Sign In Join 



Good Styling

392 messages,  Last post on Feb 25, 2009 at 8:29 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Car Comparisons


Messages Page 35 of 40
1
...
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
...
40
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#337 of 392
Re: LOL! [fintail] by nippononly
Oct 06, 2008 (3:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Oct 06, 2008 1:17 pm)

I prefer "cute" to "angry". Maybe they got a group of angry people in their study!
 
I prefer clean and well-proportioned to either cute or angry. And in general I don't focus on the looks of a car much at all. The specs and the way it drives are more important to me than the looks.
#338 of 392
Re: LOL! [nippononly] by fintail
Oct 06, 2008 (4:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Oct 06, 2008 3:32 pm)

I am sure there's some kind of mumbo-jumbo study that links cars with angry "eyes" to angry people.
 
I will admit styling does matter to me. I need a balanced original design, something clean and not gimmicky. Specs and driving matter a lot too, but if a car hurts my eyes, that can break the deal. Kind of like with the new Acura TL....specs etc look fantastic, but it's sure ugly to me, even having a few "what the hell is that?!" design cues. Maybe it's because I am mildly obsessive about keeping my car clean, so I get to see every little detail a lot.
#339 of 392
Re: LOL! [texases] by fintail
Oct 06, 2008 (4:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: texases (Oct 06, 2008 3:03 pm)

Agreed. And it is indeed possible to use too much chrome.
#340 of 392
Re: LOL! [nippononly] by andre1969
Oct 07, 2008 (4:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Oct 06, 2008 3:32 pm)

I prefer "cute" to "angry". Maybe they got a group of angry people in their study!
 
I guess I prefer something in the middle. "Cute" just isn't my thing. But cars with that "angry" look just end up going so over the top that they look bufoonish. I dunno what other adjectives there are though. "Handsome", maybe?
 
I think a lot of old musclecars and such could look "tough", without having to resort to "angry".
#341 of 392
Re: LOL! [andre1969] by andys120
Oct 07, 2008 (4:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Oct 07, 2008 4:30 am)

I think a lot of old musclecars and such could look "tough", without having to resort to "angry".
 
I agree, the best looking of the musclecars were subtle in their styling. You had to look closely to tell that you weren't looking at a garden variety LeMans or Malibu.
 
'64 Pontiac LeMans>

 
'64 Pontiac GTO>
#342 of 392
Re: LOL! [andys120] by andre1969
Oct 07, 2008 (5:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Oct 07, 2008 4:53 am)

I think in the case of the '64 Pontiacs, even the Tempest has a tough look about it, so that was a good basis for the GTO. In '65 though, I thought the whole package just looked too "pretty" to be tough. But for '66-67 they were able to balance it out to be "tough" yet "pretty", if that makes sense.
#343 of 392
4 Door Porsche> by andys120
Nov 23, 2008 (7:06 pm)
Reply
Porsche AG has released the first official photos of the controversial Panamera 4-door sport sedan, thankfully they look a lot better than the hideous spy-shots and sketches that have been floating around the web for months>
 

 
I'll reserve judgment til I see one but it sure looks better than the Cayenne.
#344 of 392
Re: 4 Door Porsche> [andys120] by andre1969
Nov 24, 2008 (7:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Nov 23, 2008 7:06 pm)

I think the car's actually reasonably attractive...but it's not what a Porsche should be, IMO. But I guess if Porsche can have an SUV, a sedan's not so bad. So when's the pickup truck version making its debut?
#345 of 392
Re: 4 Door Porsche> [andys120] by texases
Nov 24, 2008 (8:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Nov 23, 2008 7:06 pm)

From that angle it looks ok, but I don't like the profile towards the rear (edit: makes me think of what somebody would come up with when supplied with a 911, a sawzall, and instructions to 'make it a 4-door' :
#346 of 392
Re: 4 Door Porsche> [andre1969] by nippononly
Nov 24, 2008 (12:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 24, 2008 7:54 am)

LOL! Just how would a Cayenne SUT look anyway? My guess is, hideous no matter what creative things one might try....
 
From the side view that Panamera looks like it should have a hatchback in the rear, not a trunk lid. Does it in fact have a hatchback? Either way it looks like the front view is its best one.

Messages Page 35 of 40
1
...
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
...
40
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement