Sign In Join 



What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car?

1503 messages,  Last post on Nov 14, 2009 at 1:11 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Car Buying, Biodiesel, Diesel, Hybrid Cars, Coupe, Hatchback, SUV


Messages Page 125 of 151
1
...
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
...
151
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1238 of 1503
Re: meanwhile, back on the ranch [ruking1] by bigmclargehuge
May 06, 2009 (11:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (May 06, 2009 11:29 am)

The "European versions" DO in fact share that SAME engine !!!!!
 
I'm sure they do, I was referring to what should have been done in the US.
 
For example, the 5-series sportswagen.
 
I think BMW should further explore this attraction of sportswagen owners to diesels.
#1239 of 1503
Re: meanwhile, back on the ranch [bigmclargehuge] by ruking1
May 06, 2009 (11:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: bigmclargehuge (May 06, 2009 11:33 am)

Actually BMW is having "issues" selling the 2009 335 D. When I test drove several, 3 months ago, they literally had ZERO to one in stock. They were taking "orders" at MSRP+. Since that time they have instituted a 3k discount. So if you are going to do a 5 series Sportwagen, then why not sedans, etc, etc. I have read in passing they want to maintain the profit levels they have grown accustomed, volume is far down the priority list. If sales seem to be good, me thinks they will go back to MSRP +. If sales are not so good, MSRP to leasing them.
#1240 of 1503
Re: meanwhile, back on the ranch [ruking1] by bigmclargehuge
May 06, 2009 (12:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (May 06, 2009 11:43 am)

You said:
 
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.f1a9dde/1211
 
And I disagree that the US is 'uninterested' in diesel engines as a whole.
 
My opinion is that a more premium, utilitarian car would attract more diesel buyers than a 'so-called entry-level' sport sedan.
 
For starters, the 5-series is more premium than the 3-series. Secondly, the Sportwagon is more utilitarian.
 
The 335d is not the same vehicle at all. I'm not sure why you would say: So if you are going to do a 5 series Sportwagen, then why not sedans, etc, etc.
 
But the engine seems to work fine in an X5d. So by extension, perhaps a 535Dxdrive Wagon would be the next logical step. Not a RWD sports sedan.
 
I loved the 335d engine when I drove it. I just felt it was in the wrong car.
#1241 of 1503
Re: meanwhile, back on the ranch [bigmclargehuge] by ruking1
May 06, 2009 (12:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bigmclargehuge (May 06, 2009 12:06 pm)

Well, let me put it this way, you are more than welcomed to disagree with msg 1212's swag,
 
I am NOT affiliated in any way with BMW, but was swagging about BMW IN the US. Evidently as I said then and say now, BMW does NOT think it worth the risk/reward to do as you think, otherwise... why would they NOT !!??
 
In addition since you appear to be a current BMW owner, 405 # ft of torque presents a HUGE marketing problem to BMW; as the "ENTRY" level 3 series now DRAWF's the whole line (gassers), except for the most exotic or massively tuned models.It is also STARKLY apparent the gassers are guzzlers in comparison. Again I think you probably follow it closer than I. So give us a heads up.
 
Me, I would disagree it (the 335 D engine is in the wrong car !! I absolutely loved it !! Evidently even current BMW owners think it WAY overpriced, as when I was trying to get on any of three order lists, NO one was before me. Truly I hope it has picked up since then.
#1242 of 1503
Re: meanwhile, back on the ranch [ruking1] by gagrice
May 06, 2009 (12:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (May 06, 2009 12:21 pm)

I think that BMW offered the X5 as their utility offering. And the fact it is assembled here made it a good choice for the diesel. It had way more power than I need, from my short jaunt out on the freeway. It literally made my Sequoia V8 feel sluggish when I got back in and took off. That engine would be a killer in an F150. I also like the 5 series wagon. The 3 series just seemed small to me. So the 335D was not of any interest. I have to go and drive the Touareg V6 diesel soon. It is about $12k cheaper than the X5 and I like the looks better. The Touareg is only 4" shorter than the X5. And has a 4 foot smaller turning circle.
 
The Urea injection still has me upset. I wonder if you get low out in the desert if you can just pee into the canister and be on your way? I think the BMW inline 6 is a better design than the VW and MB V6.
#1243 of 1503
A letter to Ford by jkinzel
May 06, 2009 (12:55 pm)
Reply
This is a letter I wrote to Ford and mailed 5/5/09. It is in regards to an article in Edmunds that is included. This is maybe my 5th letter on diesels to Ford and GM
We (you and me) need to write letters to the auto makers. They need to hear this or they will continue with the SameOldSh**
Its time consuming and it takes thought, but letters are what count.
 
Dear Sir,
This is the single biggest mistake you can make. I was shocked when I read this. Ford has a chance to beat all the others and they quit. I have no idea what you are thinking or who you are listening to, but there is a diesel market that is starving for high mileage diesel powered light duty trucks and passenger cars.
I just traded my 1993 Ford Explorer for 2005 VW diesel Beetle and we love it. Two different cars, yes. Diesel cost more than gas, yes, BUT, my wife loves the fuel and money savings, the sound, feel and power of the diesel engine and wishes our Taurus had a diesel, something like in the Ford Mondeo in Europe.
In July of 2008 we purchased a new 2008 Taurus Limited and we love the car, but I wonder all the time how much nicer it would be with a diesel engine in it.
As stated above, my wife loves the diesel as do I. An assumption on my part is the both GM and Ford assume that diesel is a “guy” thing and that is so wrong. There are a lot of ladies that own VW diesels by choice.
Regards,
 
Ford Holding Off on Light-Duty Diesel for F-150
It's been in the works for years and now it's on hold - again. We referring to the smaller, light-duty diesel engine planned for the Ford F-150. It was scheduled to go on sale in 2010, but according to a report in Automotive News it's now on indefinite hold.
Adding a high-mileage, high-torque diesel to its most popular truck seemed like a sure thing a year ago. Now that gas prices have come down, however, diesel is far less attractive from a cost standpoint.
According to article, the program has been delayed until 2013 but if gas prices remain low compared to diesel fuel the engine could be scrapped altogether. General Motors recently delayed development of its own light-duty diesel in an effort to conserve cash.
#1244 of 1503
Re: meanwhile, back on the ranch [ruking1] by bigmclargehuge
May 06, 2009 (12:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (May 06, 2009 12:21 pm)

And you're more than welcome to disagree with my request to no one in particular that BMW bring over a 535Dxdrive sportwagon. Mine was just as much of a swag.
 
American 3-series buyers are still a bit of a niche market, IMO. It is viewed as a sports car first, and a sedan second.
 
They are just too tough a nut to crack. Any other class, I think BMW would have an easier time.
#1245 of 1503
Re: meanwhile, back on the ranch [bigmclargehuge] by ruking1
May 06, 2009 (2:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bigmclargehuge (May 06, 2009 12:59 pm)

..."Any other class, I think BMW would have an easier time. "...
 
As both you and Gagrice have delineated, I would be inclined to agree.. I (my 02 cents) think it is great to have one engine common to two cars, but as you have also said, BMW buyers are a niche market.
 
I SERIOUSLY like the 335 D !! It truly is made for long distance road travel. As for the diesel in SUV platforms, an absolute no brainer.
#1246 of 1503
Re: meanwhile, back on the ranch [ruking1] by gagrice
May 06, 2009 (3:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (May 06, 2009 2:27 pm)

After feeling the acceleration out on the highway in a 5200 lb SUV, it is hard to imagine just how fast the much lighter 335D must feel. The 335d is 1400 lbs lighter than the X5. It should have no trouble getting 35+ MPG on the highway. What would it get with the 2.0L 4 cylinder is my question. I guess we are destined to be offered only rockets to satisfy the gas tax people forever. No automaker but VW has the persistence to bring a high mileage 4 cylinder diesel to the American market. By some odd coincidence they are one of the few still making money in this recession.
#1247 of 1503
Re: meanwhile, back on the ranch [bigmclargehuge] by plekto
May 06, 2009 (10:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bigmclargehuge (May 06, 2009 11:19 am)

A 3.0L diesel is all that is needed for a 1/2 ton PU. A 2.5L 4 cylinder for the Ranger/Tacoma sized. Leave the heavy hauling to the 3/4 ton and bigger PU trucks.
 

Then clearly, someone (I'm looking at you Ford ) needs to borrow the BMW I-6 diesel for a light pickup.

 
Except they already sell a diesel Ranger to most of the rest of the world. Already have it, zero r&d required - just change some headlights and other minor bits the same as Mercedes and BMW and VW do with their vehicles.

Messages Page 125 of 151
1
...
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
...
151
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement