- #1463 of 1503
-
Re: What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car? [british_rover]
by sellaturcica
-
Oct 24, 2009 (5:06 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: british_rover (Oct 22, 2009 9:15 am)
What a fail on VW's part.
|
- #1464 of 1503
-
Re: What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car? [british_rover]
by gagrice
-
Oct 24, 2009 (6:40 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: british_rover (Oct 22, 2009 9:15 am)
The VW Tiguan TDI with the 2.0L engine rated at 140 HP is being sold in the UK. It is available in the 4motion with automatic. Rated at 47.9 MPG highway which is right at 40 MPG US.
I really have no problem driving my gas guzzler Sequoia as long as the EPA has their head up you know where. For those of US that would like to use less fossil fuel, we are constantly blocked by the Federal Government.
Tiguan TDI 4motion
|
- #1465 of 1503
-
Re: What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car? [gagrice]
by rcarr7
-
Oct 24, 2009 (6:56 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Oct 24, 2009 6:40 pm)
I think the passenger vehicle fleet percentages tell the "real" Fed.Gov policy story. However as such, or even as powerful as those numbers indicate, it is only a "mirror," so to speak.
In 2009 with literally multiple decades of atempted "attitude" adjustment, good mpg cars (usually compact and even most mpg figures are.... poor ) are only less than 25% of the passenger vehicle fleet.
The other 75% of the passenger fleet are cars that get so called LESS mpg !! Even with the current 27 mpg so called "standards," the real or defacto figures are between 18-22 mpg, if lucky, (aka WILDLY optimistic) . With SUV's being 12% of the population, folks who buy them are REALLY only complying with the Fed.Gov's (REAL) policy. The overwhelming majority of the fleet are gasoline. This is so even when diesel is acknowledged to be anywhere from 20-40% better ! Indeed it would be a very easy case to make, that the recent domestic auto industry debacle was due to folks NOT following the Fed.Gov policy !!!! (aka NOT buying LESS mpg vehicles like... SUV's !!
I am sure you would agree, but it is difficult to buy more diesels when MORE diesels are not on the market.
What does your SUV get.... 18 mpg ? Would you have bought a diesel Sequoia if it got 20-40 % better mph? (21.6 to 25.2) Probably the most germane question would be it was an available DIESEL option? Seems to have worked with the Jetta diesel. The IRS even gave the Jetta TDI a tax credit of $1,300!
|
- #1466 of 1503
-
Re: What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car? [rcarr7]
by gagrice
-
Oct 25, 2009 (4:35 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: rcarr7 (Oct 24, 2009 6:56 pm)
I did average 18 MPG on a long vacation trip. Most of the time the Sequoia only gets 14.5 MPG. Plus I am stuck using CA crap gas. When I bought the Sequoia there was only one diesel SUV available in CA new. The VW Touareg TDI with the fire breathing V10 diesel. Not known for great mileage. Just great HP and Torque. Now there are at least 4 diesel SUVs from the 3 German companies. Again they are overkill with V6 diesels all topping 400 ft lbs of torque. The deal killer for me is that Mickey Mouse urea injection. Again it was only implemented in the US to satisfy CARB. So if the Sequoia was available with the same D-4D power train used in the Land Cruiser I would have jumped on it. In the UK diesel is all you can get in the large SUVs from Toyota. That tells me that Toyota is capable of building a diesel engine that is clean enough for EU emission standards. Which the EU says are better than the USA.
|
- #1467 of 1503
-
Re: What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car? [gagrice]
by gagrice
-
Oct 25, 2009 (4:57 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Oct 25, 2009 4:35 am)
As a comparison. If the Sequoia was powered by the Land Cruiser D-4D engine, my mileage would have been around 35 MPG US, according to UK estimates of 42 MPG. Even with the slightly higher cost of diesel across the USA, I would have saved about $350 in fuel costs. Plus another $56 for the extra oil change every 5000 miles. Just the extra oil changes required with gas engines waste millions of barrels of oil each year.
It all adds up to an EPA that is controlled by the oil companies. Gasoline started out as a waste product of the refining process and continues to this day. So why not get the masses to use it?
|
- #1468 of 1503
-
Re: What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car? [gagrice]
by rcarr7
-
Oct 25, 2009 (6:31 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Oct 25, 2009 4:57 am)
For illustrative purposes, let's say 14.5 to 18 mpg vs the TLC's D2 system of 35 mpg. Pardon me for being non PC, but the mpg percentage gain over 14.5 mpg is HUGE 142% !!?? 18 mpg, 35 mpg is a 94% gain.
Again, what part of MASSIVE won't diesel deny 'ers acknowledge / understand? If I may also mention, the 35 mpg (almost) meets the small car definition of the new upcoming 2012 standards of 35.5 mpg !!
|
- #1469 of 1503
-
Re: What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car? [rcarr7]
by gagrice
-
Oct 25, 2009 (7:34 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: rcarr7 (Oct 25, 2009 6:31 am)
As you can see. The only way to achieve the new CAFE standards with a decent sized SUV is to use a diesel engine. The Hybrids from GM are pathetic. I don't call 21 MPG a decent improvement. I remember getting 20 MPG on the road a couple times with my 1998 Suburban. I got 19.8 MPG on one long drive with the Sequoia.
|
- #1470 of 1503
-
Re: What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car? [gagrice]
by rcarr7
-
Oct 25, 2009 (7:59 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Oct 25, 2009 7:34 am)
Judging by what has and is happening in the domestic oems' department, (Ford,Chrysler, GM) it appears to be an almost no brainer, the Fed.gov (now that it and the unions are substantial oem owners/controllers) will only continue to "wordsmith" the big three mainstays mpg for: pick up trucks, suv's, etc. Those that do NOT see the irony here, probably truly believe that foxes can guard the hen houses, and... well. That is even with the upcoming 2012, 35.5 mpg standards. While you point out that a TLC can get (yesterday and off the shelf) 35 mpg, they would be loathed to let it into the country. Why? Because it ACTUALLY gets... 35 mpg !!??
The Jetta's 03 VW TDI vs the 09 VW TDI is a demonstration in "regulatory" speak. As vilified as TDI's were WAY back in 2003 ( ) Both are/were/continue to be... 50 state legal. The 03 (EPA 42/49) gets a range of 44 to 62 mpg and during a point a to b commute gets 48-52 mpg. . The 09 (EPA 29-30/40) gets a (SHORTER) range of 39-47 mpg and during the same point a to b commute gets 39-47 mpg. Either obviously exceeds the "old/current standard" of 27 mpg and the 2012, 35.5 mpg. ( both of course can be hypermiled to achieve... more)
While slow to take hold www.edmunds.com does show 39 vehicles with the diesel option.
|
- #1471 of 1503
-
Re: What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car? [gagrice]
by nippononly
-
Oct 25, 2009 (8:45 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Oct 25, 2009 4:57 am)
Of course, if your Sequoia had that European diesel under the hood, it would have European acceleration - say, 25 seconds or so to 60 mph? Which is not a strike against it in my book, but I imagine it might have caused you a second thought or two, no?
Eventually, diesels or no, hybrids or no, one of the greatest and cheapest gains in fuel economy we can achieve will be by slowing down these cars and trucks. Nobody needs to hit 60 mph in 7 seconds in a 5000-pound SUV like Gary's Sequoia. Nor do they in the average family sedan.
|
- #1472 of 1503
-
Would I buy one?
by lucien2
-
Oct 26, 2009 (4:46 am)
-
|
|
I've driven several diesels in Europe, including a 2007 Passat and a 2006 Renault Espace. Both were fantastic. Punchy, torquey, and with enormous range (and delicious 6 speed manuals). I'd be very happy with either car here in the States.....but I do need a wagon. So far, VW seems the only company willing to oblige, and for some reason there is not one TDi Jetta Sportwagen for sale in the state of MD we could even test drive.
|