Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views How does gas at $4 and higher impact you?
2183 messages, Last post on Nov 21, 2009 at 5:13 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: larsb (Nov 07, 2008 6:29 am) Who might THEY be? This bill was to authorize purchasing bonds for $9.95 Billion. The best hope is no one with half a brain will loan them the money. If you had read the proposal as I have you would see just how lame the calculations are in favor of this boondoggle. They calculated how much gas would be wasted with people sitting for hours in gridlock. Adding that to the revenue of the system. How do we know they were not waiting in gridlock to get into the parking lot of this proposed HST? All that aside. The state cannot afford to add another $45 billion to their debt load. They are HOPING the Feds and big investors will get caught up in the boondoggle. Several Peer Reviews including the one from UC Berkeley are less than encouraging. Then add the lawsuits by environmentalists wanting to protect lands proposed for the train to travel. This is not AZ where you go out in the desert and put up a Coal fired generator or a Nuclear Power Plant. This is CA where the wind, geothermal and solar systems proposed on public lands have been blocked by environmental groups. |
|
|
Replying to: larsb (Nov 07, 2008 6:39 am) I think they are. And they will not lose money. They will get the bond and spend it on studies. They will spread the wealth to the agencies involved and NOTHING will be done when the money has run out. You are blind to reality my friend. When you sit and watch billions wasted on projects that never get off the ground you become a skeptic. This HST project has been draining our coffers since at least 1995. Look at THE State website and the extensive studies and reviews. You think that was all volunteer labor? Almost half the voters know the facts and voted against the proposition. It was voted down before. This time the added just enough lies to convince those that are too lazy to dig deep. "The current high-speed rail plan is a fairy tale," said Adrian Moore, vice president of research at Reason Foundation and the study's project director. "The proposal suggests these high-speed trains will be the fastest ever; the most-ridden ever; the cheapest ever; and will convince millions of Californians they no longer need to drive or fly. "Offering up a best-case scenario is one thing, but actually depending on all of these miracles to happen simultaneously is irresponsible public policy." http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/09/28/perspective/z8f5487dadc486544882574c9- 000134a9.txt |
|
|
You guys want to give it a rest and let others comment on how $4... $3 ... er, $2 a gallon gas affects them? Thanks. |
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Nov 07, 2008 7:02 am) The rail is designed to save drivers from spending $2 or $3 or $5 a gallon on gas. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Nov 07, 2008 7:02 am) I'm glad for that. 
|
|
|
Replying to: nippononly (Nov 07, 2008 7:42 am) I was able to fill my tank from just under half the other day for $22 and then a couple days after that I was able to fill 8.9 gallons for $17ish. It's kind of nice. |
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Nov 07, 2008 7:02 am) But all is not lost for high-speed rail fans in California. Farmers can load the empty passenger trains up with chickens, cows, pigs, etc., and allow them to roam freely in the train, thus meeting the requirements of Proposition 2. Maybe they can even have porters serve the animals their feed... Farm animals would thus not be confined, and even expand their sight-seeing opportunities, too. The rail lines would be ensured a steady stream of passengers.
|
|
|
Replying to: grbeck (Nov 07, 2008 8:54 am) |
|
|
Replying to: nippononly (Nov 07, 2008 7:42 am) Like anyone else I would like it if my Tahoe got 20+ MPG and that I could have a city car that got 60+ even if Gas was $1.50 and for sure if it is $4.00. But we need to get mass transit going in all of our states if we are going to have any "real" lasting effect on our energy useage in this country. I can remember many times being in these forums and hearing people complain how fuel was just too cheap in the US. They even suggested that the solution to our transportation problems would be higher fuel prices. But there is always a cause and effect and even if I drove less, which I do, the increased cost of transporting goods has effected me even more than the cost of fuel for my car.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: boaz47 (Nov 07, 2008 9:52 am) Yes, I have noticed a lot of that too. A report on the news last night said food price increases have outstripped inflation for the second or third (I forget which) year in a row this year and are expected to increase even more steeply in 2009. I notice that just as much as I notice gas prices. The reasons they gave included increasingly expensive animal feed and transport costs, both of which are highly dependent on the cost of diesel. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views How does gas at $4 and higher impact you?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
