Sign In Join 



What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car?

1503 messages,  Last post on Nov 14, 2009 at 1:11 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Car Buying, Biodiesel, Diesel, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, SUV


Messages Page 78 of 151
1
...
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
...
151
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#763 of 1503
in the latest issue by nippononly
Jan 06, 2009 (7:43 am)
Reply
C&D has a comparo of 4 hybrid midsize sedans, including the new Fusion which did outstandingly. In it they have a half-page comparison between hybrid and diesel, and their conclusion is that at the time they wrote the article, hybrid was the clear winner because the price of diesel was (and still is today) so much higher than regular unleaded.
 
While people are writing articles like that, diesel passenger cars will have a hard time getting off the ground I think.
#764 of 1503
Re: maybe [gregg_vw] by ruking1
Jan 06, 2009 (7:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: gregg_vw (Jan 06, 2009 6:09 am)

..."All my TDI acquaintances who have chipped report even better mileage on long trips. BTW, have already upgraded my clutch. "...
 
If it were me, I'd do the injectors upgrade first, then the chip. I believe the Rocket Chip guy that does the traveling local GTG's, and the "custom" tuning is really the ticket Charlie (Kerma)!! also does the circuit and I have met both of them at a few GTG's. If not, both offer quick turn Fed Ex type services, so your car is down the minimum amount of time.
#765 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [alltorque] by steve_ HOST
Jan 06, 2009 (8:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: alltorque (Jan 06, 2009 3:02 am)

What's the price differential between diesel and petrol running these days in your world?
 
Still about a buck difference between RUG and diesel here in Boise.
#766 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [bpeebles] by altair4
Jan 06, 2009 (8:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: bpeebles (Jan 05, 2009 5:02 pm)

You wrote:
Your append saddens me... you are a host here on edmunds yet you do not seem to understand the economics of COST PER MILE.
  
You need to IGNORE the cost per gallon... it is nearly irrelivant.
  
I have a spreadsheet tracking every drop of fuel run thru my 2003 TDI. The overall fuel cost per mile is $0.05 Again, this is OVERALL cost from day1 of ownership over 100,000 miles.... not just a spike or best. (The best is $0.03)

 
You are correct; it's all about cost per mile, not cost per gallon.
 
I have almost 60K on my '03 Passat. I run only the recommended premium fuel through it and have kept track of all of my expenses as well:
 
Since 11/2002 through today, fuel is costing me $0.111 per mile, with my personal best being $0.058 per mile. Worst was $0.19 per mile, when gas reached $4.10 per gallon with a heavy city bias.
 
Maintenance, for the same date range, is at $0.065 per mile, excluding oil changes. Tires are killing my average, being on my fourth set. Tires account for $0.028 per mile.
 
Oil changes, all done within the 5,000 mile recommended OCI, is at $0.011.
 
Overall, my car costs $0.186 per mile.
 
I wished I could recreate my entire spreadsheet with diesel pricing. But looking at my most recent gas purchase - I drove 296.1 miles at 21.22 MPG, rendering a per mile cost of $0.092. Using the EPA posted urban mileage for the TDI Jetta of 29 MPG and the pump cost of $2.699 per gallon, then the cost would have been $0.093, or a bit more than the PUG cost. If one would use the AMCI urban value of 38 MPG that VWoA touts, then the cost would have been $0.071 per mile. At my 10,000 miles a year, that's anual savings of $220 (keeping a whole lot of assumptions in place!). I keep a car ten years, so $2,200.
 
I still keep coming around to the idea of buying a diesel Jetta wagon to replace my wife's Accord. She, on the other hand, is more interested in an Oddy minivan. What I love to see is a minivan with a TDI engine. VWoA, you are missing your niche! Give me a minivan that gets my current mileage of 21 city and 32 highway, and you'll have me signing up.
#767 of 1503
Re: maybe [gregg_vw] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jan 06, 2009 (9:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: gregg_vw (Jan 06, 2009 6:09 am)

I'm not following you here, sorry.
 
A chip can't increase power and mileage across the board at the same time. When the dyno shows the HP above stock, the fuel/air analyzer will show the mileage below stock.
 
You can for instance get a remarkable 26 mpg on a new Corvette, but you will be pussy-footing in 6th gear at 1800 rpm. The HP of the Corvette is IN THERE all right, but you will pay for it in fuel consumption.
 
Some chips are great, some are bogus, but none defy the laws of physics that I'm aware of.
 
RE: The "odd duck" 335D.
 
You are talking about Europe. That's whole different ball game for a diesel passenger car. They have lower diesel prices vs. gas prices, they have a long tradition of diesel passenger car use, and they LIKE diesel cars.
 
None of the above apply to the USA (as of yet).
 
RE: Passat --- gas Passats have good resale, too. The TDI is a great little car but really, the reason the resale is high is because of supply vs. demand, not because it's a diesel per se.
 
There aren't that many out there, and there are just a few more buyers than sellers apparently.
 
This is not the same as thinking that if you increased the supply dramatically, you'd get a dramatic increase in diesel buyers. All you'd do is satisfy those few who still want them but can't find 'em right now.
 
I think we're all beating the same dead horse. Diesel cars are not going to make a dent in the US market until a) their price goes down b) their quality goes up and c) diesel fuel prices drop.
 
Europe as already achieved these things. They have great little affordable diesel hatches and they can save a lot of money using diesel fuel (except maybe in parts of UK, etc.--or so I'm told).
#768 of 1503
Re: maybe [Mr_Shiftright] by gregg_vw
Jan 06, 2009 (10:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 06, 2009 9:26 am)

I see you are not following, but I am not talking defying any laws of physics. The TDIs are capable of both better mileage and power than the way the are shipped here (and this is proven by the VW factory choices available in Europe that cannot be bought here for a lot of complicated reasons). Another way to look at it (and using gassers as an example): the Ford Ecoboost gets better mileage than the non-ecoboost-lesser hp V6 on which it is based. This is just fact. It is true in many cases that the the next size up engine actually gets better mileage than the lower hp base V6 engine (some years of the Ford Ranger this occurred).
 
In any event, talk to those who have gotten RocketChipped before you assert your royal "a chip cannot increase mileage and hp at the same time." Of course it can, but it doesn't have to. Depends on the application, how well matched to the vehicle and how that vehicle is driven. I already know that if I chip my car and then drive mostly with a heavy foot, my mileage will suffer. For me, the extra hp and torque would only be there for those odd occasions where a little more oomph would be useful. In the meantime, where diesels do best mileage-wise (as well as Corvettes in sixth gear) is where I will see an actual mpg increase: steady highway speeds.
 
You make some very good points about Americans, diesels and price v. availability. TDI prices ARE high because there aren't that many takers in the scheme of things--and those of us who are takers have to take what we get (and that includes both higher initial cost and much higher resale). But you also throw in the kitchen sink with blanket statements about chips. TDI guys are a very dedicated lot and much has been learned through the regional meets, trial and error, blogging, sharing, keeping logs. It may not interest you and that's fine, but before you say you know better about chips than those who manufacture and use them, at least take a look at the data.
#769 of 1503
Let me step in and help you by larsb
Jan 06, 2009 (10:29 am)
Reply
I think you two are just on the tip of converging. Allow me to push.
 
This statement is true:
 
"A chip cannot increase mileage and hp at the EXACT same time"
 
Meaning, you will not get higher gas mileage from a chipped car when the throttle is wide open than you will with a non-chipped car WHEN THE THROTTLE IS WIDE OPEN.
 
This statement is also true:
 
"A chip can increase mileage in one moment and hp at another moment"
 
Meaning, a chipped car will have more power at WOT AND CAN ALSO provide higher mileage under normal operating circumstances and speeds.
 
Is that a good summary?
#770 of 1503
Re: Let me step in and help you [larsb] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jan 06, 2009 (10:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jan 06, 2009 10:29 am)

Perfect. Thank you for putting that out there better than I could.
 
What I was saying is that no chip in the world could allow my car to make me go faster 0-60 all day long and yet record a higher average gas mileage at the end of a month.
 
The chip is merely manipulating what is possible in the engine. The chip is not "creating" more power out of thin air, and in giving better fuel mileage, is working outside of manufacturer's specs for reliability or drivability.
 
I find the notion that a chip is "outsmarting" factory engineers to be unfounded. The chip maker and the factory engineer have different goals and the chipped car is not a "better" car necessarily.
 
It just changes the compromises is all.
 
 You want to run leaner mixtures, or higher turbo boost, or longer shift points...okay fine, as long as you accept the compromises.
 
Besides, often these chips require other mods which are not unsubstantial.
#771 of 1503
Re: Let me step in and help you [Mr_Shiftright] by gregg_vw
Jan 06, 2009 (11:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 06, 2009 10:39 am)

Well, mr. smartiepants, you were sure splitting hairs on this one, and for what end? If you already knew what larsb said so well, why did you feel the need to go on about laws of physics and such? Talking down to people for no good reason just pisses people off. I don't think there is anyone on this particular forum who would actually think you could increase both hp and mpg at the exact same moment with a CPU reflash. I also don't think any of the posters here are unaware that chipping (or manufacturer's specs for that matter) is a compromise. As I said before, you have made some good points re: diesels, but you lose points with this unnecessary nitpicking (and implicit assumptions about how uninformed some posters are).
#772 of 1503
Re: Let me step in and help you [gregg_vw] by steve_ HOST
Jan 06, 2009 (11:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: gregg_vw (Jan 06, 2009 11:03 am)

It seems to me that most of the performance chip ads all focus on "Improved Performance And Mileage." So someone is ignoring physics, like the sellers of them. A few ad examples from a quickie net search:
 
"Chipping a car is an easy way to make more horsepower and get better fuel mileage reliably. "
 
"Extracts Every Energy Possible From Fuel Molecules, Increases Miles-Per-Gallon At Part Throttle And Horsepower At Wide-Open Throttle"

Messages Page 78 of 151
1
...
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
...
151
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement