Sign In Join 



Good Styling

392 messages,  Last post on Feb 25, 2009 at 8:29 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Car Comparisons


Messages Page 2 of 40
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
40
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#10 of 392
fender skirts? by steve_ HOST
Apr 25, 2008 (9:09 am)
Reply
Maybe it's from too many hours spent watching The Jetsons, but the biggest style detractor to me on cars in general are the wheels and tires. I don't care how much chrome you slap on them, the wheels always seem to be an afterthought and the car style never manages to compensate very well for them.
 
Some makes do try to make them a big styling cue while others try to hide them but they are always there, usually ruining the lines.
 
I can't say I've seen many fender skirts that help either.
#11 of 392
Re: fender skirts? [steve_] by andre1969
Apr 25, 2008 (11:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Apr 25, 2008 9:09 am)

I had a '69 Bonneville with fender skirts, and they just made that car look fat. I eventually took them off, and even though it gave the car a bit of an unfinished look around the rear wheel opening, I thought on the whole the car looked a whole lot better.
 
Now that I think about it, I had a '67 Newport with skirts, but they sort of blended in with the bodyside creases. That Newport was also more slab-sided, maybe even a bit concave, whereas the Bonneville was more fuselaged.
 
One styling cue that I tend to pay attention to with cars is where the C-pillar falls, in relation to the rear wheel opening. If the C-pillar is too far back, IMO it often makes the car look ungainly, like the roof is too big for the body. Some cars with rakish rooflines can sort of get away with it, but with more upright cars, I think it's harder to do.
#12 of 392
Re: fender skirts? [andre1969] by fezo
Apr 25, 2008 (12:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Apr 25, 2008 11:55 am)

I think in general anything added to the car afterward tends to do nothing to help the appearance, be it wacky wheels, big spoilers, fake portholes..... Leave the basic design alone.
 
The Germans seem to have as good a handle as anyone as to what makes a good looking car. Audis tend to look great. BMWs, Porsche, even VW. For the most part the Japanese aren't bad but they have a tendency to blend in with one another.
 
Amongst the Americans GM and Ford are improving their act. I don't know that the chrome bars need to be on all Fords but they work on the Fusion which is pretty attractive. Saturn has the idea. I never thought I'd say that. Newer Buick designs are really stepping up.
#13 of 392
The good, the bad and.... by andys120
Apr 25, 2008 (1:59 pm)
Reply
Good:
 
-Any Audi except the Q7
-Bentley GT & sedan
-BMW 3 Series, 7 Series
-Mercedes E Class and C Class
-Ford Fusion
-Ford Mustang, esp. Bullitt coupe
-Dodge Charger (exc. interior)
-Ferrari F430 and 599GTB
-Mini Cooper
-Infiniti G35/G37, M35/45
-Nissan Altima
-Mitsu Lancer/EVO
-Porsche Cayman, 911, Boxster
-Pontiac G8, Solstice
-Mazda Miata, 3, 6 CX-7
-Jag XK
-Maserati GT, QP
 
-Bad
 
-Audi Q7
-Saab 9-5
-BMW 6-Series
-Nissan Maxima, Armada
-Scion xB
-Lincoln Navi
-Jaguar XF (esp headlights)
Merc GM / Ford CV
Dodge Challenger
 
-Ugly
 
-Chrysler Sebring
-Honda CR-V
-Lincoln TC
-BMW 5 Series
-BMW Z4 esp coupe.
-Porsche Cayenne
-Roll-Royce Phantom (looks like a Kenworth in front!)
 
I left off a lot of cars that look okay enough but aren't particularly good, bad or ugly, including some (like the Corvette) I might conceivably buy
#14 of 392
Re: The good, the bad and.... [andys120] by fezo
Apr 25, 2008 (2:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Apr 25, 2008 1:59 pm)

Good list. You forgot how beautiful a 99 Celica convertible is......
 
BMW has traditionally had beautiful cars but the current 5 and 6 series leave you scratching your head.
 
It would figure that the only was Honda got onto any list was with the redesign of the CRV. The new one is growing on me a little but that only means it moved up to "I don't turn the other way when I see one coming" class.
 
Nissan has been slowly destroying the Maxima design since it did the refresh in, what, 1991? The 89 Maxima was perfect. Still looks good now.
 
I have Hondas and Toyotas. Their design does not cause great emotion either way.
 
Passed a Cayman last weekend. Serious lust.
#15 of 392
Re: The good, the bad and.... [fezo] by andys120
Apr 25, 2008 (2:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Apr 25, 2008 2:46 pm)

You forgot how beautiful a 99 Celica convertible is......
 
I sure like this one, note license plate.
#16 of 392
Re: I don't claim [nippononly] by writer
Apr 25, 2008 (11:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Apr 24, 2008 6:46 pm)

I liked the original Matrix as soon as I saw it and I still like it. I think it has proven an enduring design.
 
I do not find the new Matrix as appealing. Maybe it will grow on me.
 
I did not like the recessed grill on the original Vibe. When they changed the grill it made a big improvement. I have not had a good look at the new Vibe yet.
#17 of 392
Dodge by writer
Apr 25, 2008 (11:37 pm)
Reply
I like the new Grand Caravan.
 
I do not like the Calibre. It reminds me of an old Citroen.
 
I have not decided about the Avenger. I think it might grow on me.
 
The pre-MB Chrysler cars were much better than what came after.
#18 of 392
Re: Dodge [writer] by andys120
Apr 26, 2008 (3:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: writer (Apr 25, 2008 11:37 pm)

The new Caravan is a bit of a throwback isn't it? By squaring off the lines, they came up with a design that looks like the original 1980's Caravan.
 
The Calibre is another car that looks like a truck. The styling might be the best thing about it, apparently it's a poor car.
 
The Avenger/Sebring twins are a real mess with discordant lines and poor proportions, the Dodge comes off a little better because it doesn't have the gimmicky ridges on the hood.
 
I like the second Gen of Viper styling much better than the unrestrained voluptuousness of the early design.
 
The Charger is a great looking car, one of the best current four door sedans, especially in a dark color which gives it an air of subtle menace. Like a lot of the cars of the D-C era it falls apart inside (metaphorically that is). The interior, like that of the 300, is bland and cheap looking.
#19 of 392
Re: Dodge [andys120] by gsemike
Apr 26, 2008 (6:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Apr 26, 2008 3:47 am)

look at a calibur dead on from the rear. it looks like the spent about 10 minutes designing it. the car has some decent touches but overall is sub-par

Messages Page 2 of 40
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
40
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement