Last post on Oct 01, 2013 at 8:58 AM
You are in the Mazda CX-7
What is this discussion about?
Mazda CX-7, SUV
#25 of 68 Re: Need Your Help [bigmick1]
Oct 12, 2009 (3:19 pm)
Whew... I missed a few posts lately.
1) Switch to over-ride the AWD and have it on command. Nissan has that as well a several others. But, it only works up to 15 mph for a long list of reasons. Without the clutches modulating the power to the rear, you'll burn up the system. If you know a way to add such a switch to a CX-7... you must be some extreme tech geek and I am not worthy!
3) Turning off the A/C compressor on command??? Sorry, I'll file that under "silly mods for bored people". There's a button on the dash for that
2) Most of the tire issues are just cheap OEM tires... my son-in-law worked for Goodyear. They definitely make "cheap" versions of their tires for the mfrs. to use. And, the mfrs. use the smooth and gripping tires for giving the car excellent off-the-lot ride/handling. Look at the Treadware rating on OEMs... you'll see numbers in the 200 range. Then, look at something like a Goodyear Assurance... over 400!!
3) The propeller shaft (tail-shaft) replacement is a well-known fix for some units and some degree of vibration. If yours is returning, then one of two things... either they replaced with another bad one or you have the "real problem" with the CX-7 AWD system. And, there is no known cure... only lots of proof that it is real.
4) On the issue of "should I get a 2010 CX-7?". MAN! I have just taken delivery on a 2010 GT with FRONT wheel drive. This car ROCKS in a ton of ways my 2008 did not. They made hundreds of small changes that, in my opinion, "finished" the car they started. With 2,000 miles on it, I love it!!
That being said, note that I did NOT get AWD. Mazda could not assure me that they would make any changes and, if they did, it wouldn't be until the 2011/12 model range.
Frankly, I'm going to have see written/public proof that Mazda redesigned their system or scraped it for a known reliable system from a 3rd party. Frankly, they couldn't fix it on a 2008... I have VERY low confidence they can fix their internally designed one ever
#26 of 68 Re: Need Your Help [maavalous]
Oct 12, 2009 (4:50 pm)
1. A couple of points.
a. Engaging the rear drive full-time is not a problem if you drop one of the front halfshafts. ...CX-7 = RWD
b. Having the rear drive fully engaged along with front drive is not a problem when driving on consistently slippery, low traction, surfaces.
c. Having both front and rear drives engaged once underway, >20MPH, can be HAZARDOUS, as is ALWAYS the case for FWD. With both front and rear drivelines engaged simultaneously you increase the danger of plowing/understearing significantly, and ABS will basically be non-functional, as would be VSC, stability control.
d. I guess I do quality as a "tech geek" as I would have no problem providing PWM modulation of the ATC.
3 (??) No, that button on the dash does not typically prevent the A/C from operating, often with NO indication of same, in the windshield defrost/demist/defog modes, full or partial. And that's when use of the A/C is most problematic, DANGEROUS.
And I find it much easier to turn the A/C off just once for the entire season rather than check to be sure it isn't enabled (someone/me having inadvertently used the "auto" PB). each time I start the vehicle.
2. No. again. 244HP and "automatic" PART-TIME 4WD adds up, simply, to a LOT of tire scrubbing(tires, weakest "link"). Absent FWD biasing and 244HP, a lot of NEEDLESS tire scrubbing. Put that same 244HP, or even 600HP in a RWD or R/awd vehicle and the manufacturer no longer must protect me from myself.
I'd much rather have a simple 2WD, even FWD, the majority of the time and be able to bring in the opposite driveline selectively, on my own, when the need arises. Not by any means saying the TC utilization of the rear drive capability isn't justified. But that REACTIVE use is unlikely to result in any significant level of driveline stress or tire scrubbing, if any at all.
3. (The second 3). As has already been said the CX-7 uses 4WD pre-emptively, often engages the rear driveline only on the presumption of need. Not only does that result in a lot of needless tire scrubbing, tire scrubbing only on the POTENTIAL of need, but puts a LOT of needless stress throughout the entire driveline. Drive shaft U-joints and front and rear halfshaft CV joints (8 of those..??) come immediately to mind. 50,000 miles before one of those begins the failure process..??
Oh, in my experience the drive shaft U-joints will be much more prone to failure than the CV joints.
I can't help but wonder if detuning/derating of the engine HP/torque in the lower gear ranges might be a better overall solution.
4. "Should I get a 2010 CX-7?" Shamefully the new small I4 is not available with the F/awd system. So if you want/need F/awd the 244HP turbo I4 is "it." $5,000 extra just to get the automatic climate control, the only part of the option package that has appeal for me. NOT..!!
I would normally be reluctant to advise the kind of modifications I might do to make it more safe and functional but I just "stumbled" across something called "the brown wire mod" for the Ford Explorer. Apparenty it is a way to disable the "R/awd" mode. I don't think this category of a modification would be as common for a base RWD such as the Explorer, but here it "was", post #59.
Or Google search"
"brown wire" ford explorer.
#27 of 68 Re: Need Your Help [maavalous]
Oct 12, 2009 (5:09 pm)
A shame, really a shame.
Had you known of the "brown wire mod" YESTERDAY, you could have gone ahead and purchased the F/awd CX-7 without having to wait for Mazda's "improvement."
By the way, the new Venza and 2010 RX350 both use the CX-7's F/awd system virtually exactingly. The only exception I see is the lack of PTO cooling that the CX-7 has already. Obviously that might protend a less functional, or less "used" F/awd system as Ford has done with the Escape once they discovered the short-comings in the base design.
Wonder how easy it will be for Lexus to add the PTO cooling..??
#28 of 68 Re: Need Your Help [wwest]
Oct 20, 2009 (2:44 pm)
Whoa there a minute. I don't have access to all the mfr. specs but I can assure you that the Toyota AWD is NOT the same as the Mazda (Toyata includes Lexus for my purposes).
I did find info, and a video, of a Mazda engineer explaining their "internally designed and highly advanced active torque split system". Don't confuse the similarities between all F/awd systems with being the "same" system. All F/awd use a PTO, tailshaft and some form of rear differential control system. There is no way Toyota could be using the same system without buying it from Mazda and that isn't very likely.
As for having cooling to the PTO... hmmm, I'm a bit surprised Toyota doesn't do it. But, perhaps it's because Mazda couldn't get theirs to keep from overheating? A lot of other F/awd designs do not have cooling as well (BorgWarner for one). All I know on that topic... but, seems like cooled would be better than uncool
#29 of 68 Re: Need Your Help [maavalous]
Oct 21, 2009 (8:36 am)
I subscribe to techinfo.toyota.com and I cannot find any differences between the new Toyota F/awd system vs the one in the Ford Escape. Insofar as I know Ford being the first to introduce this system.
"...buying form Mazda..."
This new F/awd system may well have been developed by one of the transmission company's, independent of a single marque. I note the Porsche has now adopted the very same technique except for it being used for R/awd.
"..Mazda couldn't keep theirs from overheating..."
No, historically it was Ford that couldn't keep the PTO/ATC from overheating. Ford reacted by revising the firmware such that the driveline windup stress was significantly reduced. Apparently Mazda wanted to keep the full F/awd functionality and therefore added the cooling.
It will be interesting to see how functional the Venza F/awd system is vs the RX350. I strongly suspect Lexus will soon either eliminate the PB for manually engaging the rear drive or add PTO cooling. Easier to revise the firmware once they discover that most driver's, even Lexus driver's, haven't a clue as to when to use, of not, the manual mode.
#30 of 68 Mazda CX-7 Noise and Vibration
Jan 23, 2011 (2:33 pm)
#31 of 68 Mazda CX-7 noises
Aug 24, 2007 (12:58 pm)
So i purchased my Mazda CX-7 just under a year ago and about 4 months ago it started to make this very loud ticking, clanking noise (lost for the proper comic sound). this noise comes and goes very quickly only when accelerating. i cant reproduce this noise for the technicians while driving..so i just sit there and look like an idiot with my lips flapping trying to get my point across. the technicians say they will take a look and have come up with no answers. so now im stuck with a car that has an apparent problem but no way to diagnose it.... anyone out there have any of the same issues..or can help... by the way this is one thing that is not tripping the CEL...imagine that!
#32 of 68 Re: Mazda CX-7 noises [zewie1]
Aug 25, 2007 (8:55 am)
Sounds like it could be knocking (detonation)due to either lack of premimum fuel, or it"s possible you have an early build CX-7 that need the ECU reprogramed. We have always used premimum gas but just had our ECU updated. If when you back off the gas the noise goes away, this is the most likely issue.
Aug 25, 2007 (12:05 pm)
If it is gas related, you should be able to demonstrate it to the dealer. I think we need more information to assist you in trying to determine a cause. Ed
#34 of 68 Re: reply [outbackeddy]
Aug 25, 2007 (4:36 pm)
ok so i admit i dont use premium fuel, but splurge for the synthetic. but in fact the noise does go away when i lay off the gas. the technician test drove the car and he wasn't able to recreate the noise. and i tried numerous times to get it to make the noise while another person was in the car and still couldn't make the noise. it as if the car has a mind of its own and only does it when it wants to.. by the way thanks for the help any new ideas.........?