Sign In Join 



How does gas at $4 and higher impact you?

2183 messages,  Last post on Nov 21, 2009 at 5:13 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Gasoline, Fuel Efficiency (MPG)


Messages Page 207 of 220
1
...
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
...
220
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2052 of 2183
Re: drill baby drill [oldfarmer50] by steve_ HOST
Apr 14, 2009 (5:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Apr 14, 2009 5:25 am)

I think the oil companies just try to lease everything they can so their competitors can't. That way they can better control the supply and the price. Untapped resources are like money in the bank to them.
 
Alaska just went through this with Exxon Mobil sitting on a lease for ~30 years with only marginal exploration efforts. When Alaska revoked the lease, Exxon Mobil and its partners protested mightily. And now they are spending money to try to save their leases. (link)
#2053 of 2183
Re: drill baby drill [steve_] by texases
Apr 14, 2009 (5:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Apr 14, 2009 5:41 am)

"I think the oil companies just try to lease everything they can so their competitors can't. That way they can better control the supply and the price. Untapped resources are like money in the bank to them. "
 
Sorry, even if that was true decades ago, OPEC and other foreign countries have much more control of oil price than do domestic producers. Natural gas prices have plummeted because of the rapid development of new gas fields in the US. So much for oil (or gas) companies controlling prices.
#2054 of 2183
Re: drill baby drill [texases] by steve_ HOST
Apr 14, 2009 (6:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: texases (Apr 14, 2009 5:45 am)

When Alaska said they were going to pull the leases at Port Thomson and auction them off again, they had plenty of interest from potential bidders.
 
There's a big hunk of natural gas up there that could have been to market 20 years ago, lowering prices then. Part of the behind the scenes flack right now is that the state gave pipeline rights to a Canadian company instead of ConocoPhilips to get Port Thomson gas to the Midwest.
 
Exxon and its partners (including Conoco) wanted to delay field development even further to give Conoco a chance to do their own pipeline, locking out the Canadian company as long as possible.
 
And now that the state has forced their hand, Exxon is spending money to develop the field and save their rights in the gas.
 
When gas got to $4, there was so much demand to drill, there were no rigs left to rent. Now that demand has crashed, no one wants to spend the money to develop the resource to insure a steady supply. It'll be boom and bust all over again.
#2055 of 2183
Re: drill baby drill [steve_] by gagrice
Apr 14, 2009 (6:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Apr 14, 2009 6:00 am)

There's a big hunk of natural gas up there that could have been to market 20 years ago, lowering prices then. Part of the behind the scenes flack right now is that the state gave pipeline rights to a Canadian company instead of ConocoPhilips to get Port Thomson gas to the Midwest.
 
There are several problems with that idea. First the same people do not own the gas as the oil. Second there is no pipeline to get the gas to the Midwest. The US government and others have fought against a pipeline through Canada since I got there in 1970. The only way to get it down the existing line is liquefied. Which brings up a host of problems. The Existing line is actually way past its expected life span. They keep replacing sections that are worn thin. I believe most of the gas is owned by some TX company. Add to that the gas being re-injected is what helps keep the flow of oil going.
 
First build a pipeline through Canada, which the state is working on. Then we can get gas to the market where it is needed. Liquefying and hauling in ships to the West Coast does not make a lot of sense. It would probably end up in Japan, China or Korea. I would rather see it saved for future generations in the US.
 
Buying gas from the huge fields in places like Qatar seems more reasonable to me.
 
So what happens if TX pulls out of the Union. Most of the gas in the lower 48 comes from TX.
 
Perry continued: "Millions of Texans are tired of Washington, DC trying to come down here to tell us how to run Texas."
 
A number of recent federal proposals are not within the scope of the federal government’s constitutionally designated powers and impede the states’ right to govern themselves. HCR 50 affirms that Texas claims sovereignty under the 10th Amendment over all powers not otherwise granted to the federal government.
 
It also designates that all compulsory federal legislation that requires states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties, or that requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding, be prohibited or repealed.

 
Can TX secede from the Union?
#2056 of 2183
Re: drill baby drill [gagrice] by fintail
Apr 14, 2009 (8:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Apr 14, 2009 6:27 am)

You can't not imagine if a state tries to secede, the Feds will put it under military occupation and declare martial law.
#2057 of 2183
Re: drill baby drill [fintail] by vcheng
Apr 14, 2009 (8:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Apr 14, 2009 8:02 am)

I think Texas has the right to secede enshrined in the constitution. It has to break into five states if it does so I vaguely recall.
 
from: http://www.snopes.com/history/american/texas.asp
 
Snopes has this claim as TRUE.
#2058 of 2183
Re: drill baby drill [gagrice] by steve_ HOST
Apr 14, 2009 (8:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Apr 14, 2009 6:27 am)

There are several problems with that idea
 
Nothing that couldn't have been worked out over the 30 years that the parcels have been leased. But nothing happened.
 
Every time Texas threatens to sucede, just say "go ahead." That always shuts them up.
#2059 of 2183
Re: drill baby drill [vcheng] by fintail
Apr 14, 2009 (9:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: vcheng (Apr 14, 2009 8:28 am)

Doesn't mean lethal force wouldn't be used to change their minds...
 
If history proves anything, constitutions are worth barely more than the paper they are printed on.
#2060 of 2183
Re: drill baby drill [fintail] by nippononly
Apr 14, 2009 (12:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Apr 14, 2009 9:25 am)

Nah, every state has the right to secede. I can't see it being in any of their interests to do so, although doubtless many folks in Texas (and California) too might be very interested in the idea. The cold hard reality of it is pretty daunting (building an army for defense, establishing diplomatic ties with other nations etc)
#2061 of 2183
Re: drill baby drill [vcheng] by snakeweasel
Apr 14, 2009 (4:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: vcheng (Apr 14, 2009 8:28 am)

I think Texas has the right to secede enshrined in the constitution.
 
They tried it once, didn't work to well for them.

Messages Page 207 of 220
1
...
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
...
220
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement