Article Comments - 2009 Ford Flex First Look / First Drive / Full Test

66 messages, Last post on Feb 26, 2009 at 6:29 PM

You are in the Ford Flex Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Ford Flex, Wagon

First Look: 2009 Ford Flex - The 2009 Ford Flex might be another crossover, but at least it's not boring. (more)

First Drive: 2009 Ford Flex - First Impressions: If you like the look of the Flex, there's nothing in the way that it functions that should prevent you from getting it. (more)

Full Test: 2009 Ford Flex Limited AWD - Bottom Line: As everyday transportation, it's the best, most comfortable Ford you can buy. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 2 of 7: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; Prev; Next; Last

#9 of 66 Another Edsel? by larym Apr 26, 2008 (6:24 am)
Good looking car, but high price and low fuel economy in poor financial time for many households. Not what most people are looking for right now. Replies to this message: winemaker23 (Apr 28, 2008 6:38 am) rgurta (Aug 26, 2008 7:04 am)
#10 of 66 Re: Another Edsel? [larym] by winemaker23 Apr 28, 2008 (6:38 am)
Replying to: larym (Apr 26, 2008 6:24 am) The types of people needing this type of auto (such as myself), are those with multiple children or extended families and who cannot afford to shell out high dollars for such a vehicle just to look a little trendy.... Millions of minivan drivers don't do so for the look of them, that's for sure! And they certainly don't drive minivans for the fuel economy either. I think FORD will miss the mark with this one unless they drop the price. If they do drop the price, they could really capture a larger portion of that market segment, as it is an interesting alternative to the minivan. Or offer a HYBRID option to the vehicle. I'd consider one, but not at the current estimated price!
#11 of 66 Because it's different by mrpepsi Apr 28, 2008 (2:35 pm)
I think it will end up being very popular. Not 100,000 sales popular, but I feel it will get a good share. I also think it will bring quite a few people down from a full sized SUV. Ford might not like losing Expedition sales, but I bet they won't mind gaining Tahoe buyers. With gas where it is, I think people will choose a vehicle that looks hip, but get better gas milleage. I think moms of the skateboarding croud will get pressured by the kids to buy such a different looking vehicle. Replies to this message: paisan (May 01, 2008 4:05 pm) bobw3 (May 11, 2008 8:14 am) fezo (May 13, 2008 4:07 pm) and 2 more... burlapp (Jun 15, 2008 9:05 pm) rcf8000 (Jun 16, 2008 5:53 am) icescort (Aug 22, 2008 12:51 pm) coldcranker (Aug 23, 2008 9:32 am) cccompson (Aug 24, 2008 3:43 pm) and 1 more...
#12 of 66 Like a coffin! by johnzocco Apr 30, 2008 (7:55 pm)
Yeah, the reviewer is right, this thing looks like a huge coffin, and to me, unless you're into the macabre, is not a compliment. This wagon in my opinion is not going to do well. It will be a sales disaster. Ford should concentrate more on fuel efficient vehicles, like Toyota and Honda. Gas in California is almost $4.00/gallon. Who is going to buy this? Sorry, but it's ugly, too expensive and gets poor mileage. For those who really need a "large" SUV, look at the Toyota Highlander or Honda Pilot. They're relatively roomy and fuel efficient, and a whole lot more practical. The Ford Flex, like a coffin, will get buried like one.
#13 of 66 Re: Because it's different [mrpepsi] by paisan May 01, 2008 (4:05 pm)
Replying to: mrpepsi (Apr 28, 2008 2:35 pm) I think moms of the skateboarding croud will get pressured by the kids to buy such a different looking vehicle. This is part of the problem with this country today... Why would the kids dictate what the parents drive? The parents are SUPPOSED to be the ones in charge, not the kids. I guess that's just how messed up our society has become. -mike Replies to this message: bobw3 (May 11, 2008 8:14 am) fezo (May 13, 2008 4:07 pm) fezo (May 13, 2008 5:55 pm) bobw3 (May 15, 2008 7:26 am)
#14 of 66 Re: Because it's different [paisan] by bobw3 May 11, 2008 (8:14 am)
Replying to: paisan (May 01, 2008 4:05 pm) If I have the choices between three different vehicles for example and my kids like one over another, then why not get the ones the kids like, especially if they're all equal to me. Replies to this message: fezo (May 13, 2008 4:07 pm) fezo (May 13, 2008 5:55 pm) bobw3 (May 15, 2008 7:26 am)
#15 of 66 Re: Because it's different [bobw3] by fezo May 13, 2008 (4:07 pm)
Replying to: bobw3 (May 11, 2008 8:14 am) I like all sorts of things about this, er, vehicle. Price, however, is not one of them. I think it's priced too high for what it is. Replies to this message: fezo (May 13, 2008 5:55 pm) bobw3 (May 15, 2008 7:26 am)
#16 of 66 Re: Because it's different [fezo] by fezo May 13, 2008 (5:55 pm)
Replying to: fezo (May 13, 2008 4:07 pm) I should mention that one of the things I really thought showed attention to detail is that instrument cluster. It's really attractive.
#17 of 66 Re: Because it's different [fezo] by bobw3 May 15, 2008 (7:26 am)
Replying to: fezo (May 13, 2008 4:07 pm) I'm sure after they arrive at the dealer lots and then sit around for 6 months, the deals and incentives will begin. As far as price goes, I'd say they should be comparable to an Acadia, Outlook, Mazda CX-9, or any of the other large CUVs out there.
#18 of 66 Honda Pilot/Toyota Highlander MPGS by mschmal Jun 06, 2008 (1:25 pm)
Pilot: Fuel Tank Capacity: 21 gal.; EPA Mileage Estimates: 17 mpg / 23 mpg; Range in Miles: 357 mi. / 483 mi Highlander: Fuel Tank Capacity: 19.2 gal.; EPA Mileage Estimates: 17 mpg / 23 mpg; Range in Miles: 326.4 mi. / 441.6 mi. Flex according to my order guide has EPA Mileage Estimate of 17 mpg / 24 mpg. SO I guess this is another one of those magical moments when less (Pilot/Highlander at 23 mpg) is more. OH and the Flex has 155 cubic feet of interior volume.