Sign In Join 



What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car?

1503 messages,  Last post on Nov 14, 2009 at 1:11 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Car Buying, Biodiesel, Diesel, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, SUV


Messages Page 72 of 151
1
...
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
...
151
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#706 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [Mr_Shiftright] by ruking1
Jan 03, 2009 (12:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 03, 2009 10:36 am)

Actually when you go back into the history the "evolution" of both the diesel and the WASTE (RUG to PUG ) products makes a lot of sense. Diesel from barrels of oil has been and remains the "money" products. If you (EPA) dispose of either product; that action (epa approved disposal) inexorably drives up the cost of the remaining product. So it makes all the sense to have a balanced population of both RUG to PUG and so called oil burners (min of 23%) . It makes no sense in the pantheon of how the foreign oil dependency conundrum is framed to:
 
1. continue to EXPORT D2, while charging the RUG to PUG users .50 to $1.00 per gal to do so.
 
2. continue to import 60% foreign barrels of oil to meet an artifically created a min of 23% spike in RUG to PUG.
 
2. artificially limit passenger diesel D2 to less than 1% when the natural product mix from a barrel of oil is (EIA.GOV data) 46% RUG to PUG and D2 23.4. %
 
4.. The problem is structurally not solvable, (cut foreign importation of barrels of oil) if we continue down the path we have chosen.
#707 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [Mr_Shiftright] by yankabilly
Jan 04, 2009 (11:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 03, 2009 10:36 am)

Did you know that a bio company in Cal. has made a diesel fuel that burns 90% cleaner then reg. diesel and it does not JELL. But they are being force to make the factory in BRAZIL not in the UNITED STATES. WHY?
 
The auto manufactors could make a 3-4 cylinder for cars that get 45mph to put in cars but they dont what to that other 10% can be put through a hepper filter just like on one of the Mercades cross overs. They are in the back pockets of the oil company. Just like Ford with the tire problem, they new the tires had a problem and did nothing about it untill they got caught.
#708 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [yankabilly] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jan 04, 2009 (11:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: yankabilly (Jan 04, 2009 11:15 am)

I don't think that the automakers and the oil companies are in cahoots about anything.
 
Let's face it---American do not, nor have they ever, liked small cheap diesel cars. They barely tolerate diesel Benzes.
 
Detroit doesn't build them because no one will buy them. That's been proven time and time again, at least to me. They are too expensive to build (not just the engines but meeting the emissions regs) and the market is too small to justify the capital costs.
 
My opinion is that even if gas hit $10 a gallon, you will not get 99.5% of American car buyers into a diesel Daewoo with cardboard door panels and cloth seats, even if it got 75 mpg. You would get a few more into diesel Passats, but it would be a fractional market share gain, IMO.
#709 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [Mr_Shiftright] by ruking1
Jan 04, 2009 (11:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 04, 2009 11:25 am)

For my two cents, I am totally ok with Detroit so called " NOT" building diesels. What is totally disengenuous is the BIGGIE THREE lobbying to NOT allowing world wide diesels into the USA market !!! (even as they will concede they DO build world wide diesels) Indeed if you look I bet some diesels are "built" in the USA for (world wide) EXPORT !!!!
 
I have read in passing VW will build a plant in Tenn which will build diesels models for the world wide markets including the "US " market.
 
Given the recent bru ha ha, the big three and UAW did NOT testify in securing the permanent taxpayer bail out monies, what will take the place of pick up trucks and suv's !!! So that should be a fairly obvious signal they will continue to build them. Making them in turbo diesel to increase the mpg and torque, etc. is probably far too logical a leap.
#710 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [Mr_Shiftright] by yankabilly
Jan 04, 2009 (11:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 04, 2009 11:25 am)

The Ford flex would be the Idle car to put into. I work for ford so I can tell you witch one to put it in.
 
Every year ford send out a flyer on ideas and every year putting diesel in cars is always #1 but it never happens.
 
Just like putting the alison trans. in the super duty. The motor is turned down so not to brake trans. Putting the allison 6speed and put a splitter so you can increase mpg would be the best thing. People around here do that after the warrenty runs out and put the chip in it
#711 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [yankabilly] by ruking1
Jan 04, 2009 (11:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: yankabilly (Jan 04, 2009 11:49 am)

And there you have it!
#712 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [ruking1] by yankabilly
Jan 04, 2009 (12:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Jan 04, 2009 11:44 am)

I was stationed in Germany in the eighties and 90% of the vehicles were diesel and driving at over 100 mph in a 325i and still getting 45mpg back then. So you tell me why they did not bring deisel motors to the U.S.
#713 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [yankabilly] by ruking1
Jan 04, 2009 (12:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: yankabilly (Jan 04, 2009 12:06 pm)

..."and driving at over 100 mph in a 325i and still getting 45mpg back then. So you tell me why they did not bring deisel motors to the U.S. "...
 
The 2003 VW Jetta TDI can easily do that and still deliver 48 mpg. On a recent 3 state and 45 min CN border stop and go trip (965 miles one way) I ran a steady 75 mph with bursts to 80 mph and it returned 59 mpg. So in comparison to a Jetta gasser which would struggle to get 29 mpg, the diesel for logical purposes is an absolute no brainer. It is such a no brainer than when even close friends ask me what I get in a diesel, I don't even say anymore. If they press, I just say well it could be better.
#714 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [yankabilly] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jan 04, 2009 (4:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: yankabilly (Jan 04, 2009 12:06 pm)

the simplest answer is always the best.
 
Americans don't like diesel cars and won't buy them.
 
That's why the Big Three will not built them for domestic market, at least not the domestic market *as it is now configured*.
 
If one does not agree that the government *punish* people until they do buy diesels, then you have to let the market dictate what is built by what is bought.
 
You could not currently give away at 1/2 price a $35000 Chevrolet diesel sedan.
 
You could not get an American driver into a Peugeot turbo diesel hatchback or a VW Rabbit diesel.
 
You CAN (and have) gotten them into diesel pickups for hauling gravel, etc.
#715 of 1503
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [Mr_Shiftright] by ruking1
Jan 04, 2009 (4:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 04, 2009 4:20 pm)

Your post does not acknowledge the lack of choice. So it is 1. a circular argument 2. self fulfilling prophesy.
 
So for example while we get a pretty good 38-42 mph on a(gasser) Honda Civic for a commute, I would buy a turbo diesel Civc that got 56 mpg !!! The unacknowledged problem is it is simply not available on the US market.

Messages Page 72 of 151
1
...
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
...
151
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement