- #33 of 108
-
Re: 2009? Color Changes[mquillen]
by thegraduate
-
Aug 06, 2008 (7:59 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: mquillen (Aug 06, 2008 5:37 am)
And those color changes are:
New colors: Crystal Black Pearl (black or ivory interior), Alabaster Silver Metallic (black or gray interior) and Urban Titanium Metallic (black or ivory interior)
Discontinued Colors: Nighthawk Black Pearl, Whistler Silver Metallic
|
- #34 of 108
-
2010 CR-V ?
by wstevec
-
Aug 06, 2008 (10:46 am)
-
|
|
I wounder since such small changes are being made and the '09 will be on sale in mid-August if we might see the 2010 as a re-design by spring of '09 like some other manufacuters do when they have a re-design? Personally, I would love to see another 30 or 40 ponies under the hood.
|
- #35 of 108
-
Re: 2010 CR-V ? [wstevec]
by phisher
-
Aug 07, 2008 (9:19 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: wstevec (Aug 06, 2008 10:46 am)
With gas prices being what they are I can't imagine Honda increasing the HP if it decreases the gas millage. I wouldn't be surprised to see a decrease in HP to increase MPG on some models.
|
- #36 of 108
-
Re: 2010 CR-V ? [phisher]
by wstevec
-
Aug 07, 2008 (11:02 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: phisher (Aug 07, 2008 9:19 am)
Acutually BMW increased both gas milage and HP (from about 184 to 215) when they re-designed the 3 Series in 2006 which I currently have. I would be just a little nervous with the current 166 HP in the CR-V when I am trying to get on the Interstate, especially with some trucker coming up on me. I just think a 200 HP engine like the new VW SUV has would be the perfect combination of gas milage and power.
|
- #37 of 108
-
Re: 2010 CR-V ? [wstevec]
by phisher
-
Aug 07, 2008 (11:39 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: wstevec (Aug 07, 2008 11:02 am)
It may well be but look at the MPG on the VW. Honda also boosted HP and kept the same MPG or improved it. Having driven a CRV for a while I can say the 166 HP is more than sufficient to get up to highway speed.
|
- #38 of 108
-
Re: 2010 CR-V ? [wstevec]
by thegraduate
-
Aug 12, 2008 (7:48 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: wstevec (Aug 06, 2008 10:46 am)
You won't see a redesign of the CR-V anytime soon since the current model debuted only 2 years ago. A refresh, yes. Nothing groundbreaking in the way of redesign usually comes at the midlife refresh.
|
- #39 of 108
-
Re: 2010 CR-V ? [phisher]
by thegraduate
-
Aug 12, 2008 (7:52 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: phisher (Aug 07, 2008 11:39 am)
I drive a '96 Accord with a worse weight/power ratio than the CR-V and I've never had a problem merging.
The CR-V has never been quick (how about the first 126 hp 4-speed model!). If you can hit 60 in under 10 seconds, you're fine. In fact, the 4-cyl CR-V actually out-accelerates the 3.0L 200hp Escape V6, because of the CR-V's more flexible engine and better gear ratios.
|
- #40 of 108
-
Re: 2010 CR-V ? [phisher]
by wstevec
-
Aug 12, 2008 (9:09 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: phisher (Aug 07, 2008 11:39 am)
Thanks Phisher, I was somewhat concerned about the acceleration. I guess the best thing to do will be to try one out myself.
|
- #42 of 108
-
Re: TPMS [sleake1]
by mtwalit
-
Aug 12, 2008 (12:11 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: sleake1 (Jul 30, 2008 7:04 am)
this happened to me every 2 weeks and I kept needing to have the tires inflated.Went to the dealer twice.Not sure what they did (or didn't do ) the first time but the second time there was a nail in one of the tires and I haven't had a problem since. Now I've driven for months and no TP light comes on and tires haven't needed air. I can't believe I had a tire with a nail in it the whole time and I wonder if the gauge was adjusted somehow at the dealer.
Keep taking it back till it's fixed. I know others had this problem also (sans nail)
|