Sign In Join 



The End of Leasing? And do you care?

95 messages,  Last post on Sep 03, 2008 at 4:58 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Chrysler, Automotive News, Coupe, Hatchback, Truck


Messages Page 4 of 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#31 of 95
I always buy by nippononly
Jul 28, 2008 (11:42 am)
Reply
rather than lease, but the few times I have looked into the lease alternative, there has been almost no "savings" in the monthly payment anyway! And of course that completely ignores that I will have at least some equity in my owned car at the end of 3 years, none at all in my leased car.
 
I could never figure out why anyone would lease, so this is an illuminating discussion.
 
As was mentioned above, there is no way the entry-lux companies can afford to stop leasing, that's how they move 50% or more of their volume vehicles off the showroom floor. Ditto BMW from what I have read, and probably Mercedes too.
 
I could see leasing stopping for mondo-guzzlers like the Suburban and Escalade, for instance, as well as many other SUVs. But I bet as full-size pick-up sales drop even further into the abyss, Ford GM and Toyota will be very tempted to offer subvented leases on them. Which of course would be shooting themselves in the foot, as the lease returns on these models will do terribly in the used market. So I hope for their sakes they don't.
#32 of 95
No More GM Canada Lease by stmss
Jul 29, 2008 (9:44 am)
Reply
I have heard GM Canada will stop leasing on Aug 1. As, 43% of Canadians lease I suspect you will see an exodus to other manufacturers that still offer leases. Unless, GM, Chrysler lower their pricing more in line with US pricing. Good luck trying to sell a $60,000 Grand Cherokee - even with 0% financing.
#33 of 95
So in an instance... by andre1969
Jul 29, 2008 (9:53 am)
Reply
such as these $219/mo Accords and $199/mo Altimas, what would the catch be, for someone like me? I think they're 39 month leases, and they probably limit you to 10K miles per year. I don't do 10K miles per year with all my cars combined, including running the antiques up to Carlisle and such.
 
I guess the biggest issue would be that at the end of 39 months, I'd have nothing, where if I bought the car, I'd simply have a car with 21 payments left.
#34 of 95
Re: So in an instance... [andre1969] by nippononly
Jul 29, 2008 (3:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Jul 29, 2008 9:53 am)

Yes. Now of course, in most instances you would have a car whose bumper to bumper warranty was about to expire, and you still had 21 payments left. For some, that is not a happy thought.
 
And for you, who wouldn't do all the miles if he leased, there would be no refund for the miles you didn't use, which you may or may not care about. And if you really liked the car, you would have to pay a totally inflated residual to buy it from the leasing company. All the promo leases with big ads in the weekend papers and on TV have inflated residuals to get the monthly payment down, and most still involve a largeish down payment.
 
The $199/mo Camry lease includes a down payment of $2999 plus taxes and fees. They will let you finance all that into the payment if you want and your credit is good enough, but then your payment is like $319/mo, not $199. And $319/mo to drive a base model Camry for 3 years, then hand it back with nothing to show? Not a very good deal IMO. You have to have one of the specific reasons for leasing that some posters have mentioned above.
 
It's curious that GM Canada is stopping all leases soon, and GM USA is not following suit. GM has been getting killed for years on these lease-returns.
#35 of 95
Re: So in an instance... [nippononly] by andre1969
Jul 29, 2008 (5:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Jul 29, 2008 3:57 pm)

The Altima lease I'm looking at says $2999 due at lease signing, and $199 per month for 36 months. 12K miles per year. On the surface, it sounds tempting. That's for a 2.5S with the CVT. Guess if I went for one with a sunroof it might be $20-30 per month more?
 
In contrast, my Intrepid was $2000 down and $347.66 per month...and that was, almost 9 years ago! Hard to believe it's been that long!
 
Plus, I'm a bit irritated with my fleet right now. The LeMans flooded, the Catalina killed a battery, and the Intrepid's a/c is little more than a lukewarm breeze. Having something new is tempting, but it's probably more economical to just blow the $500 or so on the Trep's a/c, the $100 or so the LeMans probably needs for a tuneup and some carb/choke work, and, well, I just blew the $88 for the Catalina 's battery today.
 
Besides, I dunno if I'd be cut out for leasing. The idea of paying on something that I know really isn't MINE at the end of the day, might not set too well with me. And at the end of 36 months, I'd still have nothing and would have to make a decision to buy the thing or get something else. Whereas if I kept the Intrepid, chances are it would still be running in 3 years. Sure, I'd have to dump some money into it...especially for the air conditioning. But I'm sure there's no way that the Trep would set me back, in the course of 3 years, whatever $2999 + $199 per month comes out to!
 
I might actually be able to get by with something smaller than an Altima the next time around, too. Back when I bought my Intrepid, I don't think there was a small car out there that I could tolerate. They were just too cramped for me. Although oddly, I felt comfy in the Neon, but it had enough other issues that I was smart enough to stay away!
 
Nowadays though, the Civic feels like it's grown enough to be fairly comfy for me. The Corolla's still a "10 minute" car (as in, I really want to get out of it and stretch after about 10 minutes). The Sentra and Versa aren't too bad. I think the Mazda3's actually pretty comfy, although if I get a little car I'm going to focus on fuel economy, and it seems more performance-oriented. And while most people seem to hate it, I'm actually impressed with the front seat room in the Cobalt. But again, it's not that fuel efficient for a small car.
#36 of 95
Re: So in an instance... [andre1969] by nippononly
Jul 29, 2008 (7:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Jul 29, 2008 5:24 pm)

Well, you could buy any of these midsize sedans advertised at $199/mo for $20K out the door. If you put down $2K your payments would be around $350/mo, as you say. If you were to lease with $2K down, your payment would be about $229/mo. If as I suspect, that $2999 in the ad is not drive-off, but rather down payment your actual payment would be more like $250/mo. So it IS $100/mo in savings on the payment. That is $3600 over the course of the lease. You would probably have more equity than that after 3 years if you were to buy it, but you are right, if you are sure you will just want to hand the car back after 3 years, then leasing on one of these hugely subvented promo leases is probably the way to go for you.
 
So the question becomes: are you suuuure you are going to want to give it back after 3 years? Because that is the only way you profit from the lease. If you might want to keep it because it is a low-mileage car that you have had since day one, or if your circumstances are such that you will not be able to get a new car (happens to the best of us), or whatever, you will have to pay the inflated residual (the exception to this is folks trying to buy out their leased large SUVs and trucks right now: the manufacturers and leasing companies are giving them WHOPPERS of discounts to keep their vehicles rather than have to take them back). In that case, you will have made the wrong choice.
 
Even when the residuals are reasonable, leasing to own is usually a bad idea, just a way to extend payments beyond the duration of a normal car loan, beyond the end of the car's warranty, and sometimes beyond the end of its useful life.
 
And don't forget the downsides of a lease: you are locked in for the term of the lease regardless of if you still want/need/can afford the car, and if it is damaged/totalled/stolen your down payment and all the monthlies are gone - you don't get paid by the insurance company on a leased car. It doesn't belong to you.
#37 of 95
Re: So in an instance... [andre1969] by lemko
Jul 30, 2008 (6:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Jul 29, 2008 5:24 pm)

Almost any repair cost is cheaper than buying a new car. You get a one-time repair bill versus months and years of car payments. It would take something catastrophic like the tranny puking on the '88 Park Ave for me to get rid of it. I'd say that would be at least a $2,500 repair - much more than the car is worth.
#38 of 95
Re: [edklein] by hudsonthedog
Jul 30, 2008 (6:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: edklein (Jul 26, 2008 5:07 am)

It will be interesting to see if it has an effect on the used car market down the road and car sales in general. I suspect that more people will choose to keep their cars longer when they're no longer forced by the lease to turn them back in every 3-4 years.
 
I've been waiting for that for nearly 20 years. It hasn't really happened like I thought it would and used car prices have remained fairly high.
 
I have NEVER recommended a lease for personal use. The only time a lease makes any sense is when you can write off the payments as a business expense. It's much easier to write off a lease than it is to write off the purchase of a vehicle. But since most people do not use their vehicles primarily for work, leasing doesn't makes sense for them.
 
I've purchased all of my cars. I've always recommended that my friends, relatives, and business collegues buy their vehicles. It's just a smarter move in most cases.
#39 of 95
Re: [hudsonthedog] by fezo
Jul 30, 2008 (6:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: hudsonthedog (Jul 30, 2008 6:19 am)

If you really want to have the new car every few years buying is still the better option. A friend of mine has been doing that for years. Before that he had one car that he kept forever. Now he buys a Subaru Outback, takes it to 50K and either trades it in or sells it privately if he has a ready buyer. He swears by this method.
 
I'm still one who holds onto the car forever so it doesn't much matter to me.
#40 of 95
Re: [fezo] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jul 30, 2008 (9:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Jul 30, 2008 6:30 am)

There MIGHT be one advantage to leasing:
 
If you lease a first year model car that turns out to be a DOG of a car, that is bad enough to disappoint you but not bad enough to quality under Lemon Law, you get to dump it at the end of 36 months if you can't turn it in under a lemon law. If you had owned it, perhaps it would have such a bad reputation after 36 months, you couldn't give it away and would have to sell at a huge loss. Who wants to buy Consumer Reports' "Worst Car"?
 
One thing that leasees don't seem to grasp is that money "up front" you are asked to pay is like throwing your money out the window of the car while you are on the freeway. You're just making advance payments on your monthly dues. Like paying extra rent in advance to your landlord and thinking you got a bargain when he lowers your monthly rent by $50 a month.

Messages Page 4 of 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement