Article Comments - 2008 BMW X6 First Drive and Full Test

18 messages, Last post on Mar 27, 2009 at 5:05 PM

You are in the BMW X6 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? BMW X6, SUV

First Drive: 2008 BMW X6 xDrive 50i - First Impressions: A more powerful, slightly more nimble version of BMW's already fast and agile X5. Only worth the extra $8 grand if you really like the styling.(more)

Full Test: 2008 BMW X6 xDrive35i -Bottom Line: An SUV built to look fast and agile, the BMW X6 comes through with the performance to back it up. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 2 of 2: 1; 2; Prev; Next; Last

#9 of 18 Re: Target Buyer by corlt1 May 18, 2008 (8:36 am)
Replying to: bmlexus (May 06, 2008 10:13 pm) I rented an Infiniti FX35 and loved the handling and ride, but wanted more room in the cargo area. The X6 appears to be marketed against the FX and has about the same dimensions. The FX50 is out with 390 hp, but the only noticable changes are the front end and the interior, which is somewhat disappointing as the FX design is getting old. That said, the X6's design is fresh and appears to be targeted towards the empty nest market that wants handling and speed, with the occasional cargo capacity and back seat. Replies to this message: anon3 (May 21, 2008 1:50 pm)
#10 of 18 Re: Target Buyer [corlt1] by anon3 May 21, 2008 (1:50 pm)
Replying to: corlt1 (May 18, 2008 8:36 am) I agree. The closest competitor to the X6 is the new FX. But I would say that Infiniti markets against BMW, not the other way around, since BMW has been the benchmark for so long. It's interesting that the FX50's normally aspirate engine with 390hp and 369 lb ft of torque has published 0 - 60 numbers that are equal to or better than the X6 turbo 8 with 400 hp and 450 lb ft of torque (depending on who did the test.) I'll have to research it, but maybe the FX is lighter. Maybe these are just preliminary numbers and the actual performance of the turbo 8 will be better. BMW traditionally is conservative on its published performance numbers by about .3 seconds because they publish average numbers and not the best possible numbers. In any case, it doesn't appear that the turbo 8 X6 will have a significant performance advantage over the FX50. And with Infiniti matching or beating BMW handling in other models (like the M45), it may be a little hard to justify the extra $10k for a comparably equipped 8 cyl. X6.
#11 of 18 Full Test available! by KarenS HOST Jun 11, 2008 (9:27 am)
Full Test: 2008 BMW X6 xDrive35i
#12 of 18 Re: What's the point of the X6 [bmlexus] by bodble2 Jun 23, 2008 (11:45 pm)
Replying to: bmlexus (May 06, 2008 10:13 pm) The target market for the X6 obviously has utility well down the list of priorities. And in person, the X6 is quite striking. But since it is designed to only hold 4 people, instead of having it bigger and heavier than the X5, if they had made it 2 inches narrower and shorter, and 200 - 300 lbs lighter, than the X5, then they might have hit a niche. Then, the 300hp twin turbo could do some damage, and the vehicle would be that much more nimble. Right now, I look at the bulk of the thing, the 4-person capacity and smallish cargo area, and wonder why, pray tell, do they think they need to make it that big? Is there some sort of pissing contest to see who can make the biggest, baddest-looking SUV, or SAV? Replies to this message: bmlexus (Jul 12, 2008 3:09 pm)
#13 of 18 Re: What's the point of the X6 [bodble2] by bmlexus Jul 12, 2008 (3:09 pm)
Replying to: bodble2 (Jun 23, 2008 11:45 pm) Is there some sort of pissing contest to see who can make the biggest, baddest-looking SUV, or SAV? LOL its possible. porsche will be next within 2 years to show its next gen cayenne.
#14 of 18 Article... by bhw Jul 15, 2008 (11:54 pm)
Replying to: pat911 (Apr 09, 2008 5:14 pm) I think Hellwig should re-read his own article. How does the X6 get by on looks alone? He even says, "'On the skid pad, the X6 generates a 0.87g...a better number than three out of the four V8 Sport Sedans we compared last month.' 'The X6 is equally fast through the slalom, posting a best run of 65.3 mph...plenty of grip combined with a well-sorted suspension and responsive steering allows the X6 to transition quickly and push right to the limit.' 'Stopping power is another area where the X6 manages its weight well...There are sports cars that take 10 feet longer to accomplish the same feat.'" It's almost as if he forget which car he tested. The X6 creates a new standard and raises the bar for SUV expectations. Replies to this message: bmlexus (Jul 26, 2008 1:27 am)
#15 of 18 Re: Article... [bhw] by bmlexus Jul 26, 2008 (1:27 am)
Replying to: bhw (Jul 15, 2008 11:54 pm) Couldn't agree more The X6 is a beauty, Well not to everyone, Some people will always say its heavy can't compare to a sedan ugly will be a flop useless etc etc... As for me I would always choose the X6 rather than a large or sports sedan. X6 is unique unbelievable car like handling only cayenne has similar abilities. The only doubt I have bmws don't have such good reliability or electronics history. Those turbo lags in the engine
#16 of 18 bigger than x5? by gardis Jan 29, 2009 (9:37 am)
I'm amazed that you guys think the X6 is larger than the X5?? I've seen them at my dealer in Fairfield County CT, and that car looks bigger than the X3, but slightly smaller than the X5. How could it possibly weight 5,000 PDS??? Anyone that can afford an $80,000 car -- more power to you guys. It's the epitome of only one thing: ostentation. Period. Simple as that, and I'm a devoted BMW owner. People look at someone driving that vehicle, and say, how much money does he make, in a way they don't comment on the 5 series, or really any other BMW model. My two cents. Gardis CT Replies to this message: achonko (Mar 02, 2009 8:06 am) anon3 (Mar 27, 2009 5:05 pm)
#17 of 18 Re: bigger than x5? [gardis] by achonko Mar 02, 2009 (8:06 am)
Replying to: gardis (Jan 29, 2009 9:37 am) Gardis, Is the Porsche Cayenne GTS an epitome of ostentatiousness, or the Range Rover Sports or HSE? These vehicles cost an average of $10k more than the X6.
#18 of 18 Re: bigger than x5? [gardis] by anon3 Mar 27, 2009 (5:05 pm)
Replying to: gardis (Jan 29, 2009 9:37 am) "It's the epitome of only one thing: ostentation. Period. Simple as that, and I'm a devoted BMW owner. People look at someone driving that vehicle, and say, how much money does he make, in a way they don't comment on the 5 series, or really any other BMW model." People look at an X6 and say how much money does he make. Really? Which people? How many people have you witnessed asking that question? Has anyone ever rolled down their window at a stop light and asked you how much money you make because you drive a BMW? Do you think this happens more often for an X6 than for a 750iL or an M5? Really? Maybe you get asked that question if you drive an X6 through the hood. If you really are a devoted BMW driver, then you know that driving a BMW is more about how you feel when you're behind the wheel than how you look. It's about looking forward to getting into the driver's seat and being part of a driving experience. So some people look forward to getting into a BMW that is roomy, quiet, comfortable, and has signature BMW handling. That's the X6.