Sign In Join 



What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car?

1503 messages,  Last post on Nov 14, 2009 at 1:11 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Car Buying, Biodiesel, Diesel, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, SUV


Messages Page 76 of 151
1
...
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
...
151
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#751 of 1503
Re: with gas [nippononly] by steve_ HOST
Jan 05, 2009 (7:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Jan 05, 2009 7:32 pm)

Well, if $1.66 is the baseline, then my Subaru is around 6 cents a gallon. I just track miles and gallons, not price, so the real number over the last 5 years is closer to .10 cents a mile. I get about 21mpg combined mpg on it, which would run closer to .08 cents, but it comes out better on my spreadsheet.
 
Don't bet the farm on my math skills though.
#753 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [gagrice] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jan 05, 2009 (7:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jan 05, 2009 7:21 pm)

I'd say the only downside to buying a 335D is the depreciation you'll probably suffer if you want out in a couple of years. With an X5, this might not be a factor. A diesel BMW sedan is an odd duck, to say the least.
#754 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [gagrice] by plekto
Jan 05, 2009 (9:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jan 05, 2009 7:21 pm)

Here is my real world complaints about all the 4 banger gas cars I have seen and ridden in. They cannot keep up on the SoCA Interstate highways without down shifting and screaming up to over 4000 RPM. They are few and far between that can get 500 mile range on a tank of gas. Most of the V6 & V8 gas engines are not much better.
****
 
Well, that's exactly the problem with gasoline engines. To develop maximum HP, they need to scream, as maximum torque isn't produced until you're approaching red line. JUst the nature of the beast.
 
Diesels, OTOH, have loads more torque so they can get away with lower RPMs and shift a lot less often. Torque is huge in passing times and roll-on acceleration as well.
 
BTW, Fifth Gear(U.K. auto show) recently tested several cars and the closest they could get, even flogging the cars hard, was still 20% slower than the listed 0-60 times! They couldn't even get the Ariel Atom under 4 seconds, despite slamming the clutch hard and wringing the hell out of it.
 
The Corvette, for instance, is designed to withstand 100 full throttle 0-60 launches before the engine and transmission break. Most cars are closer to half that many. Nobody sane drives like that except for auto testers and people doing drag racing. So 0-60 times are often twice as fast as listed in actual traffic.
 
This is another advantage to torque over horsepower. Since the cars all don't GO 0-60 in under 10-15 seconds in actual traffic, smoothness, lack of shifting, and the feeling of how hard the engine pulls you along matter far more. Of course, I'm kind of preaching to the choir here. Heh. Modern diesels completely destroy gasoline powered designs of most vehicles other than the top-end cars - mostly extreme sport sedans and exotics and the like, which are kind moot in actual real life driving. (ie - Porsche is great, but you hit 65mph in 2nd or 3rd gear and then your fun is over)
#755 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [plekto] by steve_ HOST
Jan 05, 2009 (9:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Jan 05, 2009 9:35 pm)

I think this is a common red herring but it's not a "problem" for an engine designed to run at higher rpms to do so. It may be a problem for you as a driver but it's not a design issue. Otherwise Honda would have folded decades ago.
 
It would be nice to see more emphasis placed on torque instead of 0 to 60 in the car reviews.
#756 of 1503
Re: with gas [nippononly] by ruking1
Jan 05, 2009 (10:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Jan 05, 2009 7:32 pm)

iI you are all excited about YOUR Echo, I would imagine you'd be beside yourself in a TDI ECHO !!! You would not have to make an apples to oranges comparison with a Jetta.
#757 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [Mr_Shiftright] by ruking1
Jan 05, 2009 (10:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 05, 2009 7:58 pm)

Actually this angle interests me. Most of it will be projection for app 1 year to 3 years. It will be interesting to see if the BMW 335 D will be worth more than the BMW 335 I.
 
The Jetta TDI has exceeded any of my projections and expectations. I know that Jetta's (gassers) and for sure BMW gassers drop like boulders in the depreciation department. The TDI for much of its early life could sell for more than I paid. The so called premium the time if I remember correctly was app 246. However in the Jetta's case (according to Edmunds.com)the TDI 6 years old is worth a min of 3,300 more than a like model/mileage/condition 1.8T.
#758 of 1503
Re: with gas [ruking1] by nippononly
Jan 05, 2009 (10:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Jan 05, 2009 10:11 pm)

Exactly! Why won't they do it? The proposed Clubman diesel, which actually DOES come in a diesel trim across the pond, is the closest thing I have heard yet.
#759 of 1503
Re: with gas [nippononly] by ruking1
Jan 05, 2009 (10:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Jan 05, 2009 10:33 pm)

This would be easy for you to do an apples to apples comparison. So for example given the same RATIOs on like models : VW jetta is 29 mpg (gasser)is to (49 mpg D2), as your Echo (gasser) 41.5 mpg is to X mpg for a turbo diesel Echo.
#760 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [Mr_Shiftright] by alltorque
Jan 06, 2009 (3:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 05, 2009 7:58 pm)

A diesel BMW sedan is an odd duck, to say the least.
 
Over here, in Europe, the diesel versions of BMW saloons, (sedans), are the preferred options. real-world performance is much the same; particularly mid-range acceleration, (and they'll more than keep up with any traffic flows), fuel economy is better, the drive is less frenetic, (higher torque will pull longer gear ratios for fewer changes), and resale values hold up far better, (even outweighing the slightly higher new premium). The M3 and M5 gassers are, of course, still purchased for their outright performance and "showoffability". (as are the Audi RS4's and RS6's).
 
Situation is much the same with other marques also, where there are comparable gasser and diesel versions available. Indeed, the factors given above put me into the driving seat of a Volvo S60 D5 rather than its T5 stable mate. Volvo has obviously now recognised this and the current S60 is only available with 2.0T/178bhp/177lbft gasser or 2.4D/163bhp/251lbft or D5/185bhp/295lbft diesels. The biggest sellers in the Volvo XC90, Audi Q7 and even the BMW 6-series and Audi A6's and A8's are the diesel variants, (from my observations, at least). There again, Europe has had diesels for a long time, together with ULSD and high fuel prices, (i.e. tax loading).
 
In the real world a diesel saloon is far from being an odd duck, whatever the marque...................but if you can't try 'em & buy 'em they must seem like an odd concept.

Messages Page 76 of 151
1
...
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
...
151
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement