You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Toyota Camry
2010 Toyota Camry

570 messages, Last post on Nov 22, 2009 at 9:52 PM
You are in the Toyota Camry Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Apr 06, 2009 12:25 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: wwest (Apr 05, 2009 7:48 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: 1lpn (Apr 06, 2009 12:06 pm) I have no complaints about the backlit trim - strange they are changing it. I may be buying a 2010 or 2011, so I'm curious. |
|
|
Replying to: acdii (Apr 06, 2009 12:38 pm) I hope I am not openning this thread for a flame war, I just wanted to pre-empt the Malibu/Taurus/Fusion fanboys boasting about mileage this and feature that when they never owned the thing. |
|
|
Replying to: acco20 (Apr 06, 2009 3:45 pm) I know I'd take understeer any day. Front wheels lose traction, the natural tendency is to immediately ease up on the gas. Result: car slows down, weight transfers to the front, and traction (and steering control) regained. With oversteer, you have to be very quick with the steering wheel to keep the rear end from coming around!
|
|
|
Replying to: acdii (Apr 06, 2009 8:29 am) There is a good, SOLID, foundation for dethrottling the engine of a FWD or F/awd the very instant wheelspin/slip due to too much engine torque for roadbed conditions is detected. Many of today's RWD and R/awd vehicles also have TC, Traction Control, but the design parameters often differ in that while the moderate braking of a spinning of slipping wheel will still be virtually INSTANTANEOUS, the engine dethrottling will often be delayed. The dethrottling delay will sometimes be for multiple seconds and in some cases only a few hundred milliseconds. Why...?? With loss of traction, wheelspin/slip due to too much engine torque for roadbed traction conditions on a RWD or R/awd the driver still has the ability to maintain directional control. Not so with FWD or F/awd, therefore the design engineers must do their utmost to prevent an extended period of loss of traction on one of these vehicles. So I stand by my statement, while FWD & F/awd vehicles are being made less unsafe via the specific TCS implementation they remain patently UNSAFE. ons. Most learned or experienced 4WD and 4X4 drivers are well aware that it is patently UNSAFE to drive, even on a low traction surface, above dead slow with the front drive engaged. Regretably there is no FWD or F/awd with automatic transaxle vehicle wherein the front drive can be disengaged, nor even QUICKLY disengaged(***) when conditions warrant. *** Of course you could, as the AAA recommends, quickly shift the transaxle into neutral to alleviate the potential from loss of control due to engine compression braking.
|
|
|
Replying to: 210delray (Apr 06, 2009 5:48 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: wwest (Apr 06, 2009 6:10 pm) I disagree with you though that today's FWD cars are inherently unsafe compared to their RWD peers. If this were even marginally true, where is the evidence -- wouldn't we have seen an increase in deaths/injuries on the roads over the past 30 years when FWD became far more popular among cars? But this really isn't the place to be discussing this...supposed to be talking about the 2010 Camry.
|
|
|
Replying to: 210delray (Apr 06, 2009 6:23 pm) No, developments and inventions like airbags, ABS, VSC, F/awd and now especially TCS have helped to keep all that in check.
|
|
|
Replying to: wwest (Apr 06, 2009 10:32 pm) Now that you've had your say on this subject in this forum like you have in every forum you participate in ... let it go. We've heard this same rant over and over and over and over and over and ..... in every FWD vehicle that comes along. We understand your pov. Not that many agree with it but we understand where you stand. Next subject. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Toyota Camry
2010 Toyota Camry
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Toyota Camry



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats