Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views Good Styling
392 messages, Last post on Feb 25, 2009 at 8:29 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: andys120 (Dec 17, 2008 7:01 am) Look at that 507, no creases for the sake of creases 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Dec 17, 2008 8:53 am) |
|
|
Replying to: 62vetteefp (Dec 17, 2008 9:15 am)  Prominent side creases have been elements of BMW design since the 1950s.
|
|
|
Replying to: andys120 (Dec 17, 2008 9:54 am) On some cars there's a crease that comes off the top of the front wheel opening and carries forward to the front of the car. I always liked this look. In fact, it was one of the things that attracted me to the '57-58 DeSoto and Chrysler. I also like it on the '61-62 Cadillac and '59 Mercury. Ford did it as well in '57-59, Studebaker did it a few years, and countless others, I'm sure. |
|
|
Replying to: 62vetteefp (Dec 17, 2008 9:15 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Dec 17, 2008 10:25 am)  I like it, mind you, but it's styling, not function. I like the next Z4 from the pics too. Didn't much care for the prior one. I liked the Z3 a lot; neighbor next door had one for a while. I tend to like "chick" cars - minivans, Miatas....
|
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Dec 17, 2008 1:01 pm) The new Z4 looks ok, but it looks alot like the previous Z4 to me, with the flame surfacing toned down just a little. |
|
|
|
| The Z3 was much better-looking than the Z4 has been. | |
somewhat, the Z3 was certainly better looking than the current Z4 but it doesn't compare to the new Z4 (E89) IMO.
|
|
|
Replying to: andys120 (Dec 18, 2008 8:24 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views Good Styling
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
