You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
BMW M/M3/M6
Article Comments - 2002 BMW M3 vs. 2008 BMW 135i vs. 2008 BMW 335i

16 messages, Last post on Jul 01, 2008 at 6:06 PM
You are in the BMW M/M3/M6 Forum. Your Host is claires
Comparison Test: 2002 BMW M3 vs. 2008 BMW 135i vs. 2008 BMW 335i - As we've already seen in plenty of comparison tests, the 2008 BMW 335i offers levels of refinement, comfort and performance unmatched by any coupe in its segment — but it comes with a price. (more)
|
Replying to: KarenS (Apr 29, 2008 9:01 am) The M3 is the more focused of the two with a suspension which works well for the occasional track day but rides on the firm side for my daily driving which equates to about 20k miles of freeway a year. The M3 is raw by comparison and the high strung 3.2 liter six must be spun to produce the thrust of the N54. The 335i on the other hand can be both relaxed and very fast. The N54 offers a huge plateau of torque from as low as 1400 RPM which makes freeway passes little more than an afterthought without requiring a downshift. The 335i sport seats are far more comfortable and just as supportive as those found in the E46 M3. Even with the crummy RFT tires the 335i offers a much more comfortable ride. I miss my M3s and the limited slip dif on CCA track days but for the other 99% of my driving the M3 is no match for my 335. And for those that take it to the track a set of track wheels with a square setup and r-comps will dramatically improve the 335. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: KarenS (Apr 29, 2008 9:01 am) Look at the option packages chosen. The 135i has the sport package with the summer performance tires and better suspension. The M3 is obviously equipped with performance tires and a taut suspension. The 335i was NOT equipped with the sport package and instead comes with skinnier ALL SEASON tires. I don't think anyone should be surprised that it would be slower on the track. I surmise if you got the sport package on the 335i, the wider summer performance tires would erase all performance deficiencies.
|
|
|
Replying to: leftcoastman (May 08, 2008 7:51 pm) I do think these cars are getting too fat and heavy. The 135i weighs considerably more than a Porshe Cayman. And a coupe should not have a pillar between front and rear side windows. The E90 coupe looks like a considerably bigger car than the sedan. Overall, I'd like to see a taller glass areas, no pillar between front and rear side windows, less bulk (crashworthiness willing), availability of quality cloth seats (like the cars sold in Europe), 2,500 lb curb weight.
|
|
|
Replying to: nkeen (Jun 28, 2008 8:51 am) Crashworthiness also has raised beltlines, making a taller glass area that much harder to pull off in a coupe. 2500 lb curb weights are gone forever. |
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 28, 2008 11:02 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: nkeen (Jun 28, 2008 6:17 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 28, 2008 11:02 am) Well, there is the current-gen MB CLK...
|
|
|
Replying to: lovemyclk (Jun 30, 2008 12:00 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 30, 2008 12:47 pm) BMW 335 Coupe is a splendid piece as performance coupes go, but they do have a B-pillar. Can live with it given the performance from the TT I6 and good chassis balance. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
BMW M/M3/M6
Article Comments - 2002 BMW M3 vs. 2008 BMW 135i vs. 2008 BMW 335i
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 BMW 1 Series
2009 BMW M3
2009 BMW 3 Series



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats