Sign In Join 



How does gas at $4 and higher impact you?

2183 messages,  Last post on Nov 21, 2009 at 5:13 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Gasoline, Fuel Efficiency (MPG)


Messages Page 89 of 219
1
...
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
...
219
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#876 of 2183
Re: In tribute to all those fine Wall Streeters... [kernick] by larsb
Sep 24, 2008 (9:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: kernick (Sep 24, 2008 9:18 am)

kernick says, "Lower income people either didn't have money for gas, or they're skimping on other things to buy gas, while people who are better-off maybe don't really care about the price now"
 
I think the evidence disputes that thought. It's not merely "lower income people" who are driving 11 billion fewer miles each month. It's people from MOST economic levels, possibly excepting the very very rich. ( Although P Diddy recently said he's not flying his private plane nearly as often these days, since it was costing him about $200K per flight. )
 
Maybe ALL income levels have felt the effect.
 
Regardless, it's good that we are moving away from gasoline excesses. We have enough excess consumption in this country, so anything that reduces our excess is a good thing in most people's views.
#877 of 2183
Re: here we go again? [oldfarmer50] by gagrice
Sep 24, 2008 (9:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Sep 24, 2008 9:29 am)

Regulations will be the biggest stumbling block to alternatives such as wind and solar. Getting a permit in San Diego is a several year proposition for adding anything to your property. I would say if the addition does not generate more tax revenue it is likely to be denied. I have not seen any solar in the town our old house is in. There is a lot of solar in the County. Much looser regs. The suburban cities are looking for more revenue and all permits will reflect that. They are building a very large subdivision on top of the mountain behind our old place. Not a solar panel on any of them. And they all have a clear shot to the South.
#878 of 2183
Re: here we go again? [gagrice] by larsb
Sep 24, 2008 (9:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Sep 24, 2008 9:40 am)

There are not many cities who have anti-solar panel ordinances.
 
There was a case in CA recently where a neighbor had a tree blocking another neighbor's solar panel, and the solar panel guy won the case. Tree had to be cut so it would not block the panels.
 
I think your "solar enemies" opinion for CA is flawed. I think there are FAR more people pushing solar than there are anti-solar agendas.
 
I can look it up and post proof if you want, but that is my "shoot-from-the-hip" quickie opinion.
 
P.S. Found something. Looks like the "localized opposition" is just upset that they might be putting large solar arrays out on open desert land. The don't oppose solar power - they just prefer it to be "rooftop" installations and not to be just taking up space in the open desert.
 
NY Times story
 
Terry Frewin, the chairman of the Sierra Club’s California/Nevada desert committee, wrote to the club’s executive director, Carl Pope, in July, criticizing him for backing large-scale solar projects.
 
“Remote solar arrays destroy all native resources on site, and have indirect and irreversible impacts on surrounding wildernesses,” Mr. Frewin wrote. He urged the Sierra Club to embrace distributed generation as an alternative to the “industrial renewable” option.
#879 of 2183
Re: here we go again? [larsb] by andre1969
Sep 24, 2008 (9:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Sep 24, 2008 9:46 am)

There was a case in CA recently where a neighbor had a tree blocking another neighbor's solar panel, and the solar panel guy won the case. Tree had to be cut so it would not block the panels.
 
Just out of curiosity, what was there first? The tree or the solar panel? I could see if the solar panel had been there for ages and the neighbors planted a fast-growing tree that blocked it. But if the tree was there first, I say tough ta-ta's.
 
Back in the 80's, the neighbors behind us got satellite tv. Unfortunately, the trees in our back yard, established old Poplar trees that were probably 80 feet tall, were blocking the signal, so they had someone cut them down...without our permission! That little stunt cost them about $4,000, as I recall.
#880 of 2183
Re: here we go again? [andre1969] by grbeck
Sep 24, 2008 (11:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Sep 24, 2008 9:56 am)

I would be curious to know, too. Although I think that there may be case law stating that if a tree or something else on your property is hampering the ability of neighboring property owners to receive a necessary service, then said tree must either be removed or trimmed. Given that the solar panels are providing a necessary service, the court could have decided that the tree must go.
#881 of 2183
Re: here we go again? [larsb] by gagrice
Sep 24, 2008 (11:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Sep 24, 2008 9:46 am)

That company from AZ with the big solar dishes that are more efficient would be hard pressed to find space in an urban setting. That is one of the projects the green weinies are blocking in CA. It is a project for SDG&E that is needed for them to reach the alternative energy mandate. It is tied up with BLM currently.
#882 of 2183
Re: here we go again? [grbeck] by larsb
Sep 24, 2008 (11:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: grbeck (Sep 24, 2008 11:38 am)

Here is the NY Times story on the case:
 
Redwood = Bad / Solar Panels = Good
 
SUNNYVALE, Calif. — Call it an eco-parable: one Prius-driving couple takes pride in their eight redwoods, the first of them planted over a decade ago. Their electric-car-driving neighbors take pride in their rooftop solar panels, installed five years after the first trees were planted.
 
Trees — redwoods, live oaks or blossoming fruit trees — are usually considered sturdy citizens of the sun-swept peninsula south of San Francisco, not criminal elements. But under a 1978 state law protecting homeowners’ investment in rooftop solar panels, trees that impede solar panels’ access to the sun can be deemed a nuisance and their owners fined up to $1,000 a day. The Solar Shade Act was a curiosity until late last year, when a dispute over the eight redwoods(a k a Tree No. 1, Tree No. 2, Tree No. 3, etc.) ended up in Santa Clara County criminal court.
 
The couple who planted the trees, Carolynn Bissett and Richard Treanor, were convicted of violating the law, based on the complaint of their neighbor, Mark Vargas, and were ordered to make sure that no more than 10 percent of the solar panels are shaded.
 
A few weeks after The San Jose Mercury News wrote about the situation, the first act ended with the couple pruning 10 feet to 15 feet of Tree No. 6’s upper branches. The event drew more cameras than an episode of “Extreme Home Makeover.”
#883 of 2183
Re: In tribute to all those fine Wall Streeters... [duke23] by kdhspyder
Sep 24, 2008 (12:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: duke23 (Sep 23, 2008 7:07 pm)

Noted... $25 donation to the charity of your choice.
 
$4.50 or more as per the RUG national average fuel price as per the EIA data published weeky here...EIA US Retail Gasoline prices - Regular by July 4, 2009 ( I will be 60 on that date ).
 
If the economy tanks and we are revisiting the Great Depression you will understand if my donation is a little late .
#884 of 2183
Re: here we go again? [larsb] by steve_ HOST
Sep 24, 2008 (1:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Sep 24, 2008 9:46 am)

The city of Berkeley CA approved a solar program that will upfront the installation costs of solar panels and recoup the cost with a 20 year property tax assessment. The expectation is that the ~$182 monthly cost will be offset by the utility savings. Assuming there's any banks around to help fund the program left standing.
 
Fat Knowledge
 
Berkeley approves program to loan money to residents for solar systems
#885 of 2183
Re: here we go again? [andre1969] by watkinst
Sep 24, 2008 (2:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Sep 24, 2008 9:56 am)

Little different CA has a state law that says that your trees can not impact your neighbors solar pannels by X percent - idea being that the State wants to remove as many easy roadblocks to investments being made around alternative power especially solar. If you have $40,000 tied up in solar pannels and your neighbor's trees grow up and block your power production the tree is on the loosing end of the battle. Keep in mind solar arays are financially laid out around a 30yr program even a tree planted after the solar panel instalation can become an issue.
 
Regardless of all that fuel prices have impacted my wife and I but only regarding what vehicles we own. But we changed up our vehicle program back in 2003. I reduced my weekly use from 20gallons to 6 gallons by getting a Scooter and riding that about 80% of the time to work. We did end up buying an old SUV in late 2003 given our smaller car was not capable of hauling our sail boat and camping gear. The SUV is a 1994 Toyota and only gets driven when its full of people or lots of stuff. Both our cars get 25mpg - next cars will be the highest milege vehicles we can buy but will not be hybrids. The new Jetta TDI is high on the list though we are waiting as long as we can to see what other diesel vehicles arrive on US shores.
 
Our driving habits haven't changed but our vehicles have and will continue to change.

Messages Page 89 of 219
1
...
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
...
219
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement