Sign In Join 

You are here: [F] Forums / Sedans / Toyota Camry / 2010 Toyota Camry



2010 Toyota Camry

533 messages,  Last post on Nov 09, 2009 at 9:51 AM

You are in the Toyota Camry Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Camry, Sedan


Messages Page 16 of 54
1
...
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
54
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#143 of 533
Re: What else changed? [thegraduate] by acdii
Apr 06, 2009 (9:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Apr 06, 2009 9:06 am)

OTOH, taking a sofa and putting it through a course can be a heck of a lot more exhilarating than a sports car. Coming from a background driving Crown Vics, the Camry is a fun car to put through its paces. You haven't had a heart pounding experience until you drift a Camry through a open road course. I did it last year up in WI just for fun, I also had the thrill of having the first Hybrid on that track.
#144 of 533
Re: What else changed? [acdii] by thegraduate
Apr 06, 2009 (9:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: acdii (Apr 06, 2009 9:24 am)

I can't imagine the non-defeatable VSC Toyota has would let you have much fun?
#145 of 533
Re: What else changed? [mcdawgg] by 1lpn
Apr 06, 2009 (12:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mcdawgg (Apr 06, 2009 8:26 am)

From what I am reading, the backlit trim around the stereo and hvac is gone, the stereo is updated (among other things, with matching optitron look), new window switches, and other unspecified trim changes.
 
I hoping that the unspecified changes include an honest center console, not the retarded tray that's there (which is really a step back from gen 5 - I own a 2002 V6 SE), and maybe do away from the cheapo plastic pocket on the back of the front seats, among other things.
 
Not much to ask, but you are right, people are biting on the tasty 2009 deals out there, so no reason for many to buy the 2010.
 
I, on the other hand, already plotting for deals that will enavitably come around for the 2010 models. I avoided the first 2 years on purpose after my sour experience with the 2002. Solid mechanically (120k on it now), but the hardware/brakes/sunroof problems sucked. Always have to give them 2-3 years to work out the issues, always.
 
When my wife was up for a car in 2007, I had no choice but to go for the last year of the previous gen Accord. Being the last year production, it has 20k miles on it and not a single issue. The deal was tasty and I punished Toyota for the experience on the 2002 Camry.
 
Before any of you Malibu\Taurus fanboys out there decide to gang-up and comment on what I said or toyota's "slipping quality": Put your money where your mouth is - go and buy yourself a Malibu/Taurus, and when you got 120k miles on it, come back and report, please.
#146 of 533
Re: What else changed? [1lpn] by thegraduate
Apr 06, 2009 (12:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 1lpn (Apr 06, 2009 12:06 pm)

Do many Chevy and Ford owners chime in often, here? It's a dedicated Toyota Camry forum. Just curious; I don't check in here too often (I own an Accord, but am not suffering from "Honda-Vision," as I like to check out what else is out there).
#147 of 533
Re: What else changed? [thegraduate] by acdii
Apr 06, 2009 (12:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Apr 06, 2009 12:25 pm)

I have a few Fords in my garage as well as the Camry. The Crown Vic/Grand Marquis cars are always tough dependable cars with good quality in them, they are just dated. With the exception of the 2007 Town Car, they are all over 120K miles on them and still going strong. The 1995 Grand marquis looks like hell since it has some weather damage to it, but on the coldest days, starts right up, only work put into it was new steering components, they took a beating on the crappy roads around here. My F30 is 10 years old, has 133K on it, no major repairs other than ball joints, and it is a 1 tom Behemoth that takes a beating. None of the Fords we have has had a trip back to the dealer for anything.
#148 of 533
Re: What else changed? [wwest] by acco20
Apr 06, 2009 (3:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wwest (Apr 05, 2009 7:48 pm)

wwest....I value almost all of your comments, usually backed up by your personal experience, but that statement about front wheel drive is below your usual expert response. Now don't go off quoting some silly results of testing using some dangerous moves performed on some test track by some people trying to prove the danger of front wheel drive. Those findings are about as acurate as the fact "even a blind squirrel will find a nut now and then", true,,,,but not real world. JMHO.
#149 of 533
Re: What else changed? [1lpn] by mcdawgg
Apr 06, 2009 (4:07 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 1lpn (Apr 06, 2009 12:06 pm)

Well, my 2007 I-4 manual has been perfect, except that I had the computer reprogrammed for the occassional hesitation on acceleration. It only took the dealer 25 minutes, and the car has been perfect ever since. Most of the mechanicals on this car are tried and true. The engine is the same as the 2002-2006, and the tranny (5 manual) is also the same. Many other major components are also the same. So I had no reason to fear a first year car, and I do not regret it. With the 2010, it is a new engine, but I still wouldn't have a problem buying one. I have had another first year total redesign Toyota from 2001, and had no problems except for a few rattles that were fixed. Honda, etc. is the same way.
 
I have no complaints about the backlit trim - strange they are changing it. I may be buying a 2010 or 2011, so I'm curious.
#150 of 533
Re: What else changed? [acdii] by 1lpn
Apr 06, 2009 (5:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: acdii (Apr 06, 2009 12:38 pm)

The Panther platform is one their better efforts, though, as you said, a bit dated.
 
I hope I am not openning this thread for a flame war, I just wanted to pre-empt the Malibu/Taurus/Fusion fanboys boasting about mileage this and feature that when they never owned the thing.
#151 of 533
Re: What else changed? [acco20] by 210delray
Apr 06, 2009 (5:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: acco20 (Apr 06, 2009 3:45 pm)

He's totally serious, believes FWD cars are inherently less safe than RWD cars because of a supposed tendency of the former to be more susceptible to understeer on pavement that's not dry. Silly me, I always thought oversteer was more dangerous for the average driver because it can cause a car to swap ends! The latter was one of Nader's chief criticisms of the original Corvair.
 
I know I'd take understeer any day. Front wheels lose traction, the natural tendency is to immediately ease up on the gas. Result: car slows down, weight transfers to the front, and traction (and steering control) regained. With oversteer, you have to be very quick with the steering wheel to keep the rear end from coming around!
#152 of 533
Re: What else changed? [acdii] by wwest
Apr 06, 2009 (6:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: acdii (Apr 06, 2009 8:29 am)

"..poor traction control that shut down the motor..."
 
There is a good, SOLID, foundation for dethrottling the engine of a FWD or F/awd the very instant wheelspin/slip due to too much engine torque for roadbed conditions is detected.
 
Many of today's RWD and R/awd vehicles also have TC, Traction Control, but the design parameters often differ in that while the moderate braking of a spinning of slipping wheel will still be virtually INSTANTANEOUS, the engine dethrottling will often be delayed. The dethrottling delay will sometimes be for multiple seconds and in some cases only a few hundred milliseconds.
 
Why...??
 
With loss of traction, wheelspin/slip due to too much engine torque for roadbed traction conditions on a RWD or R/awd the driver still has the ability to maintain directional control. Not so with FWD or F/awd, therefore the design engineers must do their utmost to prevent an extended period of loss of traction on one of these vehicles.
 
So I stand by my statement, while FWD & F/awd vehicles are being made less unsafe via the specific TCS implementation they remain patently UNSAFE. ons.
 
Most learned or experienced 4WD and 4X4 drivers are well aware that it is patently UNSAFE to drive, even on a low traction surface, above dead slow with the front drive engaged. Regretably there is no FWD or F/awd with automatic transaxle vehicle wherein the front drive can be disengaged, nor even QUICKLY disengaged(***) when conditions warrant.
 
*** Of course you could, as the AAA recommends, quickly shift the transaxle into neutral to alleviate the potential from loss of control due to engine compression braking.

Messages Page 16 of 54
1
...
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
54
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

You are here: [F] Forums / Sedans / Toyota Camry / 2010 Toyota Camry

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Learn More

2010 Toyota Camry

2010 Toyota Camry LE Sedan Shown

More Pictures

DoMore

Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement