Article Comments - Riding in the 2009 Cadillac CTS-V

9 messages, Last post on Jun 20, 2008 at 5:52 PM

You are in the Cadillac CTS/CTS-V Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Cadillac CTS-V, Sedan

Riding in the 2009 Cadillac CTS-V - Meanwhile the V-spec CTS seems entirely unstressed. The exhaust note is not angry and harsh like you'd expect from a race-tuned V8. It's not raspy in the upper sound registers like the stunning Mercedes AMG 6.2-liter V8. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 2 of 2: 1; 2; Prev; Next; Last

#4 of 9 Transmissions by jfjr Jun 12, 2008 (11:08 am)
Why all the fuss over the automatic transmission? Those of us that truly enjoy driving will want the 6-speed manual. I've not heard anything about the shift quality and feel of the Tremec unit and how it compares to the ZR1's version. Some of you "passengers" might question the engineers about this.
#5 of 9 Re: Half-shaft patent [fd2] by jerrywimer Jun 13, 2008 (7:45 am)
Replying to: fd2 (Jun 11, 2008 10:43 am) The Mazda is a front-driver, so you can't really compare. The half-shafts on it were done that way to help deal with torque steer. The CTS-V is rear-wheel-driven, and this is relatively unique (so far, I suppose) for this type of drivetrain.
#6 of 9 why so negative by johnfmoynihan Jun 13, 2008 (4:51 pm)
maybe i'm reading this wrong, but i think this is the first article i've ever read in a car enthusiast publication where somehow going fast (and faster than any other sedan) is a bad thing. oh wait, it's an american product. now i understand. unequal shafts on front drivers are everywhere, even on rather ordinary cars (ohmygosh, even chevys!), and have been for many, many years. he must have made a further innovation.
#7 of 9 Front end? by dubfun Jun 17, 2008 (8:00 pm)
Agree with porscheaq. The regular CTS is an attractive vehicle. It looks like they went to ebay for aftermarket styling on the new CTS-V. I'm a little disappointed that the design team would go for that look; just thought something understated would be in order. Reminds me of the previous gen CTS-V.
#8 of 9 7:59 Nurburgring Time... by uofmg35 Jun 20, 2008 (12:45 pm)
7:59 lap time at the ring ain't shabby. Of course for the same price, the Nissan GT-R does it in 7:38 with 100 less hp. In my opinion that lap time is the ultimate performance measure for these kind of vehicles. The CTS is a great step forward for GM, and I like the base model. But who wants to spend over $60K for a CTS, even if it has 556 hp? Why not keep the price below $50K to have some advantage over the M3? This car is nice to drool over, but even if I wanted to blow $60K on a car (which I'd never do), I wouldn't consider a CTS-V. Replies to this message: aldw (Jun 20, 2008 5:52 pm)
#9 of 9 Re: 7:59 Nurburgring Time... [uofmg35] by aldw Jun 20, 2008 (5:52 pm)
Replying to: uofmg35 (Jun 20, 2008 12:45 pm) It's more of a M5 competitor than an M3 one, but it's worth the money for those who want it. Badge snobbery snubs way too many good cars unfortunately, especially if they're American...