Honda Pilot vs Mazda CX-9 vs Toyota Highlander

478 messages, Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 7:13 AM

You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mazda CX-9, Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander, Car Comparisons, SUV

2009 Honda Pilot vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2008 Toyota Highlander - Although we've been hearing about a mad dash to get out of sport-utility vehicles and into fuel-efficient compacts, the reality is that seven- and eight-passenger crossover SUVs like the 2008 Mazda CX-9, 2008 Toyota Highlander and 2009 Honda Pilot aren't going away anytime soon. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 24 of 48: 1; ...; 21; 22; 23; 24; 25; 26; 27; ...; 48; Prev; Next; Last

#229 of 478 Re: [qs933] by citivas Sep 04, 2008 (7:40 pm)
Replying to: qs933 (Sep 03, 2008 10:46 pm) No, I was referring to Toyota as CYNICAL not cyclical. And if you followed all the posts you'd see that memory seats have already been annoucned for the 2009. My point remains the same -- to intentionally hold back Limited options Toyota has already developed for the same seat and that they know some of their customers will want just so they can use it as a selling point for a new model a few years later is cynical, or certainly not very respectful to their customers. I will grant you this -- clearly if Toyota believed it was a make-or-break for a huge portion of customers they wouldn't do this. But they know it is an issue for a subset of customers and they don't hold it back as you suggest for economic reasons (since they would profit from it) or because they can't prioritize it (since they've already developed it for the seats they are re-purposing from other models). Their sole reason is to have a marketing point for a new model year. They have it planned that way from before the first car of the first model year every sees the light of day. Replies to this message: qs933 (Sep 04, 2008 10:09 pm) ch1rravu (Sep 05, 2008 6:09 am) citivas (Sep 05, 2008 6:42 am) qs933 (Sep 06, 2008 2:27 am) and 1 more... aviboy97 (Sep 09, 2008 6:22 am)
#230 of 478 Re: August sales [kanada] by citivas Sep 04, 2008 (7:42 pm)
Replying to: kanada (Sep 04, 2008 3:23 pm) I don't think so. There are a LOT available. There is no shortage. Which is why Mazda is offering $3-4K incentives on them. Try searching inventories online. There are hundreds in-stock within 20 miles of me. I really like this car so this is not a dis, just refuting the idea that their sales figures are low due to limited availability.
#231 of 478 Re: August sales [ceric] by citivas Sep 04, 2008 (7:45 pm)
Replying to: ceric (Sep 04, 2008 9:17 am) I'm curious what features, unrelated to drive and styling, you liked in the CX-9 but coudln't get in either of the other two? Replies to this message: ceric (Sep 04, 2008 9:48 pm)
#232 of 478 Re: August sales [citivas] by ceric Sep 04, 2008 (9:48 pm)
Replying to: citivas (Sep 04, 2008 7:45 pm) To me, what were missing..(in Jan, 2008) Highlander: HID headlights, split 3rd row, power front seats (w/ memory) Pilot: HID headlights, smart-key system, amber signal lights (dislike red ones), also, 6-speed tranny with M-mode.
#233 of 478 Re: [citivas] by qs933 Sep 04, 2008 (10:09 pm)
Replying to: citivas (Sep 04, 2008 7:40 pm) And if you followed all the posts you'd see that memory seats have already been annoucned for the 2009. Yes, I've been following the posts. Thanks for asking. You may want to double check that post you're referring to (#217, I believe), as it mentions that an 8-way power driver's seat will be optional on the 4-cylinder model that's introduced in January. An 8-way power driver's seat is already standard on the Sport and Limited. There's nothing about a memory option being added. If I'm looking in the wrong place, please share your source. I'm curious where the Highlander's seats are being repurposed from? Which model shares the same seats? Maybe you'd be happier if Toyota took the approach Chrysler did with their full size vans, where a mid-80s van was essentially the same as one bought 10 years later, with no new features or improvements over the vehicle's life cycle?
#234 of 478 Re: [citivas] Who pays for new model-year's development costs? by ch1rravu Sep 05, 2008 (6:09 am)
Replying to: citivas (Sep 04, 2008 7:40 pm) Everybody knows it costs more than a billion to launch a new model (with platform sharing, portions of costs be shared too, good for'em). Obviously, you can't give new model (which cost'em billion+), and all the possible features. If there is one thing Toyota good about doing -- it brings Lexus engines/transmissions to common folks vehicles (Toyota) real fast. Talk about VVT-i, variable intake, variable exhaust, direct-injection, 6-speed transmissions, electric-steering, 50-state strict emissions, excellent MPG, and Hybrids. These are buzzwords talked-about by any other Luxo-makers, where as, Toyota brings'em to low-priced models real fast., more importantly, makes'em real affordable to you-and-me folks !! By the way, all these features work now, and will work 12 years from now (its not like a pricey 5-transistor radio is necessarily better than 1 transistor radio, 60's lore ) What it can't offer is free/cheap-priced third-party/suppliers sourced parts., because real money goes-out for each such feature !! If all you want is more bang-for-buck, but have questionable reliability/resale/warranty-support/dealer-network/reputation., try a korean-make/korean-sourced-vehicle or something .. Replies to this message: citivas (Sep 05, 2008 6:42 am) qs933 (Sep 06, 2008 2:27 am) badself (Sep 06, 2008 4:04 am) aviboy97 (Sep 09, 2008 6:22 am)
#235 of 478 Re: [citivas] Who pays for new model-year's development costs? [ch1rravu] by citivas Sep 05, 2008 (6:42 am)
Replying to: ch1rravu (Sep 05, 2008 6:09 am) This back and forth is getting nowhere. We will just have to agree to disagree and let others decide for themselves. Nothing I say will change your mind about how great Toyota is and so far nothing you have written has changed mine about why they hold back the memory seat features (among others). BTW, I think Toyota is, overall, the best car company in the world. So I'm no hater. I own a Toyota now and have had several Toyota/Lexus' in the past. I'm confident I will again. But to me you're responses seem unnecessarily defensive of them. My point is not that they don't make great cars, overall, or aren't a great engineering and marketing company. My point was that they have made a choice to consciously hold back features that would cost them virtually nothing to offer (due to the fact that they have already developed them and are already basically reusing previously designed parts) and generate a profit as user options on high end trims, for the sole purpose of being able to add it later. I have and still reject your notion that they left it out year one simply to prioritize what they develop or save money on the trim or because they didn’t believe their customer’s wanted it until they got feedback from the first couple years of production. None of these make logical sense given the facts (they have already developed it and are re-using seat designs that include it in other vehicles; it would only improve the profit margin of a Limited trim since it could be an option so the economic argument makes no sense; and they do this consistently with most of their higher-end vehicles in year 2-4, so the idea that each time they didn’t perceive a customer demand for it and only responded after the fact is ludicrous, especially given the lead time for development – they had to already have the memory sat in the ’09 plan before the re-designed ’08 even hit the showroom). Now we may disagree on whether Toyota consciously holding it back from customers for a couple years to introduce as a model upgrade later is cynical. I think it is but that’s just my opinion. But I am stumped that you can cling to the ideas that they held it back for economic, design priority or customer demand reasons. Again, I have no expectation of changing your opinion so I’m just moving on… Replies to this message: qs933 (Sep 06, 2008 2:27 am) badself (Sep 06, 2008 4:04 am)
#236 of 478 Re: [citivas] Who pays for new model-year's development costs? [ch1rravu] by qs933 Sep 06, 2008 (2:27 am)
Replying to: citivas (Sep 05, 2008 6:42 am) My point was that they have made a choice to consciously hold back features that would cost them virtually nothing to offer... 1. Every feature costs something to offer. 2. None of the Toyota press documents regarding the 2009 Highlander mention the addition of a memory seat option for 2009. 3. Still waiting to find out which model shares the same seats as the Highlander. 4. This is all basic product management. There are trade-offs in every product that's developed; you simply can't offer every feature to satisfy every individual need. 5. If basic product management is considered a "cynical" way of doing business, then virtually every for-profit company doing business today is a "cynic." I'll leave it at that. We can pick up this debate in 2011, when I'd expect the mid-cycle refresh to occur and those memory seats to become available. Replies to this message: badself (Sep 06, 2008 4:04 am)
#237 of 478 Re: [citivas] Who pays for new model-year's development costs? [ch1rravu] by badself Sep 06, 2008 (4:04 am)
Replying to: qs933 (Sep 06, 2008 2:27 am) Enough already, to the both of you!
#238 of 478 Re: August sales [ceric] by nxs138 Sep 06, 2008 (3:47 pm)
Replying to: ceric (Sep 03, 2008 12:28 pm) That's not bad at all for the CX-9. If you compare sales as opposed to 2007, the CX-9 does very well in terms of not dropping off sharply month after month. And those 3000 plus CX-9 sales make up a substantial percentage of total Mazda sales--and total Mazda sales have never been anywhere near Honda and Toyota. So Mazda has to be happy with the numbers, probably not as happy with the incentives they have to give, but hey, they have to keep the lines working near capacity, I guess. The Highlander and Pilot, while nice cars, were too "trucky" for my wife's taste. She loves the CX-9, so I guess I have no choice but to be happy...