Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views Good Styling
392 messages, Last post on Feb 25, 2009 at 8:29 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: fintail (Apr 24, 2008 6:08 pm) Would agree. The 90-93 4-door Accord is probably the best ever designed Accord. We had 86, 95 and 98 4-door Accords. The 94-97 series was ungainly. The 98 was clean but too plain-Jane. |
|
|
There was a time when General Motors was producing styling that rivaled the world's best, the Bill Mitchell era during the 1960s was perhaps GM Design's finest era and this is my candidate for the best looking Buick ever-made> 1966 Buick Riviera Gran Sport >  Notice how restrained the use of chrome and other details is, this car is all about form and proportion. I think it's even better than the '63-'65 Rivs. Sadly it only took a couple of years to screw it up completely: link
|
|
|
That 66 looks a little bulbous in front. I'll take a Riv from the 63-65 vintage. I suggest that the 58 Buick Roadmaster is the worst Buick styling ever and probably in the top 10 all time ugliest American cars.
|
|
|
Replying to: xrunner2 (Feb 21, 2009 11:54 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: fezo (Feb 21, 2009 12:35 pm) Think that the 57 Chev black hardtop has survived the test of time of good styling for that era.
|
|
|
Replying to: andys120 (Feb 21, 2009 7:48 am) The only Riv that really grosses me out is the 1970 model. They took a car that had been clean, sporty, even futuristic looking, and suddenly made it look fat and old. It looked like a bloated Skylark. Many of them had fender skirts, but even without the skirts, the wheel openings in back were smaller than the '66-69. They also had exposed headlights that seemed mounted too far too the edges, and an awkward sculpting on the side with a dip that seemed to recall the 1950's, but it all contributed to making the car look fat and dowdy. For the most part, the 1970's saw styling take a nosedive, but I think in the case of the Riv, the Boattail 1971 was actually an improvement on the 1970! While it was wild, flambuoyant, and pimpy, at least it still managed to return a youthful, sporty flair to the nameplate...until it got watered down again around 1974. 
|
|
|
Replying to: fezo (Feb 21, 2009 12:35 pm) I think the 1958 Plymouths, Dodges, and DeSoto Firesweeps (more Dodge than a "real" DeSoto) actually looked better than their 1957 counterparts! I think I'd call the 1958 Oldsmobile the "most fallen" car that year, for lack of a better term. Basically, comparing it to its 1957 counterpart, it saw the biggest drop in style. I think the '58 Buick is pretty bad, too. But I think the '58 Olds looks worse, while I think a '57 Olds looks better than a '57 Buick, so the Olds "fell" further...if that makes sense! |
|
|
Replying to: xrunner2 (Feb 21, 2009 12:54 pm) teen-age Opie that had Harrison Ford in a 57 Chev No disagreement about the '58 Chevy being ugly. It's funny how every discussion about 50s and 60s styling always comes down to what the hell happened in 1958. Here's a still from American Graffitti showing "Toad" next to "Steve Boland's" '58 Chevrolet Impala >  . FWIW, the Harrison Ford car in that movie was a '55, not a '57 as can be seen in the scene where he rolls it> 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: andys120 (Feb 21, 2009 1:42 pm) link title
|
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Feb 21, 2009 1:48 pm) I think even the 4-door sedan version of the '58 Chevy is good looking, although I think the 2-door sedan is a bit awkward. I liked the 4-door hardtop as well, although I guess it was a bit awkward the way they had to put that piece of spacer trim at the back of the door, to allow the window to roll down.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views Good Styling
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
