You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Mazda CX-9
Honda Pilot vs Mazda CX-9 vs Toyota Highlander

472 messages, Last post on Nov 21, 2009 at 5:09 PM
You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
2009 Honda Pilot vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2008 Toyota Highlander - Although we've been hearing about a mad dash to get out of sport-utility vehicles and into fuel-efficient compacts, the reality is that seven- and eight-passenger crossover SUVs like the 2008 Mazda CX-9, 2008 Toyota Highlander and 2009 Honda Pilot aren't going away anytime soon. (more)
|
1st: Pilot: 11276 (some of them are probably older one - no way of knowing) 2nd: Highlander: 8070 (1277 hybrids) = 6793 (excluding hybrids) 3rd: CX-9: 3173 |
|
|
Replying to: qs933 (Sep 01, 2008 4:02 pm) For me that is better than looking down at your dash when viewing the camera while backing up.
|
|
|
Replying to: klam (Sep 03, 2008 12:29 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: ch1rravu (Jul 28, 2008 10:39 am) Folks seems to have posted Aug sales figures. Nice doing Pilot .. I bet Pilot's numbers are mostly due to incentive/rebate pricing more than its real-world MPG .. but gas prices are slowly settling down, mebbe its not as big a concern anymore .? Thoughts guys ..? |
|
|
Replying to: ceric (Sep 03, 2008 12:28 pm)
|
|
|
I'm in the market for a new SUV and both the Honda Pilot and Toyota Highlander are on my short list of rigs to check out. I currently own a 2001 Tahoe, and am looking for something a bit smaller. (but definitely not a compact suv - more like a medium sized suv) I've got a million questions, but my primary one right now is with the size difference between the Highlander and the Pilot. My assumption based on seeing them on the highways is that the Pilot is considerably larger. But after looking at the cubic feet of cargo room I'm perplexed - the Highlander shows a max of 95 cu. ft and the Pilot only 88. (I'm assuming "max cargo" means with all rear seats folded down) Are these 2 suv's really in the same class? Are my eyes deceiving me??
|
|
|
Replying to: citivas (Sep 02, 2008 6:44 am) Sorry; now I think I know what you were referring to: the cyclical (not "cynical") way that Toyota adds features. The product plan is probably set for the entire life cycle of the current design. I'm sure we'll see those memory seats in 2011, which should be the mid-cycle refresh. I'd go back to my original statement, though: if the lack of memory seats was a huge factor for people not purchasing the Highlander, then it's pretty obvious that Toyota is missing the mark by not equipping its vehicles with them from the very start. I would be willing to wager that's not the case and that the feature just isn't as important relative to others. That's not to say it isn't important to you. I guess the same "cyclical" criticism could be applied to all manufacturers and how they manage their products. Honda usually adds a "special edition" in the final year of a design to boost sales. Should owners during the early years of the design feel deprived that it wasn't offered from the very beginning?
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Sep 03, 2008 1:56 pm) If I had to make the choice all over again, I still would buy CX9. Highlander and Pilot simply don't have all the features that I wanted, besides the styling and driving dynamics.
|
|
|
Replying to: eagle63 (Sep 03, 2008 6:10 pm) You should go sit in them and check them out carefully. I usually pick an autoshow (there should be one near you at certain time of the year) and sit in vehicles before my decision is made. Doing this can avoid pressure from salespersons. You should also check out the CX9 while you are at that. It has 100.7cu.ft of cargo space. |
|
|
Replying to: ceric (Sep 03, 2008 12:28 pm)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Mazda CX-9
Honda Pilot vs Mazda CX-9 vs Toyota Highlander
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda CX-9
2010 Honda Pilot
2010 Toyota Highlander



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats