Honda Pilot vs Mazda CX-9 vs Toyota Highlander

478 messages, Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 7:13 AM

You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mazda CX-9, Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander, Car Comparisons, SUV

2009 Honda Pilot vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2008 Toyota Highlander - Although we've been hearing about a mad dash to get out of sport-utility vehicles and into fuel-efficient compacts, the reality is that seven- and eight-passenger crossover SUVs like the 2008 Mazda CX-9, 2008 Toyota Highlander and 2009 Honda Pilot aren't going away anytime soon. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 4 of 48: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; ...; 48; Prev; Next; Last

#28 of 478 Re: Availability of accessories and else [ceric] by ericw2000 Jul 09, 2008 (11:56 am)
Replying to: ceric (Jul 09, 2008 10:00 am) The availability of accessories will increase as the popularity of the vehicle increases. I'm seeing more and more CX-9s as time passes. I purchased my CX-9 2 weeks ago. I tried the Pilot, and FWIW my wife drives a Honda Odyssey which is the best van out there hands down, so I have a positive experience with Honda. I found the Pilot to be "frumpy" in both looks and performance. The only thing I'd like to see in the CX-9 is auto locks and a trip computer.
#29 of 478 Pilot vs Highlander vs Veracruz may have been better comparo by klossfam Jul 09, 2008 (12:13 pm)
The CX-9 is simply more comparable to the OutlookCadia than the Pilot or Highlander...It's substantially longer (it has 11 inches on the Highlander - just like the General's 200 inch long rigs)...So this is a goofy comparison in many ways...The Veracruz is a better size/price equivalent. That being said - I traded a 2004 Pilot EX-L for a 2008 Highlander Limited (due as much to the lack of Pilot power as the horrific look of the 2009 Pilot - both totally unacceptable). Honda/Acura is also WAY BEHIND in outfitting proper brakes on their vehicles...I had a TL-S and TSX - and the brakes where weak at best/dangerous at most...I have a 2008 G35 - so now I know what actual automobile brakes are! The Highlander review is accurate...Great acceleration and powertrain, great brakes but little feel from the electric steering and a little soft when you are coming from an older Pilot (and my last two cars were the G and a 2006 A4). Still - I tow a 4200 lb boat which eliminated all but the Pilot and Highlander. The 2004 Pilot pulled this boat pretty well but I saw no way the new Pilot with the extra pounds could handle it. The Highlander has no issues and the 5000 lb towing capacity is not over stated...it really is the only choice for a V6 crossover tow vehicle. I liked the General's Lamda offerings but an extra foot of length and the associated weight did me no good...and I can vouch for the Highlanders mileage (around 21 mpg in mixed driving and even close to 15 mpg pulling the boat and having 4 passengers and all kinds of crap). An impressive crossover and you can smoke almost any other truck in a stoplight drag... Replies to this message: nxs138 (Jul 09, 2008 2:12 pm) cx7lover (Jul 11, 2008 9:03 pm)
#30 of 478 Re: Pilot vs Highlander vs Veracruz may have been better comparo [klossfam] by nxs138 Jul 09, 2008 (2:12 pm)
Replying to: klossfam (Jul 09, 2008 12:13 pm) We bought a CX-9, but the Highlander would have been our second choice. I liked the acceleration on the Highlander, it feels faster off the line than the CX-9, and liked the fact that it has captain's chairs in the 2nd row. However it's the little things that started adding up: the cheap felt lining on the roof, the lack of a split 3rd row seat (we've made use of the split row many times on the CX-9), the numb electric steering, the fake looking wood in the Limited, the small amount of space behind the 3rd row, and most importantly, the high price that dealers force on you with all the dumb package options. We would have likely chosen a Sport model since we really didn't like the wood in the Limited, and it was at a better price point, but in the end the Mazda just rode more like a car and we got a much better deal from our Mazda dealer on the GT. I think the Highlander is perfect for those who might have 2 kids and have very occasional use of the 3rd row.
#31 of 478 Re: [cx7lover] by mdhutton Jul 09, 2008 (4:23 pm)
Replying to: cx7lover (Jul 08, 2008 4:46 pm) You're right - the attitude display was from the dealer, not Mazda corporate. But...he's representing the brand. He IS the company to his customers and prospects. If that's the type of treatment folks receive, they're bound to go elsewhere -- either to another dealer or a competitor. So far, my treatment by Toyota has been abysmal at one dealer (I walked out), yet supurb at another 40 miles away. Night and day to the highest degree! Service after the sale, follow-up, very flexible and fair negotiations, I could go on and on. There are good and bad stories at every dealer, so find what works for you, as we all should. Replies to this message: cx7lover (Jul 10, 2008 3:26 am) qs933 (Jul 12, 2008 12:18 pm)
#32 of 478 Re: [ceric] by qs933 Jul 09, 2008 (10:20 pm)
Replying to: ceric (Jul 09, 2008 9:35 am) I have never been treated with a loaner at Honda/Toyota dealers. Have you? My Toyota dealer provides loaners when they have to keep the vehicle overnight (in other words, more than just an oil change). The last time I required a loaner, they had a fleet of Echo loaners, though last time I was there, I think they upgraded to Corollas. Replies to this message: ceric (Jul 10, 2008 10:09 am)
#33 of 478 Re: [mdhutton] by cx7lover Jul 10, 2008 (3:26 am)
Replying to: mdhutton (Jul 09, 2008 4:23 pm) Some might think that they're representing Mazda, but anyone that has bought multiple cars from multiple dealers should soon realize that most dealer service is YMWV and is not a representative of the Company. Mazda dealers vary a LOT, Honda dealers, you're usually going to need an appointment and the service is going to be poor. Mazda-Galpin in CA gives you a loaner whenever you ask for one, you just need to put a deposit down. Replies to this message: qs933 (Jul 12, 2008 12:18 pm)
#34 of 478 Re: [qs933] by ceric Jul 10, 2008 (10:09 am)
Replying to: qs933 (Jul 09, 2008 10:20 pm) My local Mazda dealer gives loaners for major service (such as 30K/60K) and repairs (hopefully not happening) just like your average Lexus dealers. I used to be a Honda guy, but I think I am switching camp to Mazda because I am getting to like their designs and the service of my local dealer.
#35 of 478 Re: Pilot vs Highlander vs Veracruz may have been better comparo [klossfam] by cx7lover Jul 11, 2008 (9:03 pm)
Replying to: klossfam (Jul 09, 2008 12:13 pm) I just wanted to add my comments, the CX-9 feels every bit as manageable as my CX-7... although it's dimensionally longer, it doesn't feel that way.
#36 of 478 Re: [cx7lover] by qs933 Jul 12, 2008 (12:18 pm)
Replying to: cx7lover (Jul 10, 2008 3:26 am) Mazda dealers vary a LOT, Honda dealers, you're usually going to need an appointment and the service is going to be poor. Sorry, your generalization does not work both ways. What you stated right before that, about the YMMV-ness of dealers, is going to be true for all manufacturers, including Honda. Some dealers are just plain better than other dealers that sell the same vehicles. It doesn't matter if it's Honda, Mazda, or Toyota.
#37 of 478 No... by cx7lover Jul 13, 2008 (5:22 am)
Honda dealers everywhere are overworked and understaffed. - And they're quick to deny a warranty claim. Replies to this message: mdhutton (Jul 13, 2008 8:21 am) qs933 (Jul 13, 2008 2:41 pm)