Sign In Join 



Toyota Prius vs VW Golf TDI

519 messages,  Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 11:34 PM

You are in the Toyota Prius Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Toyota Prius, Volkswagen Golf, Diesel, Hybrid Cars, Hatchback, Sedan


Messages Page 4 of 53
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
53
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#22 of 519
Re: Expensive Choices [jpeters1970] by moparbad
Jun 24, 2009 (7:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jpeters1970 (Jun 24, 2009 12:16 pm)

Toyota average 1.01 problems per vehicle and VW 1.12 problems per vehicle in recent JD Power IQ results.
 
.11 difference, big nothing!
 
Consumer Reports surveys are not credible. CR only surveys it's subscribers. JD Powers data is based on a sampling group free from bias and larger sampling size than CR.
 
There is no evidence of difficulty of use or of maintenance of a urea addition emissions system.
#23 of 519
Re: Expensive Choices [moparbad] by wvgasguy
Jun 25, 2009 (3:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Jun 24, 2009 7:34 pm)

Is that initial quality or over time?
 
I've answered a lot of surveys on my cars over the years and seldom do I get a survey after I have 10,000 miles on my car. Initial quality is a lot easier to achieve than long term durability.
 
My AudiTT didn't act up (electronics) until after 10K.
 
My 350Z did start having problems at 3K but the idiots that owned them never told the truth in surveys. A lot of people had the same problem that I had and yet when I saw surveys it didn't seem like a big deal. The tire wear and noise was unbearable. The numerous visits to the dealer were unforgivable.
 
My experience is people, especially on early surveys, are reporting on the car of their (current) dreams and really are not too critical. I guess they justify to themselves they made a good choice.
 
Statistically you may show VW as a close second to Toyota, but in the real world no one believes it, including many VW owners.
#24 of 519
Re: Expensive Choices [moparbad] by wvgasguy
Jun 25, 2009 (3:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Jun 24, 2009 7:34 pm)

Just curious too, your id "moparbad" does that mean you think Mopar's are "bad" as in good? Or that they are bad as in junk?
 
If you're a Mopar fan then I can see how you could easily be fooled into thinking VW makes a durable, reliable car.
#25 of 519
Re: Expensive Choices [wvgasguy] by jpeters1970
Jun 25, 2009 (4:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: wvgasguy (Jun 25, 2009 3:33 am)

HEHEEH I'd have to agree! Mopar almost lost it until Fiat came to the rescue. Based on what I've read on the boards I'd stay away from VW for a while. I'll stick with either Honda or Toyota for reliability.
#26 of 519
JD Power by petl
Jun 25, 2009 (4:55 am)
Reply
JD Power assesses vehicles in 4 categories.
 
1) Performance and Design: Taken from the Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout (APEAL) study, this measure is based on owner satisfaction with vehicle Performance, Style, Features and Instrument Panel, and Comfort.
  
 2) Initial Quality: Taken from the Initial Quality Study (IQS), which looks at owner-reported problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership, this score is based on problems that have caused a complete breakdown or malfunction, or where controls or features may work as designed, but are difficult to use or understand.
  
3) Predicted Reliability: Derived from historical trending for a vehicle and/or manufacturer in our Initial Quality and Vehicle Dependability Studies, Predicted Reliability is a forecast of how reliable a newer vehicle might be over time.
  
4) Overall Dependability: Taken from the Vehicle Dependability Study (VDS), which looks at owner-reported problems in the first 3 years of new-vehicle ownership, this score is based on problems that have caused a complete breakdown or malfunction of any component, feature, or item (i.e., components that stop working or trim pieces that break or come loose).
 
The most recent JD Power survey was Initial Quality which only looked at the first 90 days of ownership (not long term). There may be a big difference in customer satisfaction between the first 90 day IQ and the 3 year Overall Dependability surveys with a specific vehicle.
#27 of 519
Re: Expensive Choices [jpeters1970] by mike91326
Jun 25, 2009 (12:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jpeters1970 (Jun 25, 2009 4:53 am)

Based on the last few JD Power's reports, I'd give Hyundai a good look. If they bring over the Elantra diesel next year it would be a good choice.
#28 of 519
Re: JD Power [petl] by jpeters1970
Jun 25, 2009 (2:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: petl (Jun 25, 2009 4:55 am)

Thanks for that information. It means absolutely nothing because 90 days is really not enough time to gauge whether a vehicle will last over its life expectancy. Bottom line is that MOST cars today are very reliable. The TDI does not scare me, however I'd prefer the Bimmer 330D even though it is a lot more money. That car taken care of properly will outlive me! Heck my best friend's Mercedes Diesels are still going strong since 1981!!!!! Unfortunately the car manufacturers don't seem to be advertising that diesel is CLEAN these days. The TDI commercial is cute but it's not going to make it mainstream like the hybrids are now.
#29 of 519
Re: JD Power [jpeters1970] by jejohns1
Jul 01, 2009 (11:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: jpeters1970 (Jun 25, 2009 2:00 pm)

Plus a diesel engine can run on 100% bio-diesel fuel, B100. If only the manufactures would warranty bio-fuel with their engines, currently they only warranty up to B5 (5% bio-diesel). Why is this important? The gasoline-electric hybrid still relies on fossil fuel petroleum, which we have to import (national security implications) and adds CO2 to the atmosphere. But a 100% bio-diesel can be grown domestically (making farmers happy), and would add no additional CO2 to the atmosphere because the plant used to make the bio-diesel absorbs CO2 while it grows and makes its plant oils, which are then made into bio-diesel which releases the same CO2 back into the atmosphere, in effect net zero CO2 (actually less because not all of the plant is used to make the bio-diesel). You can't get that with a gasoline-electric hybrid. Plus the toxic chemicals and metals used to make the battery are not very environmentally friendly. The bio-diesel on the other hand is non-toxic!
#30 of 519
Re: JD Power [jejohns1] by jpeters1970
Jul 03, 2009 (9:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jejohns1 (Jul 01, 2009 11:53 am)

Since there isn't stringent regulation with respect to bio-diesel you're not going to see manufacturers embrace it in their new new car warranties. I have no doubt that diesel engines run fine on it, it's just that I would not want to chance using it and then have to make a warranty claim in the unlikely event of an engine problem. Car manufacturers are notorious for trying to find loopholes out of their obligations especially when the repair becomes expensive.
#31 of 519
July 2009 sales by bwilson4web
Aug 03, 2009 (8:07 pm)
Reply
July 2009 sales are in:
 
24,295 Toyota hybrids, up 19.3%
VW all sales, 20,590, up 0.7%, and 6,320 diesels
Ford sales are up 1.6%
 
Prius is in the top 10 model sales for July. The free market whispered in July, "Prius," which thundered through the halls of VW. Even Ford got a taste thanks to their hybrids.

Messages Page 4 of 53
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
53
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement