Sign In Join 



Article Comments - 2009 Mazda 6 First Drive and Full Test

229 messages,  Last post on Aug 25, 2008 at 6:33 AM

You are in the Mazda6 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDA6, Sedan

First Drive: 2009 Mazda 6 - First Impressions: With most of its major flaws fixed, the 2009 Mazda 6 is easily one of the most impressive sedans in the midsize class. (more)
 
Full Test: 2009 Mazda 6 s Grand Touring - Bottom Line: Manages to keep some of the zoom-zoom athleticism despite pandering to the Accord/Camry market.(more)


Messages Page 19 of 23
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#180 of 229
Re: Just Needs Better Tires [m6user]...Reply 2 [blackadder5639] [m6user] [b by moparbad
Aug 18, 2008 (10:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (Aug 18, 2008 8:37 am)

Interview with Don Romano
 
Different strokes for different folks! That's really the best way to put it.
 
Yes, Mazda has been different strokes for different folks, and Mazda is admittedly proud they are not "another mainstream company".
 
However, I totally get the impression that Mazda did try to emulate Camry/Accord/Altima with the new 6 despite Mazda stating they are targeting the enthusiast. The interior is nicer, the styling is quite nice, the handling is just not as improved as the rest of the car is.
#181 of 229
Re: Just Needs Better Tires [m6user]...Reply 2 [blackadder5639] [m6user] [blackadder5639] [m6user] by blackadder5639
Aug 18, 2008 (10:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: m6user (Aug 18, 2008 7:58 am)

"Anyway, one of my main points is that just don't take Edmunds review as gospel."
 
Point taken. I'll wait for other reviews and my own test drive.
 
As far as the packages go, while Mazda's are better than Nissan's outrageous packages, I can understand why a person would complain about Mazda:
 
- For the 2009 Mazda 6 GT, a person who likes the premium stereo also has to go for the sunroof! That's unfair, as sunroofs and stereos are not related in function at all......I like the premium stereo but NOT the sunroof.
- A person who opts for the Touring trim cannot get a few of the GT options. He/she basically has to pay for one HUGE package that vitually converts the Touring to the GT! That is really ridiculous.
 
Honestly, I wish manufacturers would allow users to choose the features they want......they could make a reasonable demand, like "if you opt to choose the individual options, you have to factory-order the car....that could take one to two months". But lumping options into huge packages is just not acceptable IMO....small packages with a few features are okay.
 
Some of the guys here have commented on the interior of the 2009 Mazda 6. Man, it's gorgeous! The one I saw at the dealership had black dash and floors and brown seats. It is the most beautiful interior I've ever seen in a non-luxury car...wow!
#182 of 229
Re: Just Needs Better Tires [m6user]...Reply 2 [blackadder5639] [m6user] [blackadder5639] [m6user] [blackadder5639] by m6user
Aug 18, 2008 (2:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: blackadder5639 (Aug 18, 2008 10:48 am)

Even though I think Mazda is not as bad as Nissan, I agree with you that it sucks to have to order a sunroof(IMO a real seldom used moneywaster) to get a nice sound system. If you are like me and keep a car for quite awhile you might consider upgrading with an aftermarket system. I've read several comments that the Mazda Bose system isn't all that great anyway but I have no personal experience with it.
 
Years back people used to order from the factory more and options were almost line by line. I mean you could order each and every option individually. It was almost the exception buy a car "made for someone else" off the lot. I think the Japanese had a hand in turning the way cars are bought now....mostly off lot vs ordering. This was probably because the lead time from order here in the US to manufacturing plant in Japan and then the shipping time was just too long for any customer to wait. So they looked at the way most people optioned the cars out and just made them that way. They seem to have done a pretty good job of getting it right.
 
The the Big Three(actually the Big Four then as American motors was still in business well after the Asian invasion) started emulating them to some degree. However, pull up a Ford F-150 and you'll still see individual options lists several pages long and I'm not sure I would want to go through that routine either. There is some economy for both the manufacturer and the customer in packaging options. For sure there is probably more profit for the manufacturer too!
#183 of 229
Re: Just Needs Better Tires [m6user]...Reply 2 [blackadder5639] [m6user] [b by aviboy97
Aug 19, 2008 (5:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: m6user (Aug 18, 2008 2:45 pm)

The older Mazda Bose systems are crappy. The ones in the CX-7, CX-9 and new Mazda6 are really really good.
#184 of 229
Re: Just Needs Better Tires [m6user]...Reply 2 [blackadder5639] [m6user] [b [aviboy97] by mz6greyghost
Aug 19, 2008 (5:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (Aug 19, 2008 5:37 am)

The older Mazda Bose systems are crappy. The ones in the CX-7, CX-9 and new Mazda6 are really really good.
 
Considering I never minded the performance of the current Bose system, this is very good news to me.
#185 of 229
4-cyl Manual Test. by blackadder5639
Aug 19, 2008 (9:59 pm)
Reply
Hi Guys,
 
Check this out: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_0808_2009_mazda6_isport_first_tes- t/index.html
 
MOTOR TREND just tested the 2009 Mazda 6 4-cyl 6-spd manual. They say that gearbox is excellent....and so is the interior apart from the cloth seats. The interior is better than those of the CamCord. As far as sportiness goes, their assessment is pretty much the same as Edmunds': the car is amongst the sportiest in the segment but not the sportiest......they found it to be less sporty than the Passat.
 
Unfortunately, MOTOR TREND don't provide info on things like fuel economy. In all, it seems Edmunds' tests are more thorough.
#186 of 229
Re: 4-cyl Manual Test. [blackadder5639] by moparbad
Aug 20, 2008 (8:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: blackadder5639 (Aug 19, 2008 9:59 pm)

quote Motortrend -So it's not quite as fast as our Passat comparison winner is. It doesn't handle quite as well, the interior isn't quite up to the same level, and the overall build quality isn't quite as strong.-end
 
Quite an endorsement.
#187 of 229
Re: 4-cyl Manual Test. [moparbad] by mz6greyghost
Aug 20, 2008 (9:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Aug 20, 2008 8:40 am)

quote Motortrend -So it's not quite as fast as our Passat comparison winner is. It doesn't handle quite as well, the interior isn't quite up to the same level, and the overall build quality isn't quite as strong.-end
  
Quite an endorsement.

 
I noticed you conveniently omitted the fact that the Passat they tested was $5,000 MORE in MSRP compared to the 6, or the fact that Passat (and VW as a whole) has quality/reliability ratings that are much worse than the 6.
 
As for the interior comments, I've got a '04 6 with 69K miles, with an interior that's in excellent shape (except for a worn drivers seat), with no creaks or rattles. This is compared to a 58K '05 Passat that my neighbor owned. Scratches galore over the dash, the steering wheel worn and faded, a missing grip for the e-brake, and holes in not only the carpeted mats, but the carpeting underneath as well. Half the reason why he ditched the car was because of the constant rattling from the trunk areas and behind the dash (the other half being the constant trips to the repair shop and the high costs of both maintenance and repairs).
 
How's that for an endorsement?
#188 of 229
Re: 4-cyl Manual Test. [mz6greyghost] by aviboy97
Aug 20, 2008 (1:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mz6greyghost (Aug 20, 2008 9:17 am)

My brother had an 01 or 02 VW GTI that always smelled like crayons, and the finish on the steering wheel, power window switches and other trip pieces were pealing when he got rid of it with around 50 or 60K, I can't remember.
 
His current car, 02 Protege ES, has over 100,000 trouble free miles, and still looks new on the inside.
 
I loved those Proteges...they are a great cheap used car if you can find one with low miles!!
#189 of 229
Re: 4-cyl Manual Test. [mz6greyghost] by moparbad
Aug 20, 2008 (1:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mz6greyghost (Aug 20, 2008 9:17 am)

I noticed you conveniently omitted the fact that the Passat they tested was $5,000 MORE in MSRP compared to the 6, or the fact that Passat (and VW as a whole) has quality/reliability ratings that are much worse than the 6.
 
Jetta is the VW I would compare to the Mazda6, not Passat, and Jetta is less than the Mazda6. Passat is midsize, so it is the correct comparison by class, it does have a significant level of standard equipment the Mazda does not, so buyers are obtaining value for the additional cost.
 
The 6 speed tiptronic in the Passat is a fantastic transmission.
 
VW was determined as best brand for resale value for 2008. link Resale Value Top Brand Mazda6 has a poor record of residual value.
 
Right now, Accord or Altima would be my midsize choices, Passat would not make the list. If I wanted to save money, the Fusion would be considered.
 
As far as I'm concerned, all of the "midsize" cars are getting too large.

Messages Page 19 of 23
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement