Article Comments - 2009 Subaru Forester XT First Drive and Full Test

71 messages, Last post on Aug 26, 2009 at 11:14 AM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Wagon, SUV

First Drive: 2009 Subaru Forester XT - First Impressions: The style factor is up, but so is the practicality.(more)

Full Test: 2009 Subaru Forester 2.5XT Limited - Bottom Line: Bigger and better, the quirky little Forester has become a grown-up SUV. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 7 of 8: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; Prev; Next; Last

#58 of 71 Re: 2009 Forester Air Conditioner inadequacies [phdewi] by kurtamaxxxguy Jul 08, 2008 (3:47 pm)
Replying to: phdewi (Jul 08, 2008 3:31 pm) If you have a moon roof, the interior cover will get hot in sunlight (the moon roof is not well tinted) and put more load on the A/C. You could either have the moon roof glass tinted, or (assuming you do not open the roof very often) put a windshield reflector in the space between the glass and the interior sliding cover. Otherwise, my XT's A/C seems to do fine with our heat waves up here in Portland, OR. Then again, my XT's white (chosen to minimize summer heating).
#59 of 71 Re: 2009 Forester Air Conditioner inadequacies [phdewi] by buckhuntr Jul 16, 2008 (6:47 pm)
Replying to: phdewi (Jul 08, 2008 3:31 pm) My Forester's ac seems to handle the heat ok here in Tulsa. The onboard thermometer read 100F at 5:00 today, and the air cooled it down as fast as most any other car ac I've had.
#60 of 71 Re: 2009 Forester Air Conditioner inadequacies [phdewi] by red927 Jul 18, 2008 (7:57 am)
Replying to: phdewi (Jul 08, 2008 3:31 pm) It's been quite warm in NJ the past few days, but I have had no problem with the A/C. I leave it parked all day at the train station. The only thing I do is put a sunshade in the front windshield. If your car does not have the privacy glass, that also may cause the A/C to work harder.
#61 of 71 Moon roof tinting by kurtamaxxxguy Sep 03, 2008 (6:44 am)
Wrt the AC loads, I did get my moon roof tinted with 25% light reduction film. Made a big difference in summer heat load (sun roof interior cover doesn't get as hot) and did not obscure visibility out the moon roof all that much.). Cost was around $30. Replies to this message: ateixeira (Sep 03, 2008 8:11 am)
#62 of 71 Re: Moon roof tinting [kurtamaxxxguy] by ateixeira Sep 03, 2008 (8:11 am)
Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (Sep 03, 2008 6:44 am) Sounds cool. We just close the shade. I know we lose the roof itself, but it's not often that it gets that warm that we feel the need to do that. Plus, that's usually only when it's parked in the sun for a while. Our car port provides shade.
#63 of 71 2009 Forester A/C by rich505 Sep 03, 2008 (10:20 am)
I took delivery of a 2009 Forester 2.5X, Automatic, last week. I thought the outlet air with the A/C on was varying by the feel. Today I measured the temperature using a digital thermometer with a thermocouple. The outlet temperature does vary. If you sit at idle with the Recirculate Off the air temp can go up to 55-58 deg or more. As soon as you start up it drops down to 40 or so. If you go into Neutral at idle the air is about 50 deg. In Recirculate On mode I saw that the temperature will sometimes rise up to 45-48 and then drop back down again. The outlet temp goes as low as 36 deg in recirculate mode. I suspect the the compressor is cycling on and off and is giving temperature swings. Also the cooling system doesn't put out as much cooling at idle as with some RPMs on the engine. The manual does state that they do shut off the compressor under hard acceleration as when climbing a hill, a number of vehicles do this. The manual states that the Auto Climate Control can maintain an inside temperature of only 65 to 85 deg. That was one of the reasons I didn't want it. I had the sun roof glass tinted today with 35% visible light transmission film. I think that there is less heat coming throught the roof panel now. The manufacturers display in the shop said that all the films block greater than 95% of the heat and UV rays and allow varying amounts of visible light through depending on the darkness of the tint. Replies to this message: ateixeira (Sep 03, 2008 10:24 am)
#64 of 71 Re: 2009 Forester A/C [rich505] by ateixeira Sep 03, 2008 (10:24 am)
Replying to: rich505 (Sep 03, 2008 10:20 am) Coincidentally Kurt just had 20% film installed also. Let us know how you like it.
#65 of 71 Torque Split on AWD statement is wrong by henrylw Nov 18, 2008 (6:44 am)
"...the torque split for the AWD system constantly varies according to acceleration, deceleration and wheel slip, and as much as 100 percent of power can be directed to the wheels with the most grip." This is not correct. I sent an email to Subaru asking the questions about the torque split, and got reply from them as below: ------------------------------------------------ Thank you for contacting Subaru Canada, Inc. The Forester does not have a Variable Torque Distribution (VTD) centre differential. For the 2009 model year, the Forester 2.5XT includes a Multi-plate Transfer (MPT) System that adjusts torque from 60/40 (F/R) to 50/50 (or anywhere in-between) depending on throttle input, road conditions and input from the Vehicle Dynamics Control (VDC) System. VDC operates like most electronic stability control (ESC) systems in that it can adjust engine output, adjust individual brake pressure and even front rear torque distribution to retain/regain vehicle stability. It is not possible for the system defeat the role of the centre differential and thus torque output will always be split between the front and rear differential. Meaning, the system cannot direct 100% of power to a single wheel - whether it be with VTD or MPT. We trust this information is helpful. Sincerely, Rosanne Kernerman Bilingual Consumer Support Representative After Sales 1-800-894-4212 www.subaru.ca Replies to this message: kurtamaxxxguy (Feb 06, 2009 12:00 pm) ateixeira (Feb 09, 2009 11:16 am) 204meca (Aug 25, 2009 9:26 pm) ateixeira (Aug 26, 2009 11:14 am)
#66 of 71 Re: Torque Split on AWD statement is wrong [henrylw] by kurtamaxxxguy Feb 06, 2009 (12:00 pm)
Replying to: henrylw (Nov 18, 2008 6:44 am) That's a surprising narrow range of transfer ability. However, you can also install a fuse to defeat the AWD (for cases w/ emergency spare or other). At that point, Forester reverts to a FWD car, and I assume all the engine power is available for the FWD. Replies to this message: ateixeira (Feb 09, 2009 11:16 am) 204meca (Aug 25, 2009 9:26 pm) ateixeira (Aug 26, 2009 11:14 am)
#67 of 71 Re: Torque Split on AWD statement is wrong [kurtamaxxxguy] by ateixeira Feb 09, 2009 (11:16 am)
Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (Feb 06, 2009 12:00 pm) Yeah, I don't think that's correct. The FWD fuse disengages the rear axle completely, so 100/0 is possible. I think people mis-use the term 50/50. I think a lot of people mean the two axles are locked when they say that. Example with a viscous coupling: Let's say the front axle is on ice. At first the front wheels slip, but then the VC locks the two axles together, and the power is transmitted to the rear axle. If the two axles are truly locked together, the fact is the front axle is really getting no power at all, or perhaps only enough to overcome the inertia needed to spin the front tires at the same speed as the rears. So locked is not the same as 50/50. Locked means the power will go to whichever axle has grip. I think that's what they mean when they say "50/50".