You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Mazda6
Article Comments - Mazda 6 vs. Honda Accord vs. Nissan Altima

120 messages, Last post on Feb 27, 2009 at 2:31 PM
You are in the Mazda6 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
Finding the Sweet Spot in Family Sedans - After all the poking, prodding, driving and scoring, the $30,690 2009 Mazda 6 s Grand Touring earns a total of 70.3 points in our comparison for a 1st-place finish. (more)
|
Replying to: maxamillion1 (Sep 09, 2008 1:49 am)
|
|
|
|
|
I never thought I'd see the phrase "Namibia's largest online showroom of cars." Then again, I wasn't looking for it. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ribbonspeakers (Sep 08, 2008 2:09 pm) Since Lexus = Toyota, to me this would mean the new Mazda6 is like a Camry. I'm not saying it is...just pointing out that not everyone wants a car that is "like a Lexus". Though many certainly do, which is why 400,000+ Camrys are sold each year in the US. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: cx7lover (Sep 09, 2008 3:15 am) The 3.5SE can be had with EVERY option that is available on the 3.5SL which would in essense make it better eqiupped than the Mazda6 Touring you talk about and more in line with the Grand Touring since the SL that you claim competes with the 6 GT would have fewer features than said loaded 3.5SE. The premium pkgs neats the following options: dual zone automatic climate control, full leather upholstery, rear a/c vents, BOSE Am/Fm/CD6/XM with 8 speakers, metallic trim, heated front seats, leather shift knob, power lumbar support, xenon auto on/off headlamps, auto dimming rearview mirror, and everything else that comes standard on the 3.5SL. There is no denying that the 6 is the better equipped car and there is no denying that the Altima is too expensive for what you get.But to say that the 3.5SE only competes with the Mazda6 Touring because it has less standard features (but optional features that would make it better equippped and MORE expensive than the 3.5SL) is saying too that the 3.5SL is a better competitor with the Touring model when in the end the 3.5SE can be had with more "comparable" features to the Touring or Grand Touring than the 3.5SL model could. Both the 3.5SE and 3.5SL models come up real short on features compared to the any Mazda6 Grand Touring, but the 3.5SL's smallish 16 inch wheels, more luxurious ride and cushier handling would fail against any Mazda6 model. The 3.5SE would at least stand a chance. Afterall this comparison test was done to prove which sedan was the sportiest, which sedan was the best..no doubt the 3.5SL would have lost more points in handling than a 3.5SE would have. The Altima's gauges nearly blinded you? Maybe you should have tried adjusting them
|
|
Too bad only Japan makes mid size sedans today. I wish Chevrolet, Ford, VW, etc made something worthy of including in a comparison test. Oh yeah, they do.
|
|
|
Replying to: usa1 (Sep 09, 2008 8:20 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Sep 09, 2008 9:14 am) You answered your own question.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: m6user (Sep 09, 2008 9:20 am) http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpcontainers/do/vdp/articleId=123842/pageNumber=5 |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Mazda6
Article Comments - Mazda 6 vs. Honda Accord vs. Nissan Altima
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA6
2010 Honda Accord
2010 Nissan Altima



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats