Sign In Join 



Honda Pilot vs Mazda CX-9 vs Toyota Highlander

478 messages,  Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 7:13 AM

You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mazda CX-9, Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander, Car Comparisons, SUV

2009 Honda Pilot vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2008 Toyota Highlander - Although we've been hearing about a mad dash to get out of sport-utility vehicles and into fuel-efficient compacts, the reality is that seven- and eight-passenger crossover SUVs like the 2008 Mazda CX-9, 2008 Toyota Highlander and 2009 Honda Pilot aren't going away anytime soon. (more)


Messages Page 40 of 48
1
...
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
...
48
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#390 of 478
Re: Mercedes test drive? [wdhyte] by ceric
Sep 01, 2009 (9:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: wdhyte (Aug 31, 2009 6:45 pm)

>> But what's this nonsense that I can't change them?
 
Certainly you can do it by yourself.
The HID bulbs of CX9 is not extremely white (somewhere around 4500k only).
Many have replaced it with other bulbs that are higher in K. It depends on whether you like them or not. For me, those OE are fine.
HID needs to have clear cut-off at top edge to prevent blinding the on-coming traffic. Have you seen the non-HID vehicles with HID bulbs coming at you?!
Their lights are blinding, therefore, dangerous to others.
I believe it is DoT requirement to have clear cut-off at top edge. I am not entirely sure about this. One certainly can google the vehicle codes for it.
 
Replacing HID (right hand side - from driver seat view) requires removing the coolant tank (reservoir). That is probably why some rumor (maybe started by dealers) that you need dealers to replace the bulb. Not true. If you are handy, you can do anything. Removing the coolant tank is actually a 5-minute job.
 
#391 of 478
Re: Mercedes test drive? [ceric] by wdhyte
Sep 01, 2009 (10:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: ceric (Sep 01, 2009 9:52 am)

cool..yep, my middle name is handy actually, house/cars/bikes/etc., if its elec or mech I'll tackle it...being as its still so new (<500 mi) I'll prob defer to the dealer until it starts costing me for stuff, then I'll take care of it. sounds like the bulbs wouldn't be all that big a deal...thanks for the rep ceric.
#392 of 478
Re: Mercedes test drive? [ceric] by aviboy97
Sep 02, 2009 (6:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: ceric (Aug 31, 2009 2:10 pm)

You have to show a valid title to prove that you own a Mazda for the loyalty program rebate. One owned by your immediate family (husband/wife) members may also be allowed (check with the salesperson).
 
Mazda employee here...close, but, not quite!
 
To qualify for the Owner Loyalty Rebate you need to show a current registration for the Mazda that is already owned plus a valid drivers license. This rebate is transferable in household only. Only family members living under the same roof can benefit from this rebate.
#393 of 478
Re: Mercedes test drive? [aviboy97] by ceric
Sep 02, 2009 (8:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (Sep 02, 2009 6:20 am)

That's why having you around here is nice. Thanks for clarifying.
 
#394 of 478
Re: Mercedes test drive? [ceric] by aviboy97
Sep 02, 2009 (12:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ceric (Sep 02, 2009 8:54 am)

That's why having you around here is nice. Thanks for clarifying
 
Anytime
#395 of 478
Golf Bag test? by 4kids3dogs2cat
Sep 17, 2009 (12:08 pm)
Reply
Has anyone done a comparison as to which of these cars (and the Lambda cars) can and can not fit a golf bag w/ clubs in the back of the car lengthwise? TIAFAR.
#396 of 478
sales, Sep, 2009 by ceric
Oct 01, 2009 (12:16 pm)
Reply
Toyota Highlander: 5216
Honda Pilot: 5438
Mazda CX9: 1390
#397 of 478
Re: sales, Sep, 2009 [ceric] by legacygt
Oct 09, 2009 (12:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ceric (Oct 01, 2009 12:16 pm)

Considering that Toyota sells nearly 10 times as many vehicles as Mazda, I would imagine that Mazda is pretty happy with the way the CX9 is selling vs. the Highlander. I'm most surprised by the Pilot's success. This car has be universally panned by reviewers, most of whom agree that the current model is a step backwards. On top of that the car is expensive, ugly as can be, and somewhat truck-like in a market that is supposedly moving away from that image. I guess brand loyalty and a reputation for quality can go a long way.
#398 of 478
Re: sales, Sep, 2009 [legacygt] by citivas
Oct 09, 2009 (1:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: legacygt (Oct 09, 2009 12:09 pm)

It’s not even remotely true that the new Pilot was “almost universally panned” by the reviewers. The reviews were actually unusually polarized – usually there is a general consensus on a car in the professional community but in this case it got panned by some and lavishly lauded by others. Numerous prestigious sources gave it the top of its class or named it Car (or SUV) of the Year. So you must be reading a pretty selected subset of the major auto mags to come up with your conclusion.
 
It’s also not fair to dismiss it as brand loyalty or quality. Our family were die-hard Toyota/Lexus fans, having had several vehicles from them and liked them all. We started out specifically looking at the Highlander and only considered other cars when we couldn’t bring ourselves to accept the significant compromises and limitations of that car. We test drive the Pilot early on and didn’t expect to end up with it because we didn’t like the look or finishes. But we did because in terms of features it was unmatched. Others who’ve posted here and elsewhere have said the same. In our case we weren’t even that price sensitive – we looked at the BMV, Audi, Acura, etc. too and none of them had all the benefits of the new Pilot. So we ended up with it by process of elimination – our first Honda ever. And it has become our favorite car ever. All five of my immediate family (including three kids), plus both set of grandparents love the pilot. One set of grandparents even has the Highlander Hybrid and now regret they didn’t get the Pilot. Our other car is a high-end Toyota Sienna and no one ever wants to be in it if they have a choice between it and the Pilot. It gets slightly better gas mileage than the Sienna too, and the Honda navigation blows the Toyota’s away. The full iPod integration is a favorite too – I couldn’t believe that they didn’t offer than in the Acura MDX cousin of the Pilot.
#399 of 478
Re: sales, Sep, 2009 [citivas] by legacygt
Oct 12, 2009 (10:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: citivas (Oct 09, 2009 1:27 pm)

Reviews for the current Pilot were pretty poor, particularly in light of the praise showered on the prior version. Sure there were some decent reviews but Edmunds doesn't rank it too highly There are certainly plenty of good things you can say about it. This segment of the market has a lot of interesting cars and, unlike the minivan segment, they're not all marching to the beat of the same drummer. They all have strengths and there's something for everyone. The Pilot has great tech options and if you need 3 kids seats in the second row of your crossover, this is the one to get. But it has some major shortcomings as well:
Fuel economy is no better than competition even though the car is neither extraordinarily powerful nor big.
The styling is not particularly attractive although I guess some may like it.
The brakes are pretty poor -- the Pilot may score well on crash tests but an additional 25 feet in 60-0 distance (vs. the CX-9) could mean the difference between a crash and a non-event.
The price is relatively high and, if they're selling this well, dealers don't need to be as flexible in negotiations.
Some may enjoy the Pilot. Is it better than the Highlander? I think so but that's faint praise. The Highlander (while also a strong seller) is not really a standout in this class either. It has a nice combination of power and fuel efficiency but there isn't too much else to distinguish it.
We test drove many cars in this segment and, like I said, there's something for everyone. But for our family, the CX-9 and the GM Acadia/Enclave/Traverse stood out as being ahead of the pack. The Pilot and Highlander have some appeal but so do many others and I would say that if you take away the power of their brands, they are swimming in the same pool as the Hyundai Veracruz and Subaru Tribeca -- also good cars but not necessarily standouts.

Messages Page 40 of 48
1
...
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
...
48
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement