- #688 of 1503
-
Re: in the news [jlbl]
by Mr_Shiftright HOST
-
Dec 18, 2008 (11:59 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: jlbl (Dec 18, 2008 11:42 am)
it's tricky to calculate projected high speeds only by mathematics. The engine may not be able to pull the highest gear to the maximum RPM, due to aero effects, etc.
As you increase speed, the HP you need increases exponentially, not linearly.
|
- #689 of 1503
-
Re: in the news [Mr_Shiftright]
by ruking1
-
Dec 18, 2008 (12:01 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 18, 2008 11:59 am)
Indeed your assertion is probably true. I suspect for Jose this is true also, but I will not put words in his mouth, but he (as well as I) are just reporting the reality rather than projecting.
|
- #690 of 1503
-
Re: in the news [Mr_Shiftright]
by jlbl
-
Dec 18, 2008 (12:48 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 18, 2008 11:59 am)
Yesterday I came back home after driving with my wife 1,000 miles to and fro. In the end, highway average speed was 73 mph as a result to try cruising at 86 mph (2,200 rpm), with occasional peaks up to 100 mph to rock the engine. All in cold wether, ranging from -3ºC to 6ºC. Averaged consume (tank filled twice) was 33.5 miles per gallon.
That, as rucking1 has said, was reporting from reality.
1750 rpm = 68 mph
2000 rpm = 78 mph
2250 rpm = 87 mph
2500 rpm = 97 mph
3000 rpm = 117 mph
4000 rpm = 155.34 mph
Those were products of multiplying rpm by respective gear multiplication factors. Yet most of them have been assessed by myself (only up to 3000 rpm ). In that, I merrily acknowledge my wife collaboration as a co-pilot; she wrote down the figures I simultaneously read on the speedometer and the 'cuentarrevoluciones' of my 335d. I can be very obsessed when checking the performance of my cars.
As you increase speed, the HP you need increases exponentially, not lineally.
I may be wrong, but I believe that when increasing speed the fuel burned to get the necessary HP and the HP itself is what increases not lineally. I was speaking of revs., not of HP or fuel necessary to obtain the speed/revs.
Regards,
Jose
|
- #691 of 1503
-
Re: in the news [Mr_Shiftright]
by kcram HOST
-
Dec 18, 2008 (9:56 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 18, 2008 11:59 am)
Kinda why I love my Cummins Ram. My hp peak is just 2900 rpm (325 hp), so it's still making an insane 589 lb-ft at that rpm. (Torque peak is 610 lb-ft at 1500, so there's very little fall-off through the whole rev range.) In-gear redline is 3200, and I can hit it in every gear, including overdrive.
kcram - Pickups Host
|
- #692 of 1503
-
poor exchange
by steve_ HOST
-
Dec 24, 2008 (1:01 pm)
-
|
Subaru UK puts the brakes on Impreza diesel importation
|
- #693 of 1503
-
Re: poor exchange [steve_]
by ruking1
-
Dec 24, 2008 (1:11 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Dec 24, 2008 1:01 pm)
Good time to make a deal on Subaru diesels !!! This of course is a HUGE advantage for Euro oems, i.e.,: VW.
|
- #694 of 1503
-
Apropos of nothing in particular
by bumpy
-
Jan 02, 2009 (3:07 pm)
-
|
|
This little buggy is fully US-legal as of yesterday.
|
- #695 of 1503
-
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [bumpy]
by ruking1
-
Jan 02, 2009 (3:11 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: bumpy (Jan 02, 2009 3:07 pm)
Love that front fence !!!
|
- #696 of 1503
-
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [bumpy]
by gagrice
-
Jan 02, 2009 (3:45 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: bumpy (Jan 02, 2009 3:07 pm)
I have given them and the Land Rover diesels a thought. Once they are 20 years old they can be brought in legally. Strange laws we have.
|
- #697 of 1503
-
Re: Apropos of nothing in particular [ruking1]
by Mr_Shiftright HOST
-
Jan 02, 2009 (5:33 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: ruking1 (Jan 02, 2009 3:11 pm)
GEEZ -- we don't need a law to ban diesels, we need a law against push bars like that. I mean, if they can put crash bars on the back of trucks to protect us from being decapitated, how about sawing off the corral fence from the front of SUVs?
|