Sign In Join 



BMW 5-Series Real World MPG

21 messages,  Last post on Nov 11, 2009 at 4:51 AM

You are in the BMW 5-Series Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? BMW 5 Series, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Sedan, Wagon


Messages Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#13 of 21
Re: 25MPG on a Turbo Charged Car?? How? [gardis] by carnaught
Dec 26, 2008 (6:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gardis (Dec 26, 2008 12:11 pm)

Whether you believe it or not, I get 28mpg in mixed driving on my '08 535. And no, I do not work for nor am I paid by BMW to say that.
#14 of 21
by gardis
Dec 26, 2008 (7:28 pm)
Reply
Carnaught, not casting aspersions, just tell me how it's possible for a turbo charged engine to get that good mileage. That beats BMW's estimate. Maybe I'm making a mistake with going with a 530i instead of that 535i I saw. Of course, the difference in price is about $4,000. As the salesman explained to me, with twin turbos, there are extra moving parts that are not present on the other engine, so naturally, there would be a chance of problems, though they have not encountered any, so he says.
#15 of 21
Re: 25MPG on a Turbo Charged Car?? How? [carnaught] by richardga73
Dec 27, 2008 (8:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: carnaught (Dec 26, 2008 6:12 pm)

You guys are just funning us. Youre claiming that the 535 gets better mileage than the 335 which weighs 400 lbs less! Come on, you dont really believe the dash computer? Fill up, reset odometer to zero drive till its empty, refill then divide the mileage from zero by the gallons you just filled up. You, I am sure will be shocked by the difference in the ACTUAL mileage and what the computer says. I got about 19 MPG on a 330i no turbo. No way you are getting what you claimed.
#16 of 21
Re: 25MPG on a Turbo Charged Car?? How? [richardga73] by carnaught
Dec 27, 2008 (9:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: richardga73 (Dec 27, 2008 8:43 am)

No way you are getting what you claimed.
 
Ya know, I really don't care if you guys believe me and the other poster(s) who claim great mileage with the twin turbo 6 engine. I've checked my "real mileage" against the computer and it comes out within 2-3mpg of the computer. I see and enjoy the great mileage with each tankful. (My '03 540's mileage was nothing to brag about.)
 
Since I am not a gearhead, I cannot give an explanation for the great mileage other than I am usually the only person in the car and I do not have a heavy foot.
 
Furthermore, I have no personal agenda in disclosing my mileage to this forum. I would not be fooling anyone but myself if I lie or embellish on this.
 
I'm done with this: peace...out.
#17 of 21
Re: 25MPG on a Turbo Charged Car?? How? [carnaught] by richardga73
Dec 28, 2008 (5:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: carnaught (Dec 27, 2008 9:00 am)

ok carnaught, no offense, we believe you. Since you get great mileage tell us something else about the 535. Please dont embellish! Compare to 540. And I guess you drove the 550 before you bought. How about steering feel? I have a Merc E63 and Im still pissed about the numbness of the feedback. How about some comparisons if you have the time between 550, 540, 535, and possibly a 3 if you owned one about your fun quotients. I hear the 535 is more tossable than the 550 due to weight.
#18 of 21
Re: 25MPG on a Turbo Charged Car?? How? [richardga73] by carnaught
Dec 29, 2008 (10:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: richardga73 (Dec 28, 2008 5:26 pm)

No offense taken.
 
I never drove/never considered a 550 after my so so experience with the 540. Although I'm sure 550 owners could testify to the positives of it, I felt that with its lighter weight and similar 0-60mph numbers, the 535 would be comparable to the 8 cylinder with better gas mileage. It fulfilled my expectations with about $5K (?) in savings. The 535 replaced my '06 3 Series and an '09 3 Series replaced an E350 Sport MB.
 
I personally find the 535 ALMOST as fun to drive as the two 3 Series which admittedly feel more nimble especially in the case of the '09. I feel that all of the BMW's despite their (gulp) slush boxes, are much more enjoyable to drive than the Mercedes. They all deliver more distinct road feel and less "numbness" than any of the Mercedes' (and especially the Lexus') I've owned, other than maybe an SL.
 
Keep in mind, much of this is subjective, and therefore IMHO. Others' opinions and experience(s) may vary and the three pedaled models offer even more driving experience.
#19 of 21
to all Bimmer-philes by carnaught
Dec 31, 2008 (3:08 pm)
Reply
(even if you're not)
 
Happy New Year to all !
#20 of 21
1997 528i by bobbybuche
Feb 25, 2009 (6:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: carnaught (Dec 31, 2008 3:08 pm)

i have i 97 528i and on the highway at about 65-70 i get right at 35 mpg so i like that.....alot
#21 of 21
AWD gives at least 2mpg penalty by ishift
Nov 11, 2009 (4:51 am)
Reply
Just traded a 535xi wagon w/a manual trans (yes one of the few). Averaged 18-19 city and 24-26 hwy at 75 - 80 mph. My one month old 2010 535i sedan w/manual (had to order it) is getting 20-21 city so far with the same moderate driving style. That means I'm not afraid to use the power but I don't use it all the time. These numbers come from calculations at fill ups but are also backed up by the computer. Hope this helps. Bottom line is they both beat the sticker mileage. Of course if you read the fine print, the sticker gives a greater range than the big bold numbers anyway.

Messages Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement