive on a long trip? The Honda Accord hands down! It's a contradiction to direct readers to decide themselves then immediately after that you decide for them. The more comfortable might be one of the vehicles the less useful it is for you to pre-answer the question. Another misleading (fictional) aspect of the article is the fuel milage rating of all three cars. I don't know what three cars the author was testing, but the authors ratings on the Accord do not hold up to hundreds of happy Honda Accord 2008 owners that have written blogs stating much higher gas milage than 18 mpg overall on their V6's. You need more evidence of false reports beyond your mere words to claim "fiction". Stating you don't "know what three cars the author was testing" means you either are illiterate or the article author can not identify the cars. What reason could cause the author to not know a car's identity other than incompetance or dishonesty? Your language is very strange & your motives highly suspect. Who are the hundreds of anonymous blogs posters you mention? Honda employees? I guess according to the author's figures, Honda is dishonest with their rating on the Accord's gas milage, shown as19/29. Your guess is incompetent. The author never implied or stated dishonesty. More suspect motives on your part. ...companies tell the truth when they report the Mazda 6 is rated at 17/25 and Nissan rates its V6 Altima at 18/26. As well, make note and use common sense, duh, it's not hard to guess which cars you would be considerably more aggressive on the gas with, the two that are delightfully more fun to push to their limits, yes, the Mazda 6 and Nissan Altima. I used way more gas with those two cars over the Honda just in a test drive. EPA specified tests don't discriminate, are linear across the board for all manufactureres. They are what they are & those that dislike the results can cry all they want about the results. You seem paranoid. Unless you measured the fuel consumption of each of the three cars your last sentence above is baseless. What is "way more gas"? Twice? 3x? 50%? It's ridiculous anyway because your three test drives were not scientific. Did winds change? Traffic? Your driving technique? Type of gas? ...I guess in the end, the author's article is apporiate for this election year. For the article, as impartial as the author probably thought it was, simply showed his ideology. An attempt to compare this innocuous car comparison to political ideology is ridiculous, w/ all due respect. The author is far more nuetral than you. He has/had no financial or emotional interest in any one vehicle. He was paid to compare cars. Your objectivity is minimized by purchasing the one car you champion in your post.