Sign In Join 



What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car?

1503 messages,  Last post on Nov 14, 2009 at 1:11 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Car Buying, Biodiesel, Diesel, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, SUV


Messages Page 88 of 151
1
...
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
...
151
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#867 of 1503
Re: Another eco friendly choice for the EU [gagrice] by ruking1
Jan 24, 2009 (12:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jan 24, 2009 12:18 pm)

My post was more of a systems comment rather than individual. So for example if the system was serious about REAL savings (which we have already proved they really are not: the corollary being they are SERIOUS about TALKING about savings) at the point they allowed say diesel (SUV's) Sequoia into the system they would project how long it would take for a higher percentage % fleet of engines that burnt less rather than more.
 
As an alreadly known entity, the fleet of (gasser) SUV's took app 35 years to go from less than 2% of the fleet to 12% of the fleet.... Lights, camera, sound, action!!!
 
As an aside, 2% of the passenger vehicle fleet is diesel. Of that % and number, 2%, upwards of 93% are diesel "so called" light trucks. History shows beyond a shadow of a doubt, the policy has been and probably continues to be one of higher consumption.
#868 of 1503
Re: Another eco friendly choice for the EU [ruking1] by gagrice
Jan 24, 2009 (1:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Jan 24, 2009 12:34 pm)

I agree with you wholeheartedly. What is crazy is Ahnold and his band of merry men wanting to force the auto makers into lower GHG emissions. All the while opposing the obvious route to lower emissions and save on fossil fuel. And as Steve has pointed out the push to EV will only make things worse. It will bring the price of transportation down on a per mile basis. Require more and better roads. Cut tax revenues for infrastructure and the added electricity has to come from somewhere. Can't charge your car at night with solar cells. MORE COAL... which we have an abundance of.
#869 of 1503
by jkugler
Jan 24, 2009 (5:02 pm)
Reply
A new set of tools! never liked diesels never will, they stink, literally! Unless your towing, plowing, or any other heavy duty work, no thanks! All my diagnostic tools are for gasoline engines, and I don't see many passenger cars still on the road that tried to go diesel. (vw, nissan)
#870 of 1503
Re: [jkugler] by bigmclargehuge
Jan 25, 2009 (6:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jkugler (Jan 24, 2009 5:02 pm)

You have an archaic and obsolete view of diesels. Really not applicable to the new offerings.
#871 of 1503
What "special" tools are needed? by bpeebles
Jan 25, 2009 (7:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jkugler (Jan 24, 2009 5:02 pm)

If you think you need some kind of special tools to diagnose a diesel problem, perhaps you need to learn more about diesels. My main "diagnostic tool" is laptop computer which connects to OBDII connector under dash of ALL vehicles sold in USA this decade.
 
Lets compare Gasoline and Diesel engines for a moment...
Oil pressure -- SAME
Air in... exhaust out -- SAME
Cooling system -- SAME
Power steering (some are electric) -- SAME
AirConditioning -- SAME
ABS brakes -- SAME
Intake/Exhaust Valves -- SAME
Crankshaft -- SAME
CamShaft --SAME
 
ThrottleValve -- NONE ON DIESEL
IgnitionSystem -- NONE ON DIESEL
 
Gee - it looks as if diesel has LESS stuff on it than gasoline engine.... This is another reason Diesel is more reliable.
 
PS: The lack of throttleValve on Diesel engine is main reason it gets better MPG.... Unlike a gasoline engine which constantly sucking a vacuum against the throttle valve, a diesel engine is allowed to freely breathe as much air as it wants. (This is also why when you let off the throttle of a Diesel, the car barely slows down... no throttleValve to cause a vacuum)
#872 of 1503
Re: Another eco friendly choice for the EU [ruking1] by lilengineerboy
Jan 26, 2009 (4:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Jan 24, 2009 9:19 am)

Bigger vehicles will always do better with innovative drivetrians.
"Available in two- or four-wheel drive, Tahoe Hybrid provides the power and capability you expect from a Chevy utility vehicle while offering fuel efficiency you never imagined — an outstanding EPA estimated MPG 21 city, 22 highway for 2WD models and 20 city, 20 highway for 4x4 models.
 
In fact, 2008 Tahoe Hybrid 2WD offers the same city fuel efficiency as a four-cylinder Toyota Camry."
 
"Tahoe Hybrid optimizes efficiency and performance whether you're driving in the city or on the highway thanks to the two-mode hybrid propulsion system. It's this innovative system that allows Tahoe Hybrid to offer up to 50% better city fuel economy the non-hybrid Tahoe."
#873 of 1503
Re: Another eco friendly choice for the EU [lilengineerboy] by gagrice
Jan 26, 2009 (5:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: lilengineerboy (Jan 26, 2009 4:30 am)

Tahoe Hybrid to offer up to 50% better city fuel economy the non-hybrid Tahoe."
 
While the Tahoe hybrid may offer a slight improvement over the non hybrid. It is in no way worth the higher price. GM could have had a real hit by putting a 6 cylinder diesel into the Tahoe class SUV. They could have easily made 25 MPG highway and not neutered the vehicle for towing. I got as high as 22 MPG on the highway with my old GMC hybrid PU truck. No thanks to the hybrid. In town it was the same old 15-16 MPG as all the other trucks I have owned. The Tahoe with 5.3L V8 gets 20 MPG on the highway and will tow 2500 lbs more than the hybrid. So that is only a 10% improvement over the non hybrid Tahoe. I think that all the Domestics and most of the Asians have missed the mark on large SUV power. They need to look at the German offerings to see where true economy resides. Within the next few months, VW and Audi will join BMW and Mercedes with 6 cylinder diesels that will blow the socks off anything offered in the USA. The BMW X5 diesel does the 0-60 MPH in 6.5 seconds. Try keeping up with any of the gas guzzling GM Hybrid SUVs. Then knock out 26-30 MPG on the highway.
#874 of 1503
by larsb
Jan 26, 2009 (7:08 am)
Reply
Americans Owe Five Months of Their Lives to Cleaner Air
 
Let's not hammer the guvmint for wanting clean diesels. It helps us to live longer.
 
Are you a city dweller? The cleaner air of this "going green" era may actually be increasing your lifespan. A new study by researchers at Brigham Young University and Harvard School of Public Health shows that average life expectancy in 51 U.S. cities increased nearly three years over recent decades, and approximately five months of that increase came thanks to cleaner air.
 
"Such a significant increase in life expectancy attributable to reducing air pollution is remarkable," said C. Arden Pope III, a BYU epidemiologist and lead author on the study in the Jan. 22 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.
 
"We find that we're getting a substantial return on our investments in improving our air quality. Not only are we getting cleaner air that improves our environment, but it is improving our public health."
 
The research matched two sets of data from 51 cities across the nation: changes in air pollution between about 1980 and about 2000; and residents' life expectancies during those years. The scientists applied advanced statistical models to account for other factors that could affect average life spans, such as changes in population, income, education, migration, demographics and cigarette smoking.
 
In cities that had previously been the most polluted and cleaned up the most, the cleaner air added approximately 10 months to the average resident's life. On average, Americans were living 2.72 years longer at the end of the two-decade study period; up to five months, or 15 percent, of that increase came because of reduced air pollution.
#875 of 1503
Re: [larsb] by gagrice
Jan 26, 2009 (7:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jan 26, 2009 7:08 am)

Let's not hammer the guvmint for wanting clean diesels. It helps us to live longer.
 
And that makes the same guvmint social programs less sustainable. We are living too long in retirement as it is. Not sure what that all has to do with wanting a clean diesel that saves fossil fuel for future generations. Life is a compromise.
#876 of 1503
"diesel will never be green" by steve_ HOST
Jan 27, 2009 (3:37 am)
Reply
Dynas, "GM and the Diesel-Like Gasoline Engine" #21, 27 Jan 2009 12:50 am

Messages Page 88 of 151
1
...
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
...
151
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement